Mathew F M, Rashid K Y, Gulya T J, Markell S G
Department of Plant Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, Manitoba R6M 1Y5, Canada.
Plant Dis. 2015 Jan;99(1):160. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-14-0858-PDN.
During September 2012, Phomopsis stem canker was observed on sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) in a production field during seed filling with an average incidence of 15% in Morden, Manitoba (approximately 49°11'N and 98°09'W). The infected plants had elongated, brown-black lesions surrounding the leaf petiole, with numerous pycnidia, pith damage, and mid-stem lodging. Twenty sunflower plants were randomly sampled from the field. Isolations were made from the margins of the necrotic stems lesions by plating small pieces (5 mm) on potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 0.02% streptomycin sulfate. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 14 days under a 12-h photoperiod, and hyphal tips of white to grey colonies were transferred to PDA. Five isolates producing black pycnidia (occasionally with ostiolate beaks) and alpha conidia were tentatively identified as a Diaporthe sp. Alpha conidia were ellipsoidal, hyaline, and 6.5 to 8.5 × 2.5 to 3.5 μm. DNA was extracted from the mycelium of five isolates, and the ITS region was amplified and sequenced using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (4). BLASTn analysis of the 600-bp fragment (GenBank Accession Nos. KM391960 to KM391964) showed that the best match was Phomopsis sp. AJY-2011a strain T12505G (Diaporthe gulyae R.G. Shivas, S.M. Thompson & A.J. Young [3], Accession No. JF431299) from H. annuus with identities = 540/540 (100%) and gaps = 0/540 (0%). The five D. gulyae isolates were tested for pathogenicity on a sunflower confection inbred cv. HA 288 using the stem-wound method (2). Four-week-old sunflower plants (10 plants per isolate) were inoculated by wounding the stems on the second internode with a micropipette tip and placing a Diaporthe-infested mycelial plug on the wound. All plugs were attached to the wound with Parafilm. The pots were placed on the greenhouse benches at 25°C under a 16-h light/dark cycle. At 3 days after inoculation, dark brown lesions were observed on the stems extending upward from the inoculation site. Stem and leaves wilted, causing plant death 14 days after inoculation. Disease severity was calculated as a percentage of stem lesion (lesion length/stem length × 100%) at 14 days after inoculation. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in disease severity were observed among D. gulyae isolates, which ranged from 34.9 to 100.0% (n = 5). Ten control plants similarly treated with sterile PDA plugs did not display symptoms. To complete Koch's postulates, D. gulyae was re-isolated from the inoculated stems, and the pathogen's identity was confirmed via sequencing of the ITS regions using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (4). The pathogen was not isolated from the control plants. D. gulyae was first reported as a pathogen on H. annuus in Australia and United States in 2011 (1,3). The pathogen was determined to be as or more aggressive than the other causal agents of Phomopsis stem canker (2,3), and its identification in both countries was circumstantially associated with increased incidence and yield loss in commercial production fields (1,3). In Canada, Phomopsis stem canker has been observed in sunflower fields over the last 10 years at low incidences, especially in years with above-normal temperatures during the sunflower growing season; however, the causal agent was not confirmed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of D. gulyae causing Phomopsis stem canker on sunflowers in Canada. Since there is currently no known resistance to D. gulyae in sunflower, this newly discovered pathogen may become a threat to sunflower production in Canada. References: (1) F. Mathew et al. Phytopathology 101:S115, 2011. (2) F. Mathew et al. Phytopathology 103:S2.91, 2013. (3) S. M. Thompson et al. Persoonia 27:80, 2011. (4) T. J. White et al. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis et al., eds. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.
2012年9月,在马尼托巴省莫登市(约北纬49°11′,西经98°09′)的一个向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)种子灌浆期生产田块中,发现了向日葵拟茎点霉茎溃疡病,平均发病率为15%。受感染植株的叶柄周围有细长的棕黑色病斑,有大量分生孢子器、髓部损伤和茎中部倒伏。从田间随机抽取20株向日葵植株。从坏死茎部病斑边缘进行分离,将小块组织(5毫米)接种于添加0.02%硫酸链霉素的马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA)平板上。平板在25°C、12小时光周期下培养14天,将白色至灰色菌落的菌丝尖端转接至PDA平板。初步鉴定出5个产生黑色分生孢子器(偶尔有具孔口的喙)和α分生孢子的分离株为间座壳属(Diaporthe)的一个种sp.。α分生孢子椭圆形,透明,大小为6.5至8.5×2.5至3.5微米。从5个分离株的菌丝体中提取DNA,使用引物ITS5和ITS4对ITS区域进行扩增和测序(4)。对600碱基对片段(GenBank登录号KM391960至KM391964)进行BLASTn分析表明,最佳匹配为来自向日葵的向日葵拟茎点霉AJY - 2011a菌株T12505G(Diaporthe gulyae R.G. Shivas, S.M. Thompson & A.J. Young [3],登录号JF431299),一致性为540/540(100%),缺口为0/540(0%)。使用茎部创伤法(2)对5个D. gulyae分离株在向日葵食用型自交系cv. HA 288上进行致病性测试。用微量移液器尖端在四周龄向日葵植株(每个分离株10株)的第二茎节处创伤茎部,并在伤口处放置一块被间座壳属侵染的菌丝块。所有菌丝块均用Parafilm固定在伤口上。将花盆置于温室苗床上,温度为25°C,光照/黑暗周期为16小时。接种后3天,在茎部接种部位上方观察到深褐色病斑。茎和叶枯萎,接种后14天导致植株死亡。在接种后14天,以茎部病斑占比(病斑长度/茎长度×100%)计算病害严重程度。在D. gulyae分离株之间观察到病害严重程度存在显著差异(P≤0.05),范围为34.9%至100.0%(n = 5)。用无菌PDA菌丝块进行类似处理的10株对照植株未出现症状。为完成柯赫氏法则,从接种的茎部重新分离出D. gulyae,并使用引物ITS5和ITS4对ITS区域进行测序以确认病原菌的身份(4)。未从对照植株中分离到病原菌。D. gulyae于2011年首次在澳大利亚和美国被报道为向日葵上的病原菌(1,3)。该病原菌被确定与向日葵拟茎点霉茎溃疡病的其他致病因子一样具有侵染性或更强(2,3),并且在这两个国家其鉴定与商业生产田块中发病率增加和产量损失有间接关联(1,3)。在加拿大,过去10年在向日葵田块中曾观察到向日葵拟茎点霉茎溃疡病,但发病率较低,特别是在向日葵生长季节温度高于正常水平的年份;然而,致病因子未得到确认。据我们所知,这是加拿大首次报道D. gulyae引起向日葵拟茎点霉茎溃疡病。由于目前在向日葵中尚未发现对D. gulyae的抗性,这种新发现的病原菌可能对加拿大的向日葵生产构成威胁。参考文献:(1) F. Mathew等人,《植物病理学》101:S115,2011年。(2) F. Mathew等人,《植物病理学》103:S2.91,2013年。(3) S. M. Thompson等人,《真菌学报》27:80,2011年。(4) T. J. White等人,载于《PCR实验指南:方法与应用》第315页。M. A. Innis等人编著。学术出版社,圣地亚哥,1990年。