Han Ziduan, Walters Thomas W, Zasada Inga A
Washington State University NWREC, Mt. Vernon, 98273.
United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Plant Dis. 2014 Nov;98(11):1514-1520. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-13-1235-RE.
The plant-parasitic nematode Pratylenchus penetrans is a major constraint to the production of red raspberry. To determine whether several popular raspberry cultivars in Washington State differ in susceptibility to P. penetrans and whether post-plant nematicides treatments are warranted, five independent, multiyear trials were conducted. Trials in existing plantings of 'Cascade Bounty', 'Chemainus', 'Meeker' (two trials), and 'Saanich' raspberry were established in northwest Washington. Treated plots were protected from P. penetrans by applying nematicides over a 3-year period, while nontreated plots received no nematicides. P. penetrans population densities in soil and root samples were assessed spring and fall of each year. In addition, impact of P. penetrans on raspberry yield, fruit composition, cane production, and root biomass was measured several times in each cultivar during the 3-year study. P. penetrans root population densities in nematicide-treated plots were consistently lower than those in nontreated plots at all the samplings. There were few consistent treatment differences in fine root biomass, the preferred feeding sites for P. penetrans. However, a complete root system sampling of one of the cultivars did show greater fine root biomass in treated plants compared with nontreated plants. When differences were observed aboveground, treated plants yielded less than corresponding nontreated plants, indicating that the nematicides may have been phytotoxic to some of the cultivars. This study suggests that post-plant nematicide applications are of limited benefit because, at least during the 3-year time period of this study, there were few observable benefits of protecting these raspberry cultivars from P. penetrans.
植物寄生线虫穿刺短体线虫是红树莓生产的主要限制因素。为了确定华盛顿州几种常见的树莓品种对穿刺短体线虫的敏感性是否存在差异,以及种植后是否有必要进行杀线虫剂处理,开展了五项独立的多年试验。在华盛顿州西北部的“喀斯喀特 bounty”“彻梅纳斯”“米克”(两项试验)和“萨尼奇”树莓现有种植园中进行了试验。在三年时间里,对处理过的地块施用杀线虫剂以防止穿刺短体线虫侵害,而未处理的地块不施用杀线虫剂。每年春季和秋季评估土壤和根系样本中的穿刺短体线虫种群密度。此外,在为期三年的研究中,多次测量了穿刺短体线虫对每个品种树莓产量、果实成分、茎干产量和根系生物量的影响。在所有采样中,杀线虫剂处理地块的穿刺短体线虫根系种群密度始终低于未处理地块。在细根生物量(穿刺短体线虫的首选取食部位)方面,处理差异很少一致。然而,对其中一个品种进行的完整根系采样确实表明,与未处理的植株相比,处理过的植株细根生物量更大。当观察到地上部分存在差异时,处理过的植株产量低于相应的未处理植株,这表明杀线虫剂可能对某些品种具有植物毒性。这项研究表明,种植后施用杀线虫剂的益处有限,因为至少在本研究的三年时间内,保护这些树莓品种免受穿刺短体线虫侵害几乎没有明显益处。