Suppr超能文献

素食者、非素食素食者和杂食者对食用昆虫的态度。

Insect Consumption Attitudes among Vegans, Non-Vegan Vegetarians, and Omnivores.

机构信息

School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, University of Eastern Finland, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland.

Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Jan 29;11(2):292. doi: 10.3390/nu11020292.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consumption of foods of insect origin is encouraged, since insect consumption is seen as one of the responses to the environmental impact of meat production. This study examines the attitude (A), subjective norm (SN), perceived behavioral control (PC), and food neophobia (FN) toward the consumption of foods of insect origin, as well as the conditions for eating insect-based foods among vegans, vegetarians, and omnivores.

METHODS

The data was obtained by using an online survey and convenience sampling ( = 567, of whom omnivores represented 74%, vegans 5%, and non-vegan vegetarians 22%).

RESULTS

The three dietary groups exhibited significantly different intention (I) to eat foods of insect origin. Vegans held the most rigid negative attitude (A), and their subjective norm (SN) to eat insects was weaker compared to that of omnivores ( < 0.001) and non-vegan vegetarians ( < 0.001). Vegans' perceived behavioral control (PC) over their eating of insects was stronger compared to that of omnivores ( < 0.001) and non-vegan vegetarians < 0.001), and they were more neophobic than omnivores ( < 0.001) and non-vegan vegetarians ( < 0.001). Non-vegan vegetarians held the most positive attitude toward eating insects, and both non-vegan vegetarians and omnivores thought that insect consumption is wise and offers a solution to the world's nutrition problems. In contrast, vegans regarded insect consumption as immoral and irresponsible.

CONCLUSIONS

Vegans' weak intention, negative attitude, and low willingness to eat insects in the future exhibit their different dietarian identity compared to that of omnivores and non-vegan vegetarians.

摘要

背景

食用昆虫类食物受到鼓励,因为食用昆虫被视为应对肉类生产对环境影响的措施之一。本研究调查了消费者对食用昆虫类食物的态度(A)、主观规范(SN)、感知行为控制(PC)和食物恐惧(FN),以及纯素食者、素食者和杂食者食用昆虫类食物的条件。

方法

通过在线调查和便利抽样(=567 人,其中杂食者占 74%,纯素食者占 5%,非纯素食素食者占 22%)获得数据。

结果

三个饮食群体对食用昆虫类食物的意向(I)存在显著差异。纯素食者对食用昆虫类食物的态度最为僵化(A),与杂食者( < 0.001)和非纯素食素食者( < 0.001)相比,他们对食用昆虫类食物的主观规范(SN)较弱。纯素食者对食用昆虫类食物的感知行为控制(PC)强于杂食者( < 0.001)和非纯素食素食者( < 0.001),并且比杂食者( < 0.001)和非纯素食素食者( < 0.001)更恐惧食用昆虫类食物。非纯素食素食者对食用昆虫类食物的态度最为积极,而且非纯素食素食者和杂食者都认为食用昆虫类食物是明智的,是解决世界营养问题的一种方法。相比之下,纯素食者认为食用昆虫类食物不道德且不负责任。

结论

与杂食者和非纯素食素食者相比,纯素食者食用昆虫类食物的意向较弱、态度消极、未来食用意愿低,这体现了他们不同的饮食身份。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Alternative proteins; A path to sustainable diets and environment.替代蛋白:通往可持续饮食与环境的途径。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Oct 10;9:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100882. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

7
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns.合理规划肉食摄入。“4N”原则。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:114-28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验