Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):66-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677009. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
Clinicians using clinical decision support (CDS) to prescribe medications have an obligation to ensure that prescriptions are safe. One option is to verify the safety of prescriptions if there is uncertainty, for example, by using drug references. Supervisory control experiments in aviation and process control have associated errors, with reduced verification arising from overreliance on decision support. However, it is unknown whether this relationship extends to clinical decision-making. Therefore, we examine whether there is a relationship between verification behaviors and prescribing errors, with and without CDS medication alerts, and whether task complexity mediates this.
A total of 120 students in the final 2 years of a medical degree prescribed medicines for patient scenarios using a simulated electronic prescribing system. CDS (correct, incorrect, and no CDS) and task complexity (low and high) were varied. Outcomes were omission (missed prescribing errors) and commission errors (accepted false-positive alerts). Verification measures were access of drug references and view time percentage of task time.
Failure to access references for medicines with prescribing errors increased omission errors with no CDS (high-complexity: (1) = 12.716; < 0.001) and incorrect CDS (Fisher's exact; low-complexity: = 0.002; high-complexity: = 0.001). Failure to access references for false-positive alerts increased commission errors (low-complexity: (1) = 16.673, < 0.001; high-complexity: (1) = 18.690, < 0.001). Fewer participants accessed relevant references with incorrect CDS compared with no CDS (McNemar; low-complexity: < 0.001; high-complexity: < 0.001). Lower view time percentages increased omission ((3, 361.914) = 4.498; = 0.035) and commission errors ((1, 346.223) = 2.712; = 0.045). View time percentages were lower in CDS-assisted conditions compared with unassisted conditions ((2, 335.743) = 10.443; < 0.001).
The presence of CDS reduced verification of prescription safety. When CDS was incorrect, reduced verification was associated with increased prescribing errors.
CDS can be incorrect, and verification provides one mechanism to detect errors. System designers need to facilitate verification without increasing workload or eliminating the benefits of correct CDS.
使用临床决策支持(CDS)开处方的临床医生有责任确保处方安全。一种选择是在存在不确定性的情况下验证处方的安全性,例如通过使用药物参考资料。航空和过程控制中的监督控制实验存在错误,由于过度依赖决策支持,验证减少。然而,尚不清楚这种关系是否扩展到临床决策。因此,我们研究了在有无 CDS 药物警报的情况下,验证行为与处方错误之间是否存在关系,以及任务复杂性是否会对此产生影响。
共有 120 名医学专业最后两年的学生使用模拟电子处方系统为患者场景开处方。CDS(正确、错误和无 CDS)和任务复杂性(低和高)是变化的。结果是遗漏(错过的处方错误)和委托错误(接受假阳性警报)。验证措施是访问药物参考资料和查看任务时间百分比。
对于有处方错误的药物,未能访问参考资料会增加无 CDS 时的遗漏错误(高复杂性:(1)=12.716;<0.001)和错误 CDS(Fisher 确切检验;低复杂性:(1)=0.002;高复杂性:(1)=0.001)。未能访问假阳性警报的参考资料会增加委托错误(低复杂性:(1)=16.673,<0.001;高复杂性:(1)=18.690,<0.001)。与无 CDS 相比,有错误 CDS 的参与者访问相关参考资料的人数更少(McNemar;低复杂性:<0.001;高复杂性:<0.001)。较低的查看时间百分比会增加遗漏((3,361.914) = 4.498;=0.035)和委托错误((1,346.223) = 2.712;=0.045)。与无辅助条件相比,CDS 辅助条件下的查看时间百分比较低((2,335.743) = 10.443;<0.001)。
CDS 的存在减少了处方安全性的验证。当 CDS 不正确时,验证减少与处方错误增加有关。
CDS 可能不正确,验证提供了一种检测错误的机制。系统设计人员需要促进验证,而不会增加工作量或消除正确 CDS 的好处。