Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210189. eCollection 2019.
The Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) program is an NIH-funded effort testing the impact of career development interventions (e.g. internships, workshops, classes) on biomedical trainees (graduate students and postdoctoral fellows). BEST Programs seek to increase trainees' knowledge, skills and confidence to explore and pursue expanded career options, as well as to increase training in new skills that enable multiple career pathways. Faculty mentors are vital to a trainee's professional development, but data about how faculty members of biomedical trainees view the value of, and the time spent on, career development are lacking. Seven BEST institutions investigated this issue by conducting faculty surveys during their BEST experiment. The survey intent was to understand faculty perceptions around professional and career development for their trainees. Two different, complementary surveys were employed, one designed by Michigan State University (MSU) and the other by Vanderbilt University. Faculty (592) across five institutions responded to the MSU survey; 225 faculty members from two institutions responded to the Vanderbilt University survey. Participating faculty were largely tenure track and male; approximately 1/3 had spent time in a professional position outside of academia. Respondents felt a sense of urgency in introducing broad career activities for trainees given a recognized shortage of tenure track positions. They reported believing career development needs are different between a graduate student and postdoctoral fellow, and they indicated that they actively mentor trainees in career development. However, faculty were uncertain as to whether they actually have the knowledge or training to do so effectively. Faculty perceived that trainees themselves lack a knowledge base of skills that are of interest to non-academic employers. Thus, there is a need for exposure and training in such skills. Faculty stated unequivocally that institutional support for career development is important and needed. BEST Programs were considered beneficial to trainees, but the awareness of local BEST Programs and the national BEST Consortium was low at the time surveys were employed at some institutions. It is our hope that the work presented here will increase the awareness of the BEST national effort and the need for further career development for biomedical trainees.
拓宽科研培训经历(BEST)计划是一项由美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究,旨在测试职业发展干预措施(如实习、研讨会、课程)对生物医学受训者(研究生和博士后研究员)的影响。BEST 计划旨在增加受训者探索和追求扩展职业选择的知识、技能和信心,以及增加新技能的培训,以实现多种职业途径。教师导师对受训者的专业发展至关重要,但缺乏关于生物医学受训者的教师对职业发展的价值和投入时间的看法的数据。七家 BEST 机构通过在 BEST 实验期间进行教师调查来研究这个问题。调查的目的是了解教师对他们受训者的专业和职业发展的看法。两所不同的互补性大学参与了调查,一所是密歇根州立大学(MSU),另一所是范德比尔特大学。来自五所机构的 592 名教师对 MSU 的调查做出了回应;来自两所机构的 225 名教师对范德比尔特大学的调查做出了回应。参与调查的教师大多是终身教职,男性;大约 1/3 的人在学术界之外有过专业职位的工作经历。鉴于终身教职职位短缺,受访者认为有必要为受训者引入广泛的职业活动,因此他们感到了紧迫感。他们报告说,他们认为研究生和博士后研究员的职业发展需求不同,并且他们表示积极指导受训者进行职业发展。然而,教师不确定他们是否真的有知识或培训来有效地做到这一点。教师认为,受训者本身缺乏对非学术雇主感兴趣的技能的基本知识。因此,需要进行这些技能的培训和接触。教师明确表示,机构对职业发展的支持很重要,也是必要的。BEST 计划被认为对受训者有益,但在某些机构进行调查时,一些机构对当地 BEST 计划和全国 BEST 联盟的认识很低。我们希望这里展示的工作将提高对 BEST 全国努力的认识,以及对生物医学受训者进一步职业发展的需求。