Raine Gary, Khouja Claire, Khatwa Meena, Fulbright Helen, Sutcliffe Katy, Sowden Amanda J
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK.
EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 11;11(4):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10050.
Some individuals experience abnormally persistent and intense symptoms of grief that significantly interfere with daily functioning. This condition has been described using terms such as complicated or prolonged grief and prolonged grief disorder (PGD).
To identify the availability of evidence addressing a range of policy relevant issues related to grief, bereavement and PGD. In this paper we focus on the availability of evidence from systematic reviews.
We searched 12 databases and the websites of 18 grief- or bereavement-related organisations. Using key characteristics extracted from included reviews, we produced a high-level overview of the available evidence that enabled potential research gaps to be identified.
We identified 212 reviews - 103 focused on people's experiences of grief/bereavement including service use; 22 reported on PGD prevalence, 42 on PGD risk factors, 37 on factors that influence grief more broadly and 80 on the effectiveness of grief-related interventions. Fifty-five reviews focused on multiple issues of interest. Half of reviews focused on a specific cause/type of death ( = 108). Of these reviews, most focused on three main causes/types of death: a specific health condition or terminal illness ( = 36), perinatal loss ( = 34) and suicide ( = 20).
We identified a large number of reviews, but key evidence gaps exist, particularly in relation to intervention cost-effectiveness and social, organisational or structural-level interventions that are needed for addressing inequities and other modifiable factors that can impair grieving and potentially increase the risk of PGD.
一些人经历了异常持久且强烈的悲伤症状,这严重干扰了日常功能。这种情况已用诸如复杂性或延长性悲伤以及延长性悲伤障碍(PGD)等术语来描述。
确定关于悲伤、丧亲之痛和PGD等一系列与政策相关问题的证据的可得性。在本文中,我们聚焦于系统评价中的证据可得性。
我们检索了12个数据库以及18个与悲伤或丧亲之痛相关组织的网站。利用从纳入的评价中提取的关键特征,我们对现有证据进行了高层次概述,从而能够识别潜在的研究空白。
我们识别出212篇评价——103篇聚焦于人们的悲伤/丧亲之痛经历,包括服务使用情况;22篇报告了PGD的患病率,42篇报告了PGD的风险因素,37篇报告了更广泛影响悲伤的因素,80篇报告了与悲伤相关干预措施的有效性。55篇评价聚焦于多个感兴趣的问题。一半的评价聚焦于特定的死亡原因/类型(=108)。在这些评价中,大多数聚焦于三种主要的死亡原因/类型:特定的健康状况或晚期疾病(=36)、围产期损失(=34)和自杀(=20)。
我们识别出大量评价,但关键证据空白依然存在,尤其是在干预措施的成本效益以及解决不平等问题和其他可能损害悲伤并潜在增加PGD风险的可改变因素所需的社会、组织或结构层面干预措施方面。