Agrawal Akanksha, Lu Marvin, Kanjanahattakij Napatt, Jeon Hee Do, Romero-Corral Abel, Figueredo Vincent, Pressman Gregg
Departments of Internal Medicine.
Cardiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Sep;30(6):406-412. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000716.
Rapid diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for appropriate management. Catheterization for a false STEMI activation has risks including exposure to contrast agent and radiation, increased healthcare costs and delay in treatment of the primary medical condition.
This was a single center retrospective study including all 'cath alerts' between January 2012 and December 2015. 'Cath alert' is a term used to activate the interventional cardiology team when STEMI is suspected by the emergency department physicians based on review of the initial ECG. We reviewed all STEMI alerts to understand ECG differences between true and false STEMI.
Our study population (N = 361) included 221 (61%) men and 140 (39%) women, with average age 60 ± 4.2 years. Among the 361 STEMI alerts, 82 (22.7%) did not have acute coronary syndrome. Common ECG causes of misdiagnosis included left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, found in 40/82, 49%), early repolarization changes (20/82, 24%), right bundle branch block (RBBB) (13/82, 16%), and Brugada pattern (3/82, 4%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that LVH and RBBB were independent predictors of nonacute coronary syndrome false STEMI (odds ratio: 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.93; P = 0.03 for LVH, and odds ratio: 0.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.62, P = 0.004 for RBBB).
The incidence of false STEMI alerts was almost 23% at our center. This number might be reduced with additional training of emergency department physicians in ECG interpretation, and recognition of common causes of misdiagnosis such as LVH, early repolarization changes, RBBB, and Brugada pattern.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的快速诊断对于恰当治疗至关重要。因误诊为STEMI而进行导管插入术存在风险,包括接触造影剂和辐射、增加医疗成本以及延误原发性疾病的治疗。
这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了2012年1月至2015年12月期间所有的“导管警报”。“导管警报”是急诊科医生在复查初始心电图怀疑为STEMI时用于启动介入心脏病学团队的术语。我们回顾了所有STEMI警报,以了解真、假STEMI之间的心电图差异。
我们的研究人群(N = 361)包括221名(61%)男性和140名(39%)女性,平均年龄60±4.2岁。在361例STEMI警报中,82例(22.7%)没有急性冠状动脉综合征。误诊的常见心电图原因包括左心室肥厚(LVH,40/82例,49%)、早期复极改变(20/82例,24%)、右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)(13/82例,16%)和Brugada波型(3/82例,4%)。多因素回归分析显示,LVH和RBBB是非急性冠状动脉综合征假STEMI的独立预测因素(比值比:0.54;95%置信区间:0.32 - 0.93;LVH的P = 0.03,比值比:0.26,95%置信区间:[0.1 - 0.62],RBBB的P = 0.004)。
在我们中心,假STEMI警报的发生率约为23%。通过对急诊科医生进行额外的心电图解读培训以及识别LVH、早期复极改变、RBBB和Brugada波型等误诊的常见原因,这一数字可能会降低。