School of Geography, The University of Melbourne, Carlton 3053, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030359.
Many schools in low-income countries have inadequate access to water facilities, sanitation and hygiene promotion. A systematic review of literature was carried out that aimed to identify and analyse the impact of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions (WASH) in schools in low-income countries. Published peer reviewed literature was systematically screened during March to June 2018 using the databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. There were no publication date restrictions. Thirty-eight peer reviewed papers were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The papers were analysed in groups, based on four categories of reported outcomes: (i) reduction of diarrhoeal disease and other hygiene-related diseases in school students; (ii) improved WASH knowledge, attitudes and hygiene behaviours among students; (iii) reduced disease burden and improved hygiene behaviours in students' households and communities; (iv) improved student enrolment and attendance. The typically unmeasured and unreported 'output' and/or 'exposure' of program fidelity and adherence was also examined. Several studies provide evidence of positive disease-related outcomes among students, yet other assessments did not find statistically significant differences in health or indicated that outcomes are dependent on the nature and context of interventions. Thirteen studies provide evidence of changes in WASH knowledge, attitudes and behaviours, such as hand-washing with soap. Further research is required to understand whether and how school-based WASH interventions might improve hygiene habits and health among wider family and community members. Evidence of the impact of school-based WASH programs in reducing student absence from school was mixed. Ensuring access to safe and sufficient water and sanitation and hygiene promotion in schools has great potential to improve health and education and to contribute to inclusion and equity, yet delivering school-based WASH intervention does not guarantee good outcomes. While further rigorous research will be of value, political will and effective interventions with high program fidelity are also key.
许多低收入国家的学校缺乏获取水设施、卫生和促进健康的机会。进行了一项系统文献回顾,旨在确定和分析水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施(WASH)在低收入国家学校中的影响。使用 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、Science Direct 和 Google Scholar 数据库,于 2018 年 3 月至 6 月期间系统筛选已发表的同行评议文献,没有发布日期限制。确定了 38 篇符合纳入标准的同行评议论文。根据报告结果的四个类别,将论文进行分组分析:(i)减少在校学生腹泻病和其他与卫生相关的疾病;(ii)提高学生的 WASH 知识、态度和卫生行为;(iii)减少学生家庭和社区的疾病负担和改善卫生行为;(iv)提高学生的入学率和出勤率。通常未测量和未报告的方案一致性和依从性的“输出”和/或“暴露”也进行了检查。有几项研究提供了学生相关疾病结果呈积极趋势的证据,但其他评估并未发现健康方面存在统计学显著差异,或者表明结果取决于干预措施的性质和背景。13 项研究提供了 WASH 知识、态度和行为变化的证据,例如用肥皂洗手。需要进一步研究以了解基于学校的 WASH 干预措施是否以及如何可能改善更广泛家庭和社区成员的卫生习惯和健康。关于学校 WASH 项目对减少学生缺课的影响的证据参差不齐。确保学校获得安全和充足的水、卫生设施和促进个人卫生,具有改善健康和教育、促进包容和平等的巨大潜力,但提供基于学校的 WASH 干预并不保证取得良好成果。虽然进一步进行严格的研究将具有价值,但政治意愿和具有高度方案一致性的有效干预措施也是关键。