• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轴向厚度及粘结剂类型差异对复合树脂CAD/CAM全冠抗折性的影响

Effect of Differences in Axial Thickness and Type of Cement on Fracture Resistance in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns.

作者信息

Masuda Tomotoshi, Nomoto Syuntaro, Sato Toru, Kanda Yuuhei, Sakai Takanori, Tsuyuki Yu

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College.

出版信息

Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2019 Feb 28;60(1):17-27. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

DOI:10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0022
PMID:30700646
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of differences in axial thickness and type of cement on fracture load in CAD/CAM crowns. Assuming the mandibular first premolar to be the abutment tooth, 4 types of crown with different axial thicknesses and radii of curvature were prepared. To unify external design, the morphology of the crown margins was set at 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, or 0.60 mm, thus maintaining uniform axial form of the crowns. The CAD/CAM crowns and abutment teeth were bonded using each of 2 types of resin cement or polycarboxylate cement. The fracture load value was measured using a universal testing machine and the destruction phase observed.No significant difference was observed with change in axial thickness. The fracture load values with each of the 2 types of resin cement used were significantly higher than that with polycarboxylate cement (p<0.01). These results suggest that the fracture load values of CAD/CAM crowns are not influenced by differences in the axial thickness of the crown, and that they are higher when bonding is achieved with resin rather than polycarboxylate cement.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查轴向厚度和粘结剂类型的差异对计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)全冠折裂载荷的影响。假设下颌第一前磨牙为基牙,制备了4种具有不同轴向厚度和曲率半径的全冠。为统一外部设计,将全冠边缘形态设置为0.15、0.30、0.45或0.60mm,从而保持全冠轴向形态的一致。使用2种树脂粘结剂或聚羧酸锌粘结剂分别粘结CAD/CAM全冠和基牙。使用万能试验机测量折裂载荷值并观察破坏阶段。未观察到轴向厚度变化有显著差异。使用的2种树脂粘结剂各自的折裂载荷值均显著高于聚羧酸锌粘结剂(p<0.01)。这些结果表明,CAD/CAM全冠的折裂载荷值不受全冠轴向厚度差异的影响,并且当使用树脂而非聚羧酸锌粘结剂进行粘结时,折裂载荷值更高。

相似文献

1
Effect of Differences in Axial Thickness and Type of Cement on Fracture Resistance in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns.轴向厚度及粘结剂类型差异对复合树脂CAD/CAM全冠抗折性的影响
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2019 Feb 28;60(1):17-27. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
Effects of Cuspal Inclination and Luting Agent on Fracture Load Values in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns.牙尖斜度和黏接剂对 CAD/CAM 复合树脂全冠牙体折裂负荷值的影响。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2022 Jun 15;63(2):55-66. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0017. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.复合树脂和长石质全瓷CAD/CAM冠的断裂载荷。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.014.
4
Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses.不同粘结剂厚度制备的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造整体冠的抗折性评估。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;21(4):417-422. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_137_17.
5
Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.预制种植体基台的 CAD/CAM 全瓷冠固位:黏结剂和基台表面积对其影响的体外对比研究。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Oct;21(7):523-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00847.x. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
6
Color change of CAD-CAM materials and composite resin cements after thermocycling.CAD-CAM 材料和复合树脂水门汀在冷热循环后的颜色变化。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Oct;120(4):546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
7
Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing.水泥厚度和粘结对 CAD/CAM 陶瓷冠失效负荷的影响:多物理场有限元分析和单调试验。
Dent Mater. 2012 Aug;28(8):e99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
Effect of occlusal groove on abutment, crown thickness, and cement-type on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.咬合沟对单块氧化锆全冠基牙、冠厚度及粘结剂类型对其断裂载荷的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2018 Sep 30;37(5):843-850. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-350. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.优化无金属复合树脂冠的制备设计。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):211-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60180-8.
10
Influence of Tooth Mold Materials in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crown Destructive Test.复合树脂 CAD/CAM 冠破坏性试验中牙模材料的影响。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2021 Mar 13;62(1):15-26. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0028. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status and perspective of CAD/CAM-produced resin composite crowns: a review of clinical effectiveness.计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)制作的树脂复合冠的现状与展望:临床疗效综述
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Nov;56(1):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 25.