• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“太可怕了。我没有设定限制”:减少赌场破产风险的近端和远端预防策略。

"It was terrible. I didn't set a limit": Proximal and Distal Prevention Strategies for Reducing the Risk of a Bust in Gambling Venues.

机构信息

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

Turning Point, Eastern Health, 110 Church Street, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec;35(4):1407-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09829-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-019-09829-0
PMID:30694401
Abstract

Although most gamblers set limits on their gambling and stick to them most of the time, there are times when limits are breached (a 'bust'). Little is known about the prevalence, reasons for and strategies to address busts despite associated harms with a single bust. This mixed methods study used an online survey with a sample of electronic gaming machine gamblers. A total of 104 gamblers were recruited from 11 Australian gambling venues and almost half (45%) reported a bust in the past 12 months. The amount of money spent on the bust ranged from $20 to $1500 AUD (M = $446, SD = $402). The presence of a bust was positively associated with the amount of money spent in the past 30 days, and self-reported greater gambling related harms and greater gambling severity. Reasons for busts included both distal (pre-venue) factors (i.e., negative affect, lapse in intentions to set a limit, needing to win money) and proximal (inside venue) factors (i.e., chasing losses, wins or spins, social facilitation and losing money too quickly). Bust-prevention strategies identified by participants were both distal (e.g., avoid gambling altogether, leave cards or cash at home, set a time or money limit) and proximal (e.g., walk away when losing and change the manner of gambling). As busts are relative to a priori limits, gamblers at any level of gambling severity can experience a bust. Repeated busts may be an indicator of loss of control and a progression towards problem gambling. Interventions need to focus on factors that mitigate the risk of a bust (e.g., pre-commitment) and that assist gamblers to stick to their limits all of the time.

摘要

虽然大多数赌徒都会设定赌博的限制,并在大多数时间内遵守这些限制,但有时也会突破这些限制(即“爆仓”)。尽管单次爆仓会带来相关危害,但人们对爆仓的普遍程度、原因以及应对策略知之甚少。本混合方法研究使用了一项在线调查,样本为电子赌博机赌徒。总共从澳大利亚的 11 个赌博场所以及网上招募了 104 名赌徒,其中近一半(45%)的人在过去 12 个月内报告了爆仓。爆仓所花费的金额从 20 澳元到 1500 澳元不等(M = 446,SD = 402)。爆仓的存在与过去 30 天内的花费金额呈正相关,并且与自我报告的更大的赌博相关危害和更严重的赌博程度呈正相关。爆仓的原因包括远端(即赌场外)因素(例如,负面情绪、意图突破限制的念头减弱、需要赢钱)和近端(即赌场内)因素(例如,追损失、赢钱或旋转、社交促进和输钱过快)。参与者提出的爆仓预防策略包括远端(例如,完全避免赌博、将卡片或现金留在家中、设定时间或金钱限制)和近端(例如,输钱时就离开、改变赌博方式)策略。由于爆仓与事先设定的限制有关,因此任何程度的赌徒都可能经历爆仓。多次爆仓可能是失去控制的指标,也是赌瘾问题发展的迹象。干预措施需要侧重于降低爆仓风险的因素(例如,预先承诺),并帮助赌徒始终遵守自己的限制。

