• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。

Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219
PMID:36806064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9944272/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally, disproportionately affecting low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Understanding the factors determining implementation success for in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Programs (TQIPs) is critical to reducing the global trauma burden. We synthesised topical literature to identify key facilitators and barriers to in-hospital TQIP implementation across country income levels.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus databases were searched from June 2009 to January 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Published literature involving any study design, written in English and evaluating any implemented in-hospital quality improvement programme in trauma populations worldwide. Literature that was non-English, unpublished and involved non-hospital TQIPs was excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers completed a three-stage screening process using Covidence, with any discrepancies resolved through a third reviewer. Content analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research identified facilitator and barrier themes for in-hospital TQIP implementation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria from 3923 studies identified. The most discussed in-hospital TQIPs in included literature were trauma registries. Facilitators and barriers were similar across all country income levels. The main facilitator themes identified were the prioritisation of staff education and training, strengthening stakeholder dialogue and providing standardised best-practice guidelines. The key barrier theme identified in LMICs was poor data quality, while high-income countries (HICs) had reduced communication across professional hierarchies.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholder prioritisation of in-hospital TQIPs, along with increased knowledge and consensus of trauma care best practices, are essential efforts to reduce the global trauma burden. The primary focus of future studies on in-hospital TQIPs in LMICs should target improving registry data quality, while interventions in HICs should target strengthening communication channels between healthcare professionals.

摘要

目的

创伤是全球导致死亡和发病的主要原因,对中低收入国家(LMICs)的影响尤为严重。了解决定院内创伤质量改进计划(TQIPs)实施成功的因素对于降低全球创伤负担至关重要。我们综合了专题文献,以确定不同国家收入水平下院内 TQIP 实施的关键促进因素和障碍。

设计

范围审查。

数据来源

从 2009 年 6 月到 2022 年 1 月,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和全球索引医学数据库中进行了搜索。

入选标准

发表的文献涉及任何研究设计,用英文书写,并评估全球创伤人群中实施的任何院内质量改进计划。非英文、未发表和涉及非医院 TQIP 的文献被排除在外。

数据提取和综合

两名审查员使用 Covidence 完成了一个三阶段的筛选过程,任何分歧都通过第三名审查员解决。使用实施研究综合框架进行的内容分析确定了院内 TQIP 实施的促进因素和障碍主题。

结果

从 3923 篇文章中确定了 28 篇符合入选标准的文章。文献中讨论最多的院内 TQIP 包括创伤登记处。促进因素和障碍在所有国家收入水平下都是相似的。确定的主要促进因素主题包括优先考虑员工教育和培训、加强利益相关者对话和提供标准化最佳实践指南。在 LMICs 中确定的关键障碍主题是数据质量差,而高收入国家(HICs)则减少了专业阶层之间的沟通。

结论

利益相关者对院内 TQIP 的优先排序,以及增加对创伤护理最佳实践的了解和共识,是降低全球创伤负担的必要努力。未来在 LMICs 中进行院内 TQIP 研究的主要重点应针对提高登记处数据质量,而在 HICs 中的干预措施应针对加强医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通渠道。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5553/9944272/852fb938dc3e/bmjopen-2022-068219f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5553/9944272/4802d35fe65a/bmjopen-2022-068219f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5553/9944272/852fb938dc3e/bmjopen-2022-068219f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5553/9944272/4802d35fe65a/bmjopen-2022-068219f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5553/9944272/852fb938dc3e/bmjopen-2022-068219f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Assessment of trauma quality improvement activities at public hospitals in Thailand.泰国公立医院创伤质量改进活动评估。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.068. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
8
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.医疗环境中临床医生接受和使用人工智能的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e092624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092624.
9
Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家对私营营利性医疗服务提供者的公共管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD009855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009855.pub2.
10
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS).卡帕拉创伤评分(KTS)对多发创伤患者结局的预测价值与预计损伤严重程度评分(eISS)的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 May 14;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00989-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Transmural Trauma Care Model can be implemented well but some barriers and facilitators should be considered during implementation: a mixed methods study.跨壁创伤护理模式可以很好地实施,但在实施过程中应考虑一些障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
J Physiother. 2021 Oct;67(4):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Management of severe trauma worldwide: implementation of trauma systems in emerging countries: China, Russia and South Africa.全球严重创伤管理:新兴国家创伤系统的实施:中国、俄罗斯和南非。
Crit Care. 2021 Aug 9;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03681-8.
3
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to trauma registry development in resource-constrained settings: A survey of trauma registry stewards and researchers.
了解资源有限环境下创伤登记处发展的障碍和促进因素:对创伤登记处负责人和研究人员的调查。
Injury. 2021 Aug;52(8):2215-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative experiences from Tanzania.低收入和中等收入国家实施创伤登记的障碍与促进因素:来自坦桑尼亚的定性经验
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 1):S23-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Injury Prevention Programs: A Qualitative Exploration and Model Development.伤害预防计划实施的障碍和促进因素:定性探索与模型构建。
J Trauma Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;27(6):335-345. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000540.
6
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
7
Implementation of the WHO Trauma Care Checklist: A qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to use.世界卫生组织创伤护理检查表的实施:对使用的促进因素和障碍的定性分析
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Implementation of a multi-center digital trauma registry: Experience in district and central hospitals in Malawi.多中心数字化创伤登记系统的实施:马拉维地区和中心医院的经验。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1157-1172. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3023. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
9
Maximizing the potential of trauma registries in low-income and middle-income countries.最大化低收入和中等收入国家创伤登记处的潜力。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 May 12;5(1):e000469. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000469. eCollection 2020.
10
Perceptions of health providers towards the use of standardised trauma form in managing trauma patients: a qualitative study from Tanzania.医疗服务提供者对使用标准化创伤表格管理创伤患者的看法:一项来自坦桑尼亚的定性研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 May 1;7(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00244-3.