• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the usefulness of extracorporeal liver support techniques in patients with severe liver dysfunction.对严重肝功能不全患者体外肝脏支持技术有效性的评估。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan;15(1):99-112. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.67998. Epub 2017 May 25.
2
An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Extracorporeal Liver Support Techniques in Patients Hospitalized in the ICU for Severe Liver Dysfunction Secondary to Alcoholic Liver Disease.对因酒精性肝病继发严重肝功能不全而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者使用体外肝脏支持技术的效用评估。
Hepat Mon. 2016 Jul 2;16(7):e34127. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.34127. eCollection 2016 Jul.
3
Predictive value of the APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA and GCS scoring systems in patients with severe purulent bacterial meningitis.APACHE II、SAPS II、SOFA和GCS评分系统在重症化脓性细菌性脑膜炎患者中的预测价值。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(3):175-9. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0030. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores.预测创伤性脑损伤患者的六个月死亡率:常见重症监护严重程度评分的效用
Crit Care. 2014 Apr 3;18(2):R60. doi: 10.1186/cc13814.
5
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Validation of APACHE II and SAPS II scales at the intensive care unit along with assessment of SOFA scale at the admission as an isolated risk of death predictor.在重症监护病房对急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)进行验证,并在入院时评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表作为独立的死亡风险预测指标。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(2):107-111. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.86275.
7
[Predictive values of different critical scoring systems for survival rate after discharge in critically ill patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation].[不同危急评分系统对体外膜肺氧合支持的危重症患者出院后生存率的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 May;30(5):456-460. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.05.012.
8
Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients With Acute Kidney İnjury Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的急性肾损伤患者连续肾脏替代治疗与间歇性血液透析的疗效比较
Cureus. 2022 Jan 29;14(1):e21707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21707. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Increased Survival for Patients With Cirrhosis and Organ Failure in Liver Intensive Care and Validation of the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System.肝衰竭患者的生存增加和肝重症监护中的器官衰竭和慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评分系统的验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;13(7):1353-1360.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
10
Scoring systems for 6-month mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients: a prospective analysis of chronic liver failure - sequential organ failure assessment score (CLIF-SOFA).用于危重症肝硬化患者 6 个月死亡率的评分系统:慢性肝脏衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评估评分(CLIF-SOFA)的前瞻性分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;40(9):1056-65. doi: 10.1111/apt.12953. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A new in-hospital mortality prediction nomogram for intensive care unit patients with acute pancreatitis.一种用于急性胰腺炎重症监护病房患者的新型院内死亡预测列线图。
Arch Med Sci. 2023 Aug 12;20(1):61-70. doi: 10.5114/aoms/170960. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of the mechanism of cordyceps polysaccharide action on rat acute liver failure.虫草多糖对大鼠急性肝衰竭作用机制的评估。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;16(5):1218-1225. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94236. eCollection 2020.
3
End-stage liver failure: filling the treatment gap at the intensive care unit.终末期肝衰竭:填补重症监护病房的治疗空白
J Artif Organs. 2020 Jun;23(2):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s10047-019-01133-3. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
4
Incidence of infectious complications is associated with a high mortality in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.在乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者中,感染并发症的发生率与高死亡率相关。
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Aug 26;7(16):2204-2216. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2204.