相似文献

1
"It was terrible. I didn't set a limit": Proximal and Distal Prevention Strategies for Reducing the Risk of a Bust in Gambling Venues.“太可怕了。我没有设定限制”:减少赌场破产风险的近端和远端预防策略。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec;35(4):1407-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09829-0.
2
Use of Self-control Strategies for Managing Gambling Habits Leads to Less Harm in Regular Gamblers.使用自我控制策略来管理赌博习惯可减少常客的伤害。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):685-698. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09918-0.
3
An Exploratory RCT to Support Gamblers' Intentions to Stick to Monetary Limits: A Brief Intervention Using Action and Coping Planning.一项支持赌徒遵守货币限制意愿的探索性 RCT:使用行动和应对计划的简短干预。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):387-404. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09873-w.
4
Gambling Responsibly: Who Does It and To What End?负责任地赌博:谁在这样做以及目的何在?
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Mar;33(1):149-165. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9615-9.
5
Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers.问题赌徒与非问题赌徒的赌博动机、资金限制策略和预先承诺偏好。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Sep;26(3):361-72. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9170-8.
6
Self-reported Deposits Versus Actual Deposits in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study.在线赌博中的自我报告存款与实际存款:一项实证研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):619-637. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10230-1. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
Proximal and Distal Risk Factors for Gambling Problems Specifically Associated with Electronic Gaming Machines.与电子游戏机相关的赌博问题的近端和远端风险因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):277-295. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09867-8.
8
Setting Win Limits: An Alternative Approach to "Responsible Gambling"?设定赢钱限制:“负责任赌博”的另一种方式?
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):965-86. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9453-6.
9
Understanding the business versus care paradox in gambling venues: a qualitative study of the perspectives from gamblers, venue staff and counsellors.理解赌博场所的商业与关怀悖论:对赌客、场地工作人员和顾问观点的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2018 Sep 24;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0256-4.
10
Problem gamblers are hyposensitive to wins: an analysis of skin conductance responses during actual gambling on electronic gaming machines.问题赌徒对赢钱反应迟钝:对在电子游戏机上实际赌博期间皮肤电导率反应的分析。
Psychophysiology. 2014 Jun;51(6):556-64. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12198. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of the content and functionality of a just-in-time adaptive intervention for gambling problems: a mixed-methods evaluation of gambling habit hacker.即时自适应赌博问题干预措施的内容和功能可接受性:对赌博习惯黑客的混合方法评估
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 5;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00573-y.
2
Applying the Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention Framework to the Development of Gambling Interventions.将及时自适应干预框架应用于赌博干预措施的开发。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):717-747. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10250-x. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
3
Smartphone App Delivery of a Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention for Adult Gamblers (Gambling Habit Hacker): Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Locating gambling problems across a continuum of severity: Rasch analysis of the Quinte Longitudinal Study (QLS).定位严重程度连续体中的赌博问题:魁北克纵向研究(QLS)的 Rasch 分析。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
2
Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis.限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:一项因素分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;32(6):679-688. doi: 10.1037/adb0000393.
3
Screening for problem gambling within mental health services: a comparison of the classification accuracy of brief instruments.
针对成年赌徒的即时自适应干预措施(赌博习惯破解器)的智能手机应用程序交付:一项微随机试验的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 26;11(7):e38919. doi: 10.2196/38919.
4
A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling.对限制赌博金钱和现金的硬系统和工具的范围综述。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 17;10(3):587-600. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00065.
5
The Evolution of Gambling-Related Harm Measurement: Lessons from the Last Decade.赌博相关危害测量的演变:过去十年的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094395.
6
Opportunity Costs or Not? Validating the Short Gambling Harm Screen against a Set of "Unimpeachable" Negative Impacts.是机会成本还是并非如此?对照一系列“无可置疑”的负面影响来验证简短赌博危害筛查工具
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):549. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030549.
7
Gambling Self-Control Strategies: A Qualitative Analysis.赌博自控策略:定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020586.
8
Avoiding gambling harm: An evidence-based set of safe gambling practices for consumers.避免赌博危害:一套基于证据的消费者安全赌博实践。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0224083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224083. eCollection 2019.
精神卫生服务中的问题赌博筛查:简短工具分类准确性的比较。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113(6):1088-1104. doi: 10.1111/add.14150. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): A Tool for Assessment of Harms from Gambling.短赌博危害筛查表(SGHS)的验证:一种用于评估赌博危害的工具。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9698-y.
5
Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms.理解与赌博相关的危害:危害的拟议定义、概念框架及分类法。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 27;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0.
6
Predictors of relapse in problem gambling: a prospective cohort study.问题赌博复发的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar;31(1):299-313. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9408-3.
7
A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 2: factors that 'pull' the gambler away from relapse.电子游戏赌博问题复发预测因素的焦点小组研究,第 2 部分:使赌徒远离复发的“诱因”。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Sep;28(3):465-79. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9267-8.
8
A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 1: factors that 'push' towards relapse.电子游戏赌博问题复发的预测因素的焦点小组研究,第 1 部分:“推动”复发的因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Sep;28(3):451-64. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9264-y.
9
Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers.问题赌徒与非问题赌徒的赌博动机、资金限制策略和预先承诺偏好。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Sep;26(3):361-72. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9170-8.
10
Electronic gaming machine gambling: measuring motivation.电子游戏机赌博:测量动机。
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Sep;25(3):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9133-0. Epub 2009 Jul 7.