Devita Renan, Pinho Sérgio, Ustrell Josep-Maria, Pretti Henrique, França Esdras-de Campos, Silva Ertty, Brum Igor
Rua do Ouvidor 183, sala 307, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Residencial Jardins do Lago Quadra 09, Rua Bouganville casa 04, Bairro Jardim Botȃnico, Brasilia, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):e1177-e1183. doi: 10.4317/jced.55282. eCollection 2018 Dec.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted to gather information regarding the opinion of Brazilian specialists in both orthodontics and implantology on multidisciplinary oral rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with malocclusion.
A total of 305 specialists participated in a telephone survey and answered an ad hoc 10-item questionnaire, including the request of total skull cone-beam tomographies (CBCT) and the use of 3D digital planning software, the best moment of treatment to place dental implants, and the integration of orthodontics in implantology.
Most participants did not request CBCT (90.8%) or 3D digital planning software images (92.3%) to diagnose and plan multidisciplinary oral rehabilitation. By contrast, 91.1% of participants would use an already dental implant as anchorage for orthodontics, 73.8% had already used implants for this purpose, 47.9% selected 4 months as the waiting time between implant placement and its use as anchorage, and 58.4% had already placed dental implants having in mind using them as anchorage for orthodontics and anticipating the oral rehabilitation process. Moreover, 93.4% of participants stated to avoid applying orthodontic forces in implants with unfavourable prognosis. A total of 67.9% of participants got the degree of specialist in Orthodontics before that of specialist in Implantology. The main reason for obtaining the other specialty degree was to be able to thoroughly exercise the two specialties.
The use of technological advances, such as CBCT and 3D digital planning software was limited. Most dental specialists would wait the osseointegration recommended time before applying orthodontic forces and thus using them as anchorage for orthodontics. The majority of interviewed dentists sought the other specialty to acquire multidisciplinary knowledge. Cross-sectional study, orthodontics, implantology, partially edentulous, malocclusion, oral rehabilitation.
开展了一项横断面调查,以收集巴西正畸和种植领域专家对牙列缺损伴错牙合畸形患者多学科口腔修复的看法。
共有305名专家参与了电话调查,并回答了一份专门设计的包含10个条目的问卷,内容包括全头颅锥形束断层扫描(CBCT)的要求和3D数字规划软件的使用、植入牙种植体的最佳治疗时机以及正畸在种植学中的整合。
大多数参与者在诊断和规划多学科口腔修复时不要求使用CBCT(90.8%)或3D数字规划软件图像(92.3%)。相比之下,91.1%的参与者会使用已有的牙种植体作为正畸支抗,73.8%的参与者已经为此目的使用过种植体,47.9%的参与者选择种植体植入与用作支抗之间的等待时间为4个月,58.4%的参与者在植入牙种植体时就已考虑将其用作正畸支抗并预期口腔修复过程。此外,93.4%的参与者表示会避免对预后不良的种植体施加正畸力。共有67.9%的参与者在获得种植专科医生学位之前获得了正畸专科医生学位。获得另一个专科医生学位的主要原因是能够全面开展这两个专科的工作。
CBCT和3D数字规划软件等技术进步的应用有限。大多数牙科专家会等待骨结合推荐时间后再施加正畸力,从而将种植体用作正畸支抗。大多数接受采访的牙医寻求另一个专科以获取多学科知识。横断面研究、正畸学、种植学、牙列缺损、错牙合畸形、口腔修复