• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对英语学习者的循证阅读干预措施:一项多层次荟萃分析。

Evidence-based reading interventions for English language learners: A multilevel meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cho Younghee, Kim Dongil, Jeong Sora

机构信息

Seoul National University, South Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Sep 13;7(9):e07985. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07985. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07985
PMID:34589624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8461348/
Abstract

The number of English Language Learners (ELLs) has been growing worldwide. ELLs are at risk for reading disabilities due to dual difficulties with linguistic and cultural factors. This raises the need for finding practical and efficient reading interventions for ELLs to improve their literacy development and English reading skills. The purpose of this study is to examine the evidence-based reading interventions for English Language Learners to identify the components that create the most effective and efficient interventions. This article reviewed literature published between January 2008 and March 2018 that examined the effectiveness of reading interventions for ELLs. We analyzed the effect sizes of reading intervention programs for ELLs and explored the variables that affect reading interventions using a multilevel meta-analysis. We examined moderator variables such as student-related variables (grades, exceptionality, SES), measurement-related variables (standardization, reliability), intervention-related variables (contents of interventions, intervention types), and implementation-related variables (instructor, group size). The results showed medium effect sizes for interventions targeting basic reading skills for ELLs. Medium-size group interventions and strategy-embedded interventions were more important for ELLs who were at risk for reading disabilities. These findings suggested that we should consider the reading problems of ELLs and apply the Tier 2 approach for ELLs with reading problems.

摘要

全球范围内,英语学习者(ELLs)的数量一直在增长。由于语言和文化因素带来的双重困难,英语学习者面临阅读障碍的风险。这就需要为英语学习者找到切实可行且高效的阅读干预措施,以促进他们的读写能力发展和英语阅读技能提升。本研究的目的是检验针对英语学习者的循证阅读干预措施,以确定构成最有效且高效干预措施的组成部分。本文回顾了2008年1月至2018年3月期间发表的有关研究英语学习者阅读干预措施有效性的文献。我们分析了针对英语学习者的阅读干预项目的效应量,并使用多层次荟萃分析探索了影响阅读干预的变量。我们考察了调节变量,如与学生相关的变量(年级、特殊情况、社会经济地位)、与测量相关的变量(标准化、信度)、与干预相关的变量(干预内容、干预类型)以及与实施相关的变量(教师、小组规模)。结果显示,针对英语学习者基础阅读技能的干预措施有中等效应量。中等规模的小组干预和嵌入策略的干预措施对有阅读障碍风险的英语学习者更为重要。这些研究结果表明,我们应该考虑英语学习者的阅读问题,并对有阅读问题的英语学习者采用二级干预方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ca/8461348/54c3c3da8f72/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ca/8461348/ea6eeddfb9b5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ca/8461348/54c3c3da8f72/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ca/8461348/ea6eeddfb9b5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ca/8461348/54c3c3da8f72/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-based reading interventions for English language learners: A multilevel meta-analysis.针对英语学习者的循证阅读干预措施:一项多层次荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 13;7(9):e07985. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07985. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Are Reading Interventions for English Language Learners Effective? A Meta-Analysis.英语学习者的阅读干预措施有效吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):220-231. doi: 10.1177/0022219419825855. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Literacy development of English language learners: the outcomes of an intervention programme in grade R.英语学习者的读写能力发展:R 年级一项干预计划的成果
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2010 Dec;57:58-65. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v57i1.50.
4
English language learners who struggle with reading: language acquisition or LD?在阅读方面存在困难的英语学习者:是语言习得问题还是学习障碍?
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;39(2):108-28. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390020101.
5
The cross-linguistic transfer of early literacy skills: the role of initial L1 and L2 skills and language of instruction.早期读写技能的跨语言迁移:第一语言和第二语言初始技能及教学语言的作用。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Jul;38(3):249-59. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/026).
6
A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers.比较语言技能:英语语言学习者和以英语为母语者在解码能力差、理解能力差和正常读者方面的差异。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;46(5):387-401. doi: 10.1177/0022219412466651. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
7
English Spelling Performance in Writing Samples Among Spanish-Speaking ELLs.西班牙语为母语的英语学习者写作样本中的英语拼写表现。
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Mar-Apr;55(2):114-122. doi: 10.1177/0022219420982995. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
8
Is Inquiry Science Instruction Effective for English Language Learners? A Meta-Analytic Review.探究式科学教学对英语学习者有效吗?一项元分析综述。
AERA Open. 2018 Apr-Jun;4(2). doi: 10.1177/2332858418767402. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Response to intervention and English-language learners: instructional and assessment considerations.对干预措施的反应与英语学习者:教学与评估考量
Semin Speech Lang. 2009 May;30(2):105-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215718. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
10
Examining the role of time and language type in reading development for English Language Learners.探究时间和语言类型在英语学习者阅读发展中的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2009 Jun;47(3):143-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Creative thinking in the teaching of Chinese language and literature in colleges from the perspective of educational psychology.从教育心理学视角看高校汉语言文学教学中的创造性思维
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:1018289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1018289. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Inquiry Science Instruction Effective for English Language Learners? A Meta-Analytic Review.探究式科学教学对英语学习者有效吗?一项元分析综述。
AERA Open. 2018 Apr-Jun;4(2). doi: 10.1177/2332858418767402. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Are Reading Interventions for English Language Learners Effective? A Meta-Analysis.英语学习者的阅读干预措施有效吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):220-231. doi: 10.1177/0022219419825855. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Equitable Access for Secondary English Learner Students: Course Taking as Evidence of EL Program Effectiveness.
为中学英语学习者提供公平机会:课程修习作为英语学习项目成效的证据。
Educ Adm Q. 2016 Aug;52(3):463-496. doi: 10.1177/0013161X16648190. Epub 2016 May 11.
4
Can Community and School-Based Supports Improve the Achievement of First-Generation Immigrant Children Attending High-Poverty Schools?社区和学校为基础的支持能否提高贫困学校第一代移民儿童的成绩?
Child Dev. 2016 May;87(3):883-97. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12507. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Effects of a phonological awareness program on English reading and spelling among Hong Kong Chinese ESL children.一项语音意识训练项目对香港华裔英语非母语儿童英语阅读和拼写的影响。
Read Writ. 2013 May;26(5):681-704. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9383-6.
6
Literacy development of English language learners: the outcomes of an intervention programme in grade R.英语学习者的读写能力发展:R 年级一项干预计划的成果
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2010 Dec;57:58-65. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v57i1.50.
7
Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: a synthesis of 20 years of research.小学高年级阅读困难学生的阅读干预措施:20年研究综述
Read Writ. 2010;23(8):889-912. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5.
8
Supporting early oral language skills for English language learners in inner city preschool provision.支持城市内学前教育中英语学习者的早期口语技能。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Dec;80(Pt 4):497-515. doi: 10.1348/000709910X493080. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
9
Interventions for reading difficulties: a comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers.针对阅读困难的干预措施:英语语言学习者(ELL)和英语作为外语(EFL)的阅读困难学生对干预反应的比较。
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Jul-Aug;41(4):333-52. doi: 10.1177/0022219408317859.
10
Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties.针对有阅读困难风险的一年级英语学习者的西班牙语干预措施的有效性。
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):56-73. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390010601.