本文引用的文献

1
An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Extracorporeal Liver Support Techniques in Patients Hospitalized in the ICU for Severe Liver Dysfunction Secondary to Alcoholic Liver Disease.对因酒精性肝病继发严重肝功能不全而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者使用体外肝脏支持技术的效用评估。
Hepat Mon. 2016 Jul 2;16(7):e34127. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.34127. eCollection 2016 Jul.
2
An evaluation of the usefulness of single pass albumin dialysis: key role of dialysate flow rate.单程白蛋白透析的效用评估:透析液流速的关键作用。
Crit Care. 2016 May 26;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1287-4.
3
Meta-analysis of survival with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system for liver failure.分子吸附循环系统治疗肝衰竭生存情况的荟萃分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):17046-54. eCollection 2015.
4
Molecular adsorbent recirculating system and single-pass albumin dialysis in liver failure--a prospective, randomised crossover study.分子吸附循环系统和单次通过白蛋白透析治疗肝衰竭——一项前瞻性随机交叉研究。
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 4;20:2. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1159-3.
5
Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A new syndrome that will re-classify cirrhosis.急性慢性肝衰竭:一种将重新分类肝硬化的新综合征。
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(1 Suppl):S131-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.045.
6
Hepatic encephalopathy in the course of alcoholic liver disease--treatment options in the intensive care unit.酒精性肝病过程中的肝性脑病——重症监护病房的治疗选择
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Jan-Mar;46(1):34-6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0007.
7
Albumin dialysis with a noncell artificial liver support device in patients with acute liver failure: a randomized, controlled trial.白蛋白透析联合非细胞型人工肝支持系统治疗急性肝衰竭患者的随机对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 15;159(8):522-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00005.
8
Extracorporeal albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system in acute-on-chronic liver failure: the RELIEF trial.应用分子吸附再循环系统的体外白蛋白透析治疗慢加急性肝衰竭:RELIEF 试验。
Hepatology. 2013 Mar;57(3):1153-62. doi: 10.1002/hep.26185. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
Acute-on chronic liver failure.急性加重慢性肝衰竭。
J Hepatol. 2012 Dec;57(6):1336-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
EASL clinical practical guidelines: management of alcoholic liver disease.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:酒精性肝病的管理
J Hepatol. 2012 Aug;57(2):399-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 26.

对严重肝功能不全患者体外肝脏支持技术有效性的评估。

An evaluation of the usefulness of extracorporeal liver support techniques in patients with severe liver dysfunction.

作者信息

Piechota Mariusz, Piechota Anna, Misztal Małgorzata, Bernas Szymon, Pietraszek-Grzywaczewska Iwona

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy - Centre for Artificial Extracorporeal Kidney and Liver Support, Dr Wł. Biegański Regional Specialist Hospital, Lodz, Poland.

Department of Insurance, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan;15(1):99-112. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.67998. Epub 2017 May 25.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2017.67998
PMID:30697259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6348365/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The mortality rate in patients with severe liver dysfunction with no option of transplantation is unacceptably high. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of applying extracorporeal liver support (ECLS) techniques in this group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from hospital admissions of 101 patients with severe liver dysfunction who were admitted to the department of Anaesthesiology and intensive therapy between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. The study group was divided into two subgroups. Standard Medical therapy (SMT) was a subgroup of patients receiving standard Medical therapy, and SMT + ECLS was a subgroup containing patients receiving standard medical therapy complemented by at least one extracorporeal liver support procedure.

RESULTS

Significantly lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and 30-day mortality rates were found in the SMT + ECLS subgroup ( = 0.0138 and = 0.0238 respectively). No difference in 3-month mortality was identified between the two groups. In a multivariate model, independent risk factors for ICU mortality proved to be the SOFA score and prothrombin time. The highest discriminatory power for ICU mortality was demonstrated for the SOFA score, followed by APACHE II, SAPS II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores. For 30-day mortality, however, the best discriminatory power was shown for the SAPS II score, followed by SOFA, APACHE II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to assess the contribution of non-biological extracorporeal liver support procedures to a decrease in mortality rates in the population of patients with severe liver dysfunction.

摘要

引言

对于严重肝功能不全且无移植选择的患者,其死亡率高得令人难以接受。本研究的主要目的是评估在这组患者中应用体外肝脏支持(ECLS)技术的有效性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了2006年至2015年间麻醉与重症治疗科收治的101例严重肝功能不全患者的住院数据。研究组分为两个亚组。标准药物治疗(SMT)亚组为接受标准药物治疗的患者,SMT + ECLS亚组为接受标准药物治疗并辅以至少一种体外肝脏支持程序的患者。

结果

SMT + ECLS亚组的重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率和30天死亡率显著降低(分别为 = 0.0138和 = 0.0238)。两组之间未发现3个月死亡率有差异。在多变量模型中,ICU死亡率的独立危险因素被证明是序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和凝血酶原时间。SOFA评分对ICU死亡率的鉴别能力最强,其次是急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)、终末期肝病模型(MELD UNOS)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。然而,对于30天死亡率,SAPS II评分的鉴别能力最佳,其次是SOFA、APACHE II、MELD UNOS和GCS评分。

结论

需要进一步研究来评估非生物体外肝脏支持程序对降低严重肝功能不全患者死亡率的作用。