Weimar Wendi, Sumner Andrea, Romer Braden, Fox John, Rehm Jared, Decoux Brandi, Patel Jay
School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jan 28;7(2):32. doi: 10.3390/sports7020032.
The aims of the present study were to examine the influences of different push-off techniques on kinetic and kinematic parameters both in and out of the water. The two techniques were: (1) a push off that was characterized by rapid extension of knees and hips towards the wall, prior to contact (i.e., no countermovement), and, (2) where the swimmer glides into the wall, letting the wall flex the knees in an approximate countermovement or eccentric phase. Twenty trained male and female freestyle swimmers (age 26.1 ± 9.9 years, height 1.61 ± 0.04 m, and weight 65.6 ± 19.3 kg) participated. Data were analyzed by employing two (i.e., land and water) 3 (variables of interest) x 2 (push-off type) repeated measures ANOVAs with the alpha level set a priori at 05. Results indicated that there were significant main effects for peak perpendicular force ( < 0.001), perpendicular impulse ( = 0.018), and velocity at 2.5 m ( = 0.005) on land. However, no significant effects were found between techniques in the water trials. As many of the participants were master swimmers, it is possible that they were unable to approach the wall in the water at the requisite speed to elicit a benefit from the countermovement.
本研究的目的是考察不同蹬壁技术对水上和水下动力学及运动学参数的影响。这两种技术分别是:(1)一种蹬壁方式的特点是在接触池壁之前(即无反向动作),膝盖和臀部快速向池壁伸展;(2)游泳者滑向池壁,让池壁在近似反向动作或离心阶段使膝盖弯曲。20名经过训练的男女自由泳运动员(年龄26.1±9.9岁,身高1.61±0.04米,体重65.6±19.3千克)参与了研究。采用双因素(即陆地和水上)三因素(感兴趣的变量)×二因素(蹬壁类型)重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析,预先设定的α水平为0.05。结果表明,在陆地上,垂直力峰值(<0.001)、垂直冲量(=0.018)和2.5米处的速度(=0.005)存在显著主效应。然而,在水上试验中,两种技术之间未发现显著影响。由于许多参与者是成年游泳运动员,有可能他们在水中无法以所需速度靠近池壁,从而无法从反向动作中获益。