Suppr超能文献

大动脉炎治疗的最新进展

Recent advances in the management of Takayasu arteritis.

作者信息

Misra Durga Prasanna, Wakhlu Anupam, Agarwal Vikas, Danda Debashish

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India.

Department of Rheumatology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;22 Suppl 1:60-68. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13285.

Abstract

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a challenging large vessel vasculitis to treat. Distinguishing disease activity from vascular damage is difficult, often relying on clinician judgement aided by composite clinical disease activity indices with angiographic evidence of vessel wall thickening or vessel wall hypermetabolism demonstrable on positron emission tomography computerized tomography (PET CT). Glucocorticoids form the mainstay of remission induction. While other conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are commonly used, evidence supporting their usefulness is sparse and generally of low quality. The only two randomized controlled trials (RCT) of a DMARD in TA failed to show efficacy of abatacept in reducing relapses of TA, however, tocilizumab showed a trend towards reduction in time to relapses. Of the cDMARDs, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), leflunomide and cyclophosphamide have shown clinical efficacy in case series, with some evidence that methotrexate, azathioprine and MMF might retard angiographic progression. Among bDMARDs, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents and tocilizumab may be useful in patients refractory to cDMARDs with retardation of angiographic progression, based on evidence derived from mostly retrospective case series, whereas the role of rituximab and ustekinumab needs further elucidation. Revascularization, either surgical or endovascular, is the treatment of choice to relieve critical, symptomatic stenoses and are best undertaken during inactive disease. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with TA also have increased cardiovascular risk and this requires appropriate management. Large studies involving multiple centers are the need of the hour to appropriately evaluate utility of currently available immunosuppressive therapy in TA.

摘要

高安动脉炎(TA)是一种治疗颇具挑战性的大血管血管炎。区分疾病活动与血管损伤很困难,通常依靠临床医生的判断,并借助综合临床疾病活动指数,同时结合血管造影显示的血管壁增厚证据或正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描(PET CT)显示的血管壁代谢亢进。糖皮质激素是诱导缓解的主要药物。虽然其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物(cDMARDs)或生物性DMARDs(bDMARDs)也常用,但支持其有效性的证据稀少且质量普遍较低。TA中关于一种DMARD的仅有的两项随机对照试验(RCT)未能显示阿巴西普在减少TA复发方面的疗效,然而,托珠单抗显示出有减少复发时间的趋势。在cDMARDs中,甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤、霉酚酸酯(MMF)、来氟米特和环磷酰胺在病例系列研究中已显示出临床疗效,有一些证据表明甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤和MMF可能会延缓血管造影进展。在bDMARDs中,基于大多来自回顾性病例系列的证据,抗肿瘤坏死因子α制剂和托珠单抗可能对cDMARDs难治的患者有用,可延缓血管造影进展,而利妥昔单抗和乌司奴单抗的作用需要进一步阐明。血管重建术,无论是外科手术还是血管腔内治疗,都是缓解严重的、有症状的狭窄的首选治疗方法,最好在疾病不活动期进行。新出现的证据表明,TA患者的心血管风险也增加,这需要适当的管理。目前急需开展涉及多个中心的大型研究,以恰当评估现有免疫抑制疗法在TA中的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验