1 University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
2 Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):220-231. doi: 10.1177/0022219419825855. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Despite concerted efforts to improve the reading skills of English language learners (ELLs), it remains unclear if the interventions they have been receiving produce any positive results. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine how effective reading interventions are in improving ELLs' reading skills and what factors may influence their effectiveness. Twenty-six studies with reported outcomes for pretest and posttest were selected, and four moderators (group size, intensity of intervention, students' risk status, and type of intervention) were coded. The results of random-effects analyses showed that the reading interventions had a large effect on ELLs' reading accuracy ( d = 1.221) and reading fluency ( d = 0.802) and a moderate effect on reading comprehension ( d = 0.499). In addition, for real-word reading accuracy, intervention groups composed of more than five students were less effective than groups composed of two to five students, and longer intervention sessions were less effective than shorter ones. Overall, our findings suggest that reading interventions have positive effects on ELLs' reading skills, and they should not be delayed until these students have reached a certain level of oral English proficiency.
尽管人们一直在努力提高英语学习者(ELLs)的阅读技能,但仍不清楚他们所接受的干预措施是否会产生任何积极的结果。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是检验阅读干预措施在提高 ELL 阅读技能方面的有效性,以及哪些因素可能影响其有效性。选择了 26 项具有前测和后测结果报告的研究,并对四个调节变量(小组规模、干预强度、学生风险状况和干预类型)进行了编码。随机效应分析的结果表明,阅读干预对 ELLs 的阅读准确性( d = 1.221)和阅读流畅性( d = 0.802)有很大的影响,对阅读理解( d = 0.499)有中等的影响。此外,对于真实单词阅读准确性,由五名以上学生组成的干预组不如由两到五名学生组成的干预组有效,而较长的干预时间不如较短的干预时间有效。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,阅读干预对 ELL 阅读技能有积极的影响,不应等到这些学生达到一定的英语口语水平后再进行干预。