Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性随机研究的直接结果,该研究比较了使用和不使用三维系统的nMARQ导管和PVAC导管进行消融的情况(MAPER 3D研究)。

Direct results of a prospective randomized study comparing ablation with the nMARQ catheter and the PVAC catheter used with and without a 3D system (MAPER 3D Study).

作者信息

Koźluk Edward, Piątkowska Agnieszka, Rodkiewicz Dariusz, Peller Michał, Kochanowski Janusz, Opolski Grzegorz

机构信息

1 Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan;15(1):78-85. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.68054. Epub 2017 May 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to compare in a prospective randomized study the safety, direct results and periprocedural data of ablation using an nMARQ catheter, a PVAC catheter used with the EnSite system, or a PVAC catheter only under fluoroscopy control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred two patients (70 male, 57 ±11 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively randomized to: group 1 - ablation performed with an nMARQ catheter and the CARTO 3 system; group 2 - a PVAC catheter used with the EnSite system; group 3 - ablation with a PVAC catheter without a 3D system.

RESULTS

Complete isolation of 400/402 pulmonary veins (PV) (99.5%). Linear ablation was performed in 23 patients in group 1 (small distance between lines isolating PV), in 3 patients in group 2, in 1 patient in group 3. The superior vena cava was isolated in 1 patient, 9 patients, and 9 patients respectively. Duration of fluoroscopy and dose area product were significantly smaller in group 1 (6.5 ±2.9 min/808.8 ±393.9 cGy/cm vs. 13.6 ±5.6 min/1662.6 ±677.8 cGy/cm and 18.8 ±7.6 min/2327.9 ±975.5 cGy/cm; < 0.001). Procedure duration was shorter in group 1 (82.9 ±18.8 min vs. 101.2 ±19.6 min, < 0.001 and 99.8 ±20.8 min, NS). Contrast injection was necessary in 2 patients in group 1, in 8 patients in group 2 and in all patients in group 3. Because nMARQ is a thermocool catheter, the volume of fluid injection was significantly greater (2348.5 ±543.5 ml vs. 1077.9 ±280.5 ml and 1076.5 ±375.6 ml, < 0.001). There were no periprocedural deaths. We observed no cardiac tamponade, neurological complications and no atrioesophageal fistula during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest radiological exposure was observed during ablation performed with an nMARQ catheter. 3D systems reduced fluoroscopy duration and the necessity of contrast injection. The nMARQ catheter requires injection of a large volume of fluid.

摘要

引言

我们的目的是在一项前瞻性随机研究中比较使用nMARQ导管、与EnSite系统联用的PVAC导管或仅在透视控制下使用PVAC导管进行消融的安全性、直接结果和围手术期数据。

材料与方法

102例房颤(AF)患者(70例男性,年龄57±11岁)被前瞻性随机分为:第1组——使用nMARQ导管和CARTO 3系统进行消融;第2组——与EnSite系统联用的PVAC导管;第3组——不使用三维系统的PVAC导管进行消融。

结果

402条肺静脉(PV)中的400条实现完全隔离(99.5%)。第1组23例患者进行了线性消融(隔离PV的线之间距离小),第2组3例,第3组1例。上腔静脉隔离分别为1例、9例和9例。第1组的透视时间和剂量面积乘积显著更小(6.5±2.9分钟/808.8±393.9 cGy/cm,对比13.6±5.6分钟/1662.6±677.8 cGy/cm和18.8±7.6分钟/2327.9±975.5 cGy/cm;P<0.001)。第1组的手术时间更短(82.9±18.8分钟,对比101.2±19.6分钟,P<0.001和99.8±20.8分钟,无显著性差异)。第1组2例患者需要注射造影剂,第2组8例,第3组所有患者均需要。由于nMARQ是一种热冷却导管,液体注射量显著更大(2348.5±543.5毫升,对比1077.9±280.5毫升和1076.5±375.6毫升,P<0.001)。围手术期无死亡病例。随访期间未观察到心脏压塞、神经并发症和房室食管瘘。

结论

使用nMARQ导管进行消融时,放射暴露最低。三维系统减少了透视时间和造影剂注射的必要性。nMARQ导管需要注射大量液体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0f/6348353/2882a5057d32/AMS-15-30049-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验