Bick Sarah, Davies Katherine, Mwenge Mwamba, MacLeod Clara, Braun Laura, Chipungu Jenala, Chidziwisano Kondwani, Dreibelbis Robert
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 6;10(5):e018059. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018059.
School-age children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) face health and educational challenges due to inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in schools (WinS). Evidence for the impact of WinS interventions is limited and inconsistent, and previous systematic reviews have faced challenges in synthesising data due to varied interventions, study designs and outcome measures, although most do not examine this variability in more detail. This scoping review identified 83 experimental studies from 33 LMICs measuring a primary or secondary health or educational outcome among pupils, published up to November 2023, using a systematic search of seven databases and searching of reference lists of previous systematic reviews and included articles. These included 65 studies (78%) not included in previous WinS reviews and encompassed 313 intervention effects across 14 outcome domains. Interventions comprised an array of WASH technologies and approaches, often combining infrastructure and behaviour change methods and frequently integrated with other school-based initiatives like deworming. 36 studies (43%) measured only behavioural or knowledge outcomes. Our comprehensive inventory of study outcomes identified 158 unique outcome measures, with 72% measured in exactly one study. Common outcomes included parasitic infections, anthropometric measures and school absence, but approaches to measurement varied widely even for similar outcomes. Only 7% of results were disaggregated by gender, limiting assessment of differential impacts. Our findings underscore the need for standardised outcome measures in WinS research incorporating a complete definition of the assessment and aggregation approach, greater attention to gender-specific impacts, and further exploration of modalities and functions of WinS interventions alongside novel meta-analysis methods to disentangle effects of diverse intervention components.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的学龄儿童由于学校的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)不足而面临健康和教育挑战。学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施影响的证据有限且不一致,并且由于干预措施、研究设计和结果测量的多样性,以往的系统评价在综合数据方面面临挑战,尽管大多数评价没有更详细地研究这种变异性。本范围综述通过对七个数据库进行系统检索,并检索以往系统评价的参考文献列表和纳入的文章,从33个低收入和中等收入国家中确定了83项实验研究,这些研究测量了截至2023年11月发表的学生的主要或次要健康或教育结果。其中包括65项(78%)未纳入以往学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生评价的研究,涵盖14个结果领域的313项干预效果。干预措施包括一系列水、环境卫生和个人卫生技术和方法,通常将基础设施和行为改变方法结合起来,并经常与其他基于学校的举措(如驱虫)相结合。36项研究(43%)仅测量行为或知识结果。我们对研究结果的全面梳理确定了158项独特的结果测量指标,其中72%仅在一项研究中进行了测量。常见的结果包括寄生虫感染、人体测量指标和缺课情况,但即使对于相似的结果,测量方法也有很大差异。只有7%的结果按性别进行了分类,限制了对差异影响的评估。我们的研究结果强调,在学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生研究中需要标准化的结果测量指标,包括评估和汇总方法的完整定义,更加关注性别特异性影响,并进一步探索学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施的方式和功能,同时采用新颖的荟萃分析方法来理清不同干预成分的效果。