Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sports Biomech. 2021 Mar;20(2):238-246. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1554085. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
The increasing interest in the biomechanical analysis of the golf swing warrants establishing the minimum number of trials required to obtain reliable data. Several such methods have been suggested previously for other movement tasks, and it has been shown that the number of required trials depends on the method used and on the task examined. This study aimed to compare three methods of reliability: a sequential average, intraclass correlations, and a modified version of the standard error of measurement (SEM). Kinematic and kinetic data of 10 recreational golfers performing 15 shots with both a six-iron and a driver was collected using a ten-camera motion capture system and force platforms. Range-of-motion, velocity, joint moments, and ground reaction forces were extracted and analysed using the three methods. The sequential average method yielded the highest number of required trials (12), while the intraclass correlations and SEM both resulted in lower numbers of required trials (4). Considering the variability between participants and strengths and limitations of the various methods, we conclude that 8 trials is sufficient for biomechanical analyses of a golf swing and recommend the SEM method for determining how many swings should be collected.
对高尔夫挥杆的生物力学分析越来越感兴趣,这就需要确定获得可靠数据所需的最小试验次数。以前已经提出了几种用于其他运动任务的此类方法,并且已经表明所需的试验次数取决于所使用的方法和所检查的任务。本研究旨在比较三种可靠性方法:顺序平均值、组内相关系数和测量标准误差(SEM)的修正版本。使用十台摄像机运动捕捉系统和力台,收集了 10 名休闲高尔夫球手使用 6 号铁杆和 1 号木杆进行 15 次击球的运动学和动力学数据。使用三种方法提取和分析运动范围、速度、关节力矩和地面反作用力。顺序平均值方法需要的试验次数最多(12 次),而组内相关系数和 SEM 都需要较少的试验次数(4 次)。考虑到参与者之间的差异以及各种方法的优缺点,我们得出结论,8 次试验足以进行高尔夫挥杆的生物力学分析,并建议使用 SEM 方法来确定应该收集多少次挥杆。