• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施创伤质量改进计划通信包可缩短面部创伤手术的等待时间。

Implementation of a Trauma Quality Improvement Program Communications Package Decreases Time-to-Operation for Facial Trauma.

作者信息

Keller Patrick R, Schneeberger Steven, Drolet Brian C, Al Kassis Salam, Bennett Pearce F, Perdikis Galen

机构信息

Departments of Plastic Surgery, and.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;82(6S Suppl 5):S380-S385. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001818.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001818
PMID:30694849
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Facial trauma is common and carries significant morbidity and cost. Suboptimal interdisciplinary communication is associated with negative health outcomes. This study evaluates the clinical impact of implementation of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) interdisciplinary communication guidelines between facial surgery and trauma teams.

METHODS

Patients with facial trauma presenting to our level 1 trauma center between May and December 2017 were included (N = 812) and split into 3 groups, each anonymously representing a service that treats facial trauma. Services 1 and 2 were controls, and service 3 adopted TQIP communication guidelines. Mean and slope of time-to-operation (TTO) and mean length of stay were assessed 106 days before (n = 95) and 107 days after (n = 77) implementation.

RESULTS

For service 3, mean TTO decreased significantly from 6.2 to 2.9 days (P = 0.005) after implementation of the communication intervention. There was no significant difference in mean TTO preimplementation versus postimplementation in either control cohort, including service 1 (4.6 vs 4.9 days; P = 0.59) and service 2 (4.2 vs 4.5 days; P = 0.62). Average length of stay did not differ significantly between the preintervention versus postintervention in any service (service 1: 9.0 vs 8.3 days, P = 0.43; service 2: 4.6 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.85; service 3: 6.7 vs 6.4 days, P = 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that cost-free TQIP-guided improvement in interdisciplinary communication between the trauma service and a consulting surgical specialist decreases TTO for patients with operative facial trauma. Health care providers should develop strong well-defined communication channels between collaborating teams involved in patient care to optimize patient clinical outcomes.

摘要

引言

面部创伤很常见,会带来严重的发病率和成本。跨学科沟通欠佳与不良健康结果相关。本研究评估了美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)跨学科沟通指南在面部外科和创伤团队之间实施的临床影响。

方法

纳入2017年5月至12月在我们的一级创伤中心就诊的面部创伤患者(N = 812),并分为3组,每组匿名代表一个治疗面部创伤的科室。科室1和科室2为对照组,科室3采用TQIP沟通指南。在实施前106天(n = 95)和实施后107天(n = 77)评估手术时间(TTO)的均值和斜率以及平均住院时间。

结果

对于科室3,实施沟通干预后,平均TTO从6.2天显著降至2.9天(P = 0.005)。在任何一个对照组中,实施前与实施后的平均TTO均无显著差异,包括科室1(4.6天对4.9天;P = 0.59)和科室2(4.2天对4.5天;P = 0.62)。在任何科室中,干预前与干预后的平均住院时间均无显著差异(科室1:9.0天对8.3天,P = 0.43;科室2:4.6天对6.6天,P = 0.85;科室3:6.7天对6.4天,P = 0.45)。

结论

我们的研究表明,免费的TQIP指导下创伤科室与咨询外科专科医生之间跨学科沟通的改善可降低面部创伤手术患者的TTO。医疗保健提供者应在参与患者护理的协作团队之间建立强大且明确的沟通渠道,以优化患者的临床结局。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a Trauma Quality Improvement Program Communications Package Decreases Time-to-Operation for Facial Trauma.实施创伤质量改进计划通信包可缩短面部创伤手术的等待时间。
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;82(6S Suppl 5):S380-S385. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001818.
2
Maintaining patient throughput on an evolving trauma/emergency surgery service.在不断发展的创伤/急诊外科服务中维持患者周转量。
J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):481-6; discussion 486-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205861.29400.d9.
3
Simulation-based multidisciplinary team training decreases time to critical operations for trauma patients.基于模拟的多学科团队培训可缩短创伤患者进行关键手术的时间。
Injury. 2018 May;49(5):953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Service in a Community Hospital: Impact on Hospital Efficiency and Patient Outcomes.社区医院实施急性护理手术服务:对医院效率和患者结局的影响。
Am Surg. 2016 Jan;82(1):79-84.
5
Determining the impact of culture on venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients: A Southwestern Surgical Congress Multicenter trial.确定文化对创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的影响:西南外科学会多中心试验。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1030-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Multidisciplinary team approach to traumatic spinal cord injuries: a single institution's quality improvement project.创伤性脊髓损伤的多学科团队治疗方法:一个单一机构的质量改进项目。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0776-8. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Implementation of an oral and maxillofacial surgery trauma team in a major trauma centre.在一家大型创伤中心实施口腔颌面外科创伤团队。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 May;55(4):396-399. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.12.016. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
8
Association of Hospital Participation in a Regional Trauma Quality Improvement Collaborative With Patient Outcomes.医院参与区域创伤质量改进协作与患者结局的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):747-756. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0985.
9
Early geriatric consultation increases adherence to TQIP Geriatric Trauma Management Guidelines.早期老年病会诊可提高对TQIP老年创伤管理指南的依从性。
J Surg Res. 2017 Aug;216:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Integrating Geriatric Consults into Routine Care of Older Trauma Patients: One-Year Experience of a Level I Trauma Center.将老年病会诊整合到老年创伤患者的常规护理中:一家一级创伤中心的一年经验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1029-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.058. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.
2
Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分能否作为手术时间、住院时间和头部损伤的预测指标?我们在一级创伤中心的经验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_306_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.