• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线自我指导干预赌博障碍:随机对照试验。

Online Self-Directed Interventions for Gambling Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):635-651. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09830-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-019-09830-7
PMID:30701377
Abstract

Self-directed treatments for gambling disorder have been developed to attract individuals who are reluctant to seek formal treatment. Self-directed treatments provide individuals with information and support to initiate a recovery program without attending formal treatment. In this study, an online version of a previously evaluated telephone-based intervention package is compared to a brief online normative feedback intervention called Check Your Gambling. In a randomized controlled trial design, participants with gambling problems who were not interested in formal treatment (N = 181) were recruited through media announcements. After a baseline telephone assessment, participants were assigned to have access to either the brief Check Your Gambling, or the extended self-management tools intervention. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months post baseline by blinded interviewers. Participant nominated collaterals were contacted to validate self-reported gambling involvement. The follow-up rate at 12 months was 78%. Participants in both conditions showed significant reductions in days of gambling and problem severity but no differences between conditions were found, contrary to the primary hypothesis. Lack of previous treatment for gambling and higher baseline self-efficacy predicted fewer days of gambling in both conditions. Self-efficacy increased over time but did not appear to mediate changes in gambling. Participants who were most engaged in the extended online program showed better outcomes. Those with low engagement showed a slower trajectory of change but equivalent improvements by 12 months. The extended online intervention was not associated with better outcomes than the brief Check Your Gambling intervention. Future research needs to explore the attractiveness, uptake, and effectiveness of online interventions with and without therapist support to understand their potential role in gambling disorder treatment systems.Trial Registration ISRCTN06220098.

摘要

自我指导的赌博障碍治疗方法旨在吸引那些不愿意寻求正规治疗的个体。自我指导的治疗方法为个体提供信息和支持,以便在不参加正规治疗的情况下启动康复计划。在这项研究中,将比较一种先前评估过的基于电话的干预方案的在线版本和一种称为“检查您的赌博”的简短在线规范反馈干预措施。采用随机对照试验设计,通过媒体公告招募对正规治疗不感兴趣的有赌博问题的参与者(N=181)。在基线电话评估后,将参与者分配至接受简短的“检查您的赌博”或扩展的自我管理工具干预。通过盲法访谈者在 3、6 和 12 个月的基线后进行随访评估。联系参与者提名的陪衬者以验证自我报告的赌博参与情况。12 个月的随访率为 78%。两种情况下的参与者在赌博天数和问题严重程度上都显著减少,但与主要假设相反,两种情况下均未发现差异。缺乏以往的赌博治