Suppr超能文献

POEMS 综合征的一线治疗方法哪种最好:自体移植、马法兰和地塞米松,还是来那度胺和地塞米松?

What is the best first-line treatment for POEMS syndrome: autologous transplantation, melphalan and dexamethasone, or lenalidomide and dexamethasone?

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2019 Apr;33(4):1023-1029. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0391-2. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

Abstract

POEMS syndrome is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia. This study compared the responses to and survival of 347 POEMS syndrome patients given three first-line treatment regimens: autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT, N = 165) and melphalan + dexamethasone (MDex, N = 79), or lenalidomide + dexamethasone (LDex, N = 103). After a median 45-month follow-up, overall hematologic complete remission (CR) was 46.4%, vascular endothelial growth factor complete remission (CR) was 55.1%, and neurological remission (R) was 93.8%. CR was better with ASCT (49.7%) than with MDex (37.7%, p = 0.001). CR was better with ASCT (66.2%) than with MDex (38.5%, p = 0.001) or LDex (47.7%, p = 0.008). Differences in R achieved by three regimens (91.5% vs. 100% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.234) were not significant. Overall 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 80.5% and overall 3-year overall survival (OS) was 90.8%. PFS was 87.6% with ASCT and 64.9% with LDex (p = 0.003). OS in the three regimens did not differ (p = 0.079). In medium-high risk patients, ASCT had better CR and CR than MDex, and better PFS than LDex. Therefore, although all three treatments had reasonable responses and survivals, patients with higher risk may benefit more from ASCT treatment.

摘要

POEMS 综合征是一种罕见的浆细胞疾病。本研究比较了 347 例 POEMS 综合征患者接受三种一线治疗方案(自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT,N=165)、马法兰+地塞米松(MDex,N=79)和来那度胺+地塞米松(LDex,N=103))的反应和生存情况。中位随访 45 个月后,总体血液学完全缓解(CR)率为 46.4%,血管内皮生长因子完全缓解(CR)率为 55.1%,神经缓解(R)率为 93.8%。ASCT 的 CR (49.7%)优于 MDex(37.7%,p=0.001)。ASCT 的 CR(66.2%)优于 MDex(38.5%,p=0.001)或 LDex(47.7%,p=0.008)。三种方案的 R (91.5% vs. 100% vs. 93.8%,p=0.234)差异无统计学意义。总体 3 年无进展生存(PFS)率为 80.5%,总体 3 年总生存(OS)率为 90.8%。ASCT 的 PFS 为 87.6%,LDex 的 PFS 为 64.9%(p=0.003)。三种方案的 OS 无差异(p=0.079)。在中高危患者中,ASCT 的 CR 和 CR 优于 MDex,PFS 优于 LDex。因此,虽然三种治疗方法均有合理的缓解率和生存率,但高危患者可能从 ASCT 治疗中获益更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9da/6756085/59a64c7f086c/41375_2019_391_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验