• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018-2019 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。

Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.

机构信息

University at Buffalo, The State University of New York School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.

MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7595. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7595.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe7595
PMID:32001891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6983900/
Abstract

The 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee (RGAC) was charged with critically evaluating the leadership development support necessary for pharmacy researchers, including postdoctoral trainees, to develop the skills needed to build and sustain successful research programs and analyzing how well those needs are being met by existing programs both within AACP and at other organizations. The RGAC identified a set of skills that could reasonably be expected to provide the necessary foundation to successfully lead a research team and mapped these skills to the six domains of graduate education in the pharmaceutical sciences established by the 2016-2017 RGAC (Table 1). In addition, the RGAC identified competency in team science and the bench-to-bedside-to-beyond translational spectrum as being critical elements of research leadership. The universality of these skills and their value prompted the RGAC to make two related recommendations to AACP: [Table: see text] : AACP should promote the development and use of strategies to ensure intentional and ongoing professional development, such as Individual Development Plans. : AACP should explore collaborative research leadership development opportunities between faculty at research-intensive institutions and faculty at non-research-intensive institutions. The RGAC also examined programs available at AACP and other national organizations that could help pharmacy faculty develop foundational skills for research leadership (Table 2). The RGAC administered two surveys, one to administrators responsible for research at colleges and schools of pharmacy and one to faculty members at pharmacy schools, to gather information about training needs, programming and support available for research leadership development. Administrators and faculty agreed that research is important for career advancement for faculty, and almost all administrators reported their schools provide funds, release time and mentoring for participation in research career development. However, a lack of faculty awareness regarding programs and available support may be a barrier to participation. The RGAC therefore makes two recommendations and one suggestion related to AACP programming: [Table: see text] : AACP should expand research leadership development opportunities building from existing programs such as ALFP and AACP Catalyst, with consideration placed on developing programs that promote collaborative research. : AACP should collaborate with other professional organizations to expand research leadership development opportunities across the academy. : Colleges and schools of pharmacy should take a proactive role in promoting and facilitating research leadership development for faculty. The RGAC separately examined the research leadership development needs of postdoctoral trainees, recognizing the distinct needs of trainees along the PhD or PhD/PharmD, PharmD/fellowship, and PharmD/residency paths. A review of organizational resources and opportunities for post-doctoral trainees available from national organizations, including AACP, was undertaken (Table 5). The RGAC sees an opportunity for AACP to foster research development of those trainees whose career track will likely be in clinical practice and makes one recommendation and one suggestion related to postdoctoral trainees: : AACP should support and/or develop programs and activities for pharmacy residents seeking to transition into faculty positions to acquire the skills necessary to develop and lead research programs. : Colleges and schools of pharmacy should include postdoctoral trainees with academic interests in research leadership development opportunities available to junior faculty. In addition, the RGAC proposed one policy statement that was adopted July 2019 by the AACP House of Delegates: : AACP recognizes the positive role that research leadership development can play in the success of early and mid-career faculty.

摘要

2018-2019 年研究与研究生事务委员会(RGAC)的任务是批判性地评估药学研究人员(包括博士后受训人员)发展建立和维持成功研究计划所需的领导力发展支持,并分析现有计划在满足这些需求方面的表现如何这些需求在 AACP 内部和其他组织中都得到了满足。RGAC 确定了一组技能,这些技能可以合理地为成功领导研究团队提供必要的基础,并将这些技能映射到 2016-2017 年 RGAC 确定的药学研究生教育的六个领域(表 1)。此外,RGAC 确定团队科学方面的能力和从 bench-to-bedside-to-beyond 的转化范围是研究领导力的关键要素。这些技能的普遍性及其价值促使 RGAC 向 AACP 提出了两项相关建议:[表:见正文]:AACP 应促进制定和使用策略,以确保进行有目的的和持续的专业发展,例如个人发展计划。:AACP 应探索在研究密集型机构和非研究密集型机构的教师之间开展合作研究领导力发展的机会。RGAC 还检查了 AACP 和其他国家组织提供的可能有助于药学教师为研究领导力发展奠定基础技能的方案(表 2)。RGAC 管理了两项调查,一项针对学院和药学院的研究负责人,另一项针对药学院的教师,以收集有关培训需求、方案和研究领导力发展可用支持的信息。管理员和教师一致认为研究对教师的职业发展很重要,几乎所有管理员都报告说,他们的学校为参与研究职业发展提供资金、休假时间和指导。然而,教师对方案和可用支持的认识不足可能是参与的一个障碍。因此,RGAC 提出了两项与 AACP 方案相关的建议和一项建议:[表:见正文]:AACP 应在现有方案(如 ALFP 和 AACP Catalyst)的基础上扩大研究领导力发展机会,并考虑制定促进合作研究的方案。:AACP 应与其他专业组织合作,在整个学术界扩大研究领导力发展机会。:药学院和大学应在促进和促进教师研究领导力发展方面发挥积极作用。RGAC 分别研究了博士后受训人员的研究领导力发展需求,认识到他们沿着博士或博士/药学博士、药学博士/奖学金和药学博士/居住路径的独特需求。对国家组织(包括 AACP)提供的博士后受训人员的研究领导发展资源和机会进行了审查(表 5)。RGAC 认为 AACP 有机会培养那些未来职业道路可能在临床实践中的受训人员的研究发展,并提出了一项与博士后受训人员相关的建议和一项建议::AACP 应为寻求过渡到教职以获得开发和领导研究计划所需技能的药学住院医师提供支持和/或制定方案和活动。:药学院和大学应将对研究领导发展有兴趣的博士后受训人员纳入初级教职人员的研究领导发展机会。此外,RGAC 提出了一项政策声明,该声明于 2019 年 7 月被 AACP 代表大会通过::AACP 认识到研究领导力发展可以在早期和中期职业教师的成功中发挥积极作用。

相似文献

1
Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.2018-2019 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7595. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7595.
2
Breaking Down Barriers to Pharmacy Graduate Education: The Report of the 2017-2018 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.打破药学研究生教育障碍:2017-2018 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Sep;82(7):7147. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7147.
3
Competency, Programming, and Emerging Innovation in Graduate Education within Schools of Pharmacy: The Report of the 2016-2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.药学研究生院的能力、规划和新兴创新:2016-2017 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):S11. doi: 10.5688/ajpeS11.
4
Report of the 2018-2019 Strategic Engagement Standing Committee.2018-2019 年度战略参与常务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7597. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7597.
5
Building Implementation Science Capacity in Academic Pharmacy: Report of the 2020-2021 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.构建学术药学中的实施科学能力:2020-2021 年 AACP 研究与研究生事务委员会的报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Nov;85(10):8718. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8718. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Implementation Science to Advance Practice and Curricular Transformation: Report of the 2019-2020 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.实施科学以推进实践和课程改革:2019-2020 年 AACP 研究和研究生事务委员会的报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Oct;84(10):ajpe848204. doi: 10.5688/ajpe848204.
7
The Report of the 2021-2022 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.2021-2022 年 AACP 研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jan;87(1):ajpe9454. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9454.
8
Report of the 2023-2024 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.2023-2024 年 AACP 研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):100745. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100745. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Report of the 2018-2019 Student Affairs Standing Committee.2018-2019 年度学生事务常务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7656. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7656.
10
The Report of the 2016-2017 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Formally Embracing and Engaging Preceptors in the Academy - The Time Has Come.2016-2017 年专业事务常务委员会报告:正式拥抱并参与导师在学院中的角色——时机已到。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Nov;81(9):S16. doi: 10.5688/ajpeS16.

引用本文的文献

1
Building Implementation Science Capacity in Academic Pharmacy: Report of the 2020-2021 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.构建学术药学中的实施科学能力:2020-2021 年 AACP 研究与研究生事务委员会的报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Nov;85(10):8718. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8718. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Trends in Research and Graduate Programs in Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy, Part 1: Programs.药学学校和学院的研究和研究生课程趋势,第 1 部分:课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7643. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7643.

本文引用的文献

1
Breaking Down Barriers to Pharmacy Graduate Education: The Report of the 2017-2018 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.打破药学研究生教育障碍:2017-2018 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Sep;82(7):7147. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7147.
2
Competency, Programming, and Emerging Innovation in Graduate Education within Schools of Pharmacy: The Report of the 2016-2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.药学研究生院的能力、规划和新兴创新:2016-2017 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):S11. doi: 10.5688/ajpeS11.
3
Educational Background and Academic Rank of Faculty Members within US Schools of Pharmacy.美国药学院教职员工的教育背景和学术职称。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):61. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80461.
4
Recommendations for the successful pursuit of scholarship by pharmacy practice faculty members.药学实践教员成功开展学术研究的建议。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Feb 17;79(1):04. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79104.
5
Engaging external senior faculty members as faculty mentors.聘请外部资深教员担任教员导师。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):101. doi: 10.5688/ajpe785101.
6
A checklist for the development of faculty mentorship programs.教师指导计划制定检查表。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):98. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78598.
7
Research skills training for the doctor of pharmacy in U.S. schools of pharmacy: a descriptive study.美国药学院校药学博士的研究技能培训:一项描述性研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2009 Apr;17(2):115-21.
8
Perceived barriers to scholarship and research among pharmacy practice faculty: survey report from the AACP Scholarship/Research Faculty Development Task Force.药学实践教师在学术研究方面面临的感知障碍:美国药学院协会奖学金/研究教师发展特别工作组的调查报告
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):17. doi: 10.5688/aj730117.
9
Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty.牙科、医学、护理和药学实践教员的学术障碍。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Oct 15;71(5):91. doi: 10.5688/aj710591.