University at Buffalo, The State University of New York School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.
MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7595. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7595.
The 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee (RGAC) was charged with critically evaluating the leadership development support necessary for pharmacy researchers, including postdoctoral trainees, to develop the skills needed to build and sustain successful research programs and analyzing how well those needs are being met by existing programs both within AACP and at other organizations. The RGAC identified a set of skills that could reasonably be expected to provide the necessary foundation to successfully lead a research team and mapped these skills to the six domains of graduate education in the pharmaceutical sciences established by the 2016-2017 RGAC (Table 1). In addition, the RGAC identified competency in team science and the bench-to-bedside-to-beyond translational spectrum as being critical elements of research leadership. The universality of these skills and their value prompted the RGAC to make two related recommendations to AACP: [Table: see text] : AACP should promote the development and use of strategies to ensure intentional and ongoing professional development, such as Individual Development Plans. : AACP should explore collaborative research leadership development opportunities between faculty at research-intensive institutions and faculty at non-research-intensive institutions. The RGAC also examined programs available at AACP and other national organizations that could help pharmacy faculty develop foundational skills for research leadership (Table 2). The RGAC administered two surveys, one to administrators responsible for research at colleges and schools of pharmacy and one to faculty members at pharmacy schools, to gather information about training needs, programming and support available for research leadership development. Administrators and faculty agreed that research is important for career advancement for faculty, and almost all administrators reported their schools provide funds, release time and mentoring for participation in research career development. However, a lack of faculty awareness regarding programs and available support may be a barrier to participation. The RGAC therefore makes two recommendations and one suggestion related to AACP programming: [Table: see text] : AACP should expand research leadership development opportunities building from existing programs such as ALFP and AACP Catalyst, with consideration placed on developing programs that promote collaborative research. : AACP should collaborate with other professional organizations to expand research leadership development opportunities across the academy. : Colleges and schools of pharmacy should take a proactive role in promoting and facilitating research leadership development for faculty. The RGAC separately examined the research leadership development needs of postdoctoral trainees, recognizing the distinct needs of trainees along the PhD or PhD/PharmD, PharmD/fellowship, and PharmD/residency paths. A review of organizational resources and opportunities for post-doctoral trainees available from national organizations, including AACP, was undertaken (Table 5). The RGAC sees an opportunity for AACP to foster research development of those trainees whose career track will likely be in clinical practice and makes one recommendation and one suggestion related to postdoctoral trainees: : AACP should support and/or develop programs and activities for pharmacy residents seeking to transition into faculty positions to acquire the skills necessary to develop and lead research programs. : Colleges and schools of pharmacy should include postdoctoral trainees with academic interests in research leadership development opportunities available to junior faculty. In addition, the RGAC proposed one policy statement that was adopted July 2019 by the AACP House of Delegates: : AACP recognizes the positive role that research leadership development can play in the success of early and mid-career faculty.
2018-2019 年研究与研究生事务委员会(RGAC)的任务是批判性地评估药学研究人员(包括博士后受训人员)发展建立和维持成功研究计划所需的领导力发展支持,并分析现有计划在满足这些需求方面的表现如何这些需求在 AACP 内部和其他组织中都得到了满足。RGAC 确定了一组技能,这些技能可以合理地为成功领导研究团队提供必要的基础,并将这些技能映射到 2016-2017 年 RGAC 确定的药学研究生教育的六个领域(表 1)。此外,RGAC 确定团队科学方面的能力和从 bench-to-bedside-to-beyond 的转化范围是研究领导力的关键要素。这些技能的普遍性及其价值促使 RGAC 向 AACP 提出了两项相关建议:[表:见正文]:AACP 应促进制定和使用策略,以确保进行有目的的和持续的专业发展,例如个人发展计划。:AACP 应探索在研究密集型机构和非研究密集型机构的教师之间开展合作研究领导力发展的机会。RGAC 还检查了 AACP 和其他国家组织提供的可能有助于药学教师为研究领导力发展奠定基础技能的方案(表 2)。RGAC 管理了两项调查,一项针对学院和药学院的研究负责人,另一项针对药学院的教师,以收集有关培训需求、方案和研究领导力发展可用支持的信息。管理员和教师一致认为研究对教师的职业发展很重要,几乎所有管理员都报告说,他们的学校为参与研究职业发展提供资金、休假时间和指导。然而,教师对方案和可用支持的认识不足可能是参与的一个障碍。因此,RGAC 提出了两项与 AACP 方案相关的建议和一项建议:[表:见正文]:AACP 应在现有方案(如 ALFP 和 AACP Catalyst)的基础上扩大研究领导力发展机会,并考虑制定促进合作研究的方案。:AACP 应与其他专业组织合作,在整个学术界扩大研究领导力发展机会。:药学院和大学应在促进和促进教师研究领导力发展方面发挥积极作用。RGAC 分别研究了博士后受训人员的研究领导力发展需求,认识到他们沿着博士或博士/药学博士、药学博士/奖学金和药学博士/居住路径的独特需求。对国家组织(包括 AACP)提供的博士后受训人员的研究领导发展资源和机会进行了审查(表 5)。RGAC 认为 AACP 有机会培养那些未来职业道路可能在临床实践中的受训人员的研究发展,并提出了一项与博士后受训人员相关的建议和一项建议::AACP 应为寻求过渡到教职以获得开发和领导研究计划所需技能的药学住院医师提供支持和/或制定方案和活动。:药学院和大学应将对研究领导发展有兴趣的博士后受训人员纳入初级教职人员的研究领导发展机会。此外,RGAC 提出了一项政策声明,该声明于 2019 年 7 月被 AACP 代表大会通过::AACP 认识到研究领导力发展可以在早期和中期职业教师的成功中发挥积极作用。