Harry John R, Paquette Max R, Schilling Brian K, Barker Leland A, James C Roger, Dufek Janet S
1 Texas Tech University.
2 The University of Memphis.
J Appl Biomech. 2018 Aug 1;34(4):291-297. doi: 10.1123/jab.2017-0305. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
This study sought to identify kinetic and electromyographic subphase characteristics distinguishing good from poor jumpers during countermovement vertical jumps (CMVJs), as defined by the reactive strength index (RSI, CMVJ displacement divided by jump time; cutoff = 0.46 m·s). A total of 15 men (1.8 [0.6] m, 84.5 [8.5] kg, 24 [2] y) were stratified by RSI into good (n = 6; RSI = 0.57 [0.07] m·s) and poor (n = 9; RSI = 0.39 [0.06] m·s) performance groups. The following variables were compared between groups using independent t tests (α = .05) and Cohen's d effect sizes (d ≥ 0.8, large): jump height, propulsive impulse, eccentric rate of force development, and jump time, unloading, eccentric, and concentric subphase times, and average electromyographic amplitudes of 8 lower extremity muscles. Compared with the poor RSI group, the good RSI group exhibited a greater, though not statistically different CMVJ displacement (d = 1.07, P = .06). In addition, the good RSI group exhibited a significantly greater propulsive impulse (P = .04, d = 1.27) and a significantly more rapid unloading subphase (P = .04, d = 1.08). No other significant or noteworthy differences were detected. Enhanced RSI appears related to a quicker unloading phase, allowing a greater portion of the total jumping phase to be utilized generating positive net force. Poor jumpers should aim to use unloading strategies that emphasize quickness to enhance RSI during CMVJ.
本研究旨在确定在反向运动垂直纵跳(CMVJ)过程中,区分优秀和较差纵跳者的动力学和肌电图子阶段特征,优秀和较差是根据反应力量指数(RSI,CMVJ位移除以跳跃时间;临界值 = 0.46 m·s)来定义的。共有15名男性(身高1.8[0.6]m,体重84.5[8.5]kg,年龄24[2]岁)根据RSI分为优秀表现组(n = 6;RSI = 0.57[0.07]m·s)和较差表现组(n = 9;RSI = 0.39[0.06]m·s)。使用独立t检验(α = 0.05)和科恩d效应量(d≥0.8为大效应)对两组之间的以下变量进行比较:跳跃高度、推进冲量、离心力发展速率、跳跃时间、卸载、离心和向心子阶段时间,以及8块下肢肌肉的平均肌电图振幅。与较差RSI组相比,优秀RSI组的CMVJ位移更大,但无统计学差异(d = 1.07,P = 0.06)。此外,优秀RSI组表现出显著更大的推进冲量(P = 0.04,d = 1.27)和显著更快的卸载子阶段(P = 0.04,d = 1.08)。未检测到其他显著或值得注意的差异。增强的RSI似乎与更快的卸载阶段有关,使得在整个跳跃阶段中有更大比例可用于产生正向净力。较差的纵跳者应旨在采用强调速度的卸载策略,以在CMVJ期间提高RSI。