Erismann Séverine, Diagbouga Serge, Schindler Christian, Odermatt Peter, Knoblauch Astrid M, Gerold Jana, Leuenberger Andrea, Shrestha Akina, Tarnagda Grissoum, Utzinger Jürg, Cissé Guéladio
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;97(3):904-913. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0964. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
The potential health benefits of combined agricultural, nutrition, water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions are poorly understood. We aimed to determine whether complementary school garden, nutrition, and WASH interventions reduce intestinal parasites and improve school children's nutritional status in two regions of Burkina Faso. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Plateau Central and Center-Ouest regions of Burkina Faso. A total of 360 randomly selected children, aged 8-15 years, had complete baseline and end-line survey data. Mixed regression models were used to assess the impact of the interventions, controlling for baseline characteristics. The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections decreased both in intervention and control schools, but the decrease was significantly higher in the intervention schools related to the control schools (odds ratio [OR] of the intervention effect = 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.1-0.5). Indices of undernutrition did not decrease at end-line in intervention schools. Safe handwashing practices before eating and the use of latrines at schools were significantly higher in the intervention schools than in the control schools at end-line (OR = 6.9, 95% CI = 1.4-34.4, and OR = 14.9, 95% CI = 1.4-153.9, respectively). Parameters of water quality remained unchanged. A combination of agricultural, nutritional, and WASH-related interventions embedded in the social-ecological systems and delivered through the school platform improved several child health outcomes, including intestinal parasitic infections and some WASH-related behaviors. Sustained interventions with stronger household and community-based components are, however, needed to improve school children's health in the long-term.
农业、营养、水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)综合干预措施对健康的潜在益处尚未得到充分了解。我们旨在确定在布基纳法索的两个地区,互补性的学校花园、营养和WASH干预措施是否能减少肠道寄生虫并改善学童的营养状况。在布基纳法索的中部高原和中西部地区进行了一项整群随机对照试验。总共360名随机挑选的8至15岁儿童拥有完整的基线和终线调查数据。使用混合回归模型评估干预措施的影响,并对基线特征进行控制。干预学校和对照学校的肠道寄生虫感染患病率均有所下降,但干预学校的下降幅度与对照学校相比显著更高(干预效果的优势比[OR]=0.2,95%置信区间[CI]=0.1-0.5)。干预学校在终线时营养不良指标并未下降。在终线时,干预学校中饭前安全洗手的做法和学校使用厕所的比例显著高于对照学校(OR分别为6.9,95%CI=1.4-34.4和OR=14.9,95%CI=1.4-153.9)。水质参数保持不变。嵌入社会生态系统并通过学校平台实施的农业、营养和与WASH相关的综合干预措施改善了多项儿童健康指标,包括肠道寄生虫感染和一些与WASH相关的行为。然而,需要长期开展更有力的以家庭和社区为基础的持续干预措施,以改善学童的健康状况。