Suppr超能文献

脆弱老年人的药物适宜性:对适当的多药疗法保持健康怀疑态度。

Medication Appropriateness in Vulnerable Older Adults: Healthy Skepticism of Appropriate Polypharmacy.

机构信息

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center and Geriatrics & Extended Care, West Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1123-1127. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15798. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

Abstract

Older adults are prescribed a growing number of medications. Polypharmacy, commonly considered the receipt of five or more medications, is associated with a range of adverse outcomes. There is a debate about the reason(s) why. On one side is the assertion that older persons are being prescribed too many medications, with the number of medications increasing the risk of adverse events. On the other side is the observation that polypharmacy is associated both with overprescribing of inappropriate medications and underprescribing of appropriate medications. This leads to the concept of "inappropriate" vs "appropriate" polypharmacy, with the latter resulting from the prescription of many correct medications to persons with multiple chronic conditions. Few studies have examined the health outcomes associated with adding and/or removing medications to address this debate directly. The criteria used to identify underutilized medications are based on results of randomized controlled trials that may not be generalizable to older adults. Several randomized controlled trials and many more observational studies provide evidence that these criteria overestimate medication benefits and underestimate harms. In addition, evidence suggests that the marginal effects of medications added to an already complex regimen differ from their effects when considered individually. Although in selected circumstances adding medications results in benefit to patients, patients with multimorbidity and frailty/disability have susceptibilities that can decrease the likelihood of medication benefit and increase the likelihood of harms. The identification of appropriate polypharmacy requires more robust criteria to evaluate the net effects of complex medication regimens.

摘要

老年人开的药越来越多。通常认为,同时服用五种或以上药物的患者为多重用药者,其存在一系列不良预后。对于导致这一现象的原因,存在着争论。一方面,有人断言老年人开的药太多了,用药数量增加了不良事件的风险。另一方面,有人观察到,多重用药既与不适当药物的过度开具有关,也与适当药物的开具不足有关。由此产生了“不适当”与“适当”多重用药的概念,后者是指为患有多种慢性疾病的患者开具了许多正确的药物。很少有研究直接针对这一争论,考察与添加和/或去除药物相关的健康结果。用于确定未充分利用药物的标准基于随机对照试验的结果,这些结果可能不适用于老年人。几项随机对照试验和更多的观察性研究提供了证据,表明这些标准高估了药物的益处,低估了药物的危害。此外,有证据表明,已经复杂的治疗方案中添加药物的边际效应与单独考虑药物时的效应不同。虽然在某些情况下添加药物对患者有益,但患有多种合并症和虚弱/残疾的患者存在一些敏感性,这些敏感性降低了药物获益的可能性,增加了药物不良反应的可能性。要确定适当的多重用药,需要更有力的标准来评估复杂药物治疗方案的净效应。

相似文献

8
9

引用本文的文献

7
Sex-specific medication trajectories in older adults newly diagnosed with diabetes.新诊断糖尿病的老年人的性别特异性用药轨迹。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jun 15;11:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100294. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验