Ravidà Andrea, Barootchi Shayan, Askar Houssam, Suárez-López Del Amo Fernando, Tavelli Lorenzo, Wang Hom-Lay
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):68-84. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6893.
This systematic review evaluated the mean survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of dental implants with ≤ 6 mm in length, across a time frame of 5 years. The overall prosthetic and biologic complications were evaluated, and their survival rates obtained. In addition, the complication rates of the splinted vs nonsplinted implants were assessed.
An electronic literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (OVID) and Cochrane were performed, in addition to a manual search through all periodontics and implantology-related journals, up to October 2017, to identify relevant articles.
Out of 515 potentially eligible articles, 19 investigations assessing a total of 910 extra-short (≤ 6 mm) implants were included and further evaluated. After 5 years of follow-up, a mean survival rate of 94.1% (90% in the maxilla and 96% in the mandible) and a maximum bone loss of 0.53 mm were demonstrated. Additionally, a statistically significant difference in terms of bone loss was observed between tissue-level (0.12 mm) and bone-level implants (0.36 mm) at 12 months (P < .01), but not between internal and external abutment connections (P = .17). The most commonly reported prosthetic complication was screw loosening. Finally, splinted implants showed less overall prosthetic complications (RR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), screw loosening (RR = 15.2; 95% CI: 5.92 to 39.31), and implant failure (RR = 1.96; 95% CI: 0.8 to 4.8) than nonsplinted implants.
Extra-short implants are a viable treatment alternative in ridges exhibiting atrophy, demonstrating a satisfactory survival rate, as well as a low rate of prosthetic and biologic complications across a 5-year follow-up. Additionally, splinting extra-short implants is associated with fewer prosthetic complications and lower implant failure rate compared with nonsplinted implants.
本系统评价评估了长度≤6mm的牙种植体在5年时间内的平均生存率和边缘骨丢失(MBL)情况。对总体修复和生物学并发症进行了评估,并得出其生存率。此外,还评估了联冠式种植体与非联冠式种植体的并发症发生率。
除了手动检索截至2017年10月的所有牙周病学和种植学相关期刊外,还在PubMed(MEDLINE)、EMBASE(OVID)和Cochrane进行了电子文献检索,以确定相关文章。
在515篇可能符合条件的文章中,纳入了19项研究,共评估了910颗超短(≤6mm)种植体,并进行了进一步评估。经过5年的随访,平均生存率为94.1%(上颌为90%,下颌为96%),最大骨丢失为0.53mm。此外,在12个月时,组织水平种植体(0.12mm)和骨水平种植体(0.36mm)之间在骨丢失方面存在统计学显著差异(P<.01),但内部和外部基台连接之间无差异(P = 0.17)。最常报告的修复并发症是螺钉松动。最后,与非联冠式种植体相比,联冠式种植体的总体修复并发症(RR = 3.32;95%CI:1.9至5.7)、螺钉松动(RR = 15.2;95%CI:5.92至39.31)和种植体失败(RR = 1.96;95%CI:0.8至4.8)较少。
超短种植体是萎缩牙槽嵴的一种可行治疗选择,在5年随访中显示出令人满意的生存率,以及较低的修复和生物学并发症发生率。此外,与非联冠式种植体相比,联冠式超短种植体的修复并发症更少,种植体失败率更低。