Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Heart Rhythm Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;57(3):353-359. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00512-3. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
The right ventricular (RV) septal unipolar voltage (UV) for predicting left ventricular (LV) septal scar wall thickness (WT) remains to be elucidated.
From 2013 to 2015, data obtained from RV and LV electroanatomic maps of 28 patients (mean age, 53 ± 16 years; 19 men [67.9%]) with/without identified LV septal scars were reviewed. Patients with an RV septal scar were excluded (n = 90). Direct measurement of septal WT was conducted (mean distance, 10.4 ± 3.3 mm). Patients in group 1 had a normal LV substrate, while those in group 2 had an LV septal scar. Fisher's linear discriminant formula was used to determine the dynamic UV criteria.
A total of 552 points were collected: 323 in 12 patients from group 1 and 229 in 16 patients from group 2. The UV of the RV septum is capable of identifying the opposite LV endocardial bipolar scar and is proportional to the WT of the interventricular septum. In the absence of an RV endocardial scar, the formula of "RV septal cut-off value = 0.736 × WT - 0.117 mV" has better sensitivity and specificity for predicting the LV septal scar (0.96 vs. 0.68 and 0.91 vs. 0.80, respectively) than the predefined fixed criteria of 8.3 mV with a net reclassification improvement of 25.7% (P < 0.001).
The combined measurement of UV and WT is more sensitive than the predefined fixed UV criteria for defining deep scars.
右心室(RV)间隔单极电压(UV)预测左心室(LV)间隔瘢痕壁厚度(WT)的作用仍需阐明。
2013 年至 2015 年,回顾了 28 例(平均年龄 53±16 岁;19 名男性[67.9%])患者的 RV 和 LV 电解剖图谱数据,这些患者中有/无明确的 LV 间隔瘢痕。排除 RV 间隔瘢痕患者(n=90)。直接测量间隔 WT(平均距离,10.4±3.3mm)。患者 1 组 LV 基质正常,患者 2 组 LV 间隔有瘢痕。Fisher 线性判别公式用于确定动态 UV 标准。
共采集 552 个点:12 例患者 1 组 323 个,16 例患者 2 组 229 个。RV 间隔的 UV 能够识别相反的 LV 心内膜双极瘢痕,与室间隔 WT 成正比。在没有 RV 心内膜瘢痕的情况下,“RV 间隔截止值=0.736×WT-0.117mV”公式预测 LV 间隔瘢痕的敏感性和特异性优于 8.3mV 的预设固定标准(分别为 0.96 与 0.68 和 0.91 与 0.80),净重新分类改善率为 25.7%(P<0.001)。
与预设的固定 UV 标准相比,UV 和 WT 的联合测量对定义深部瘢痕更敏感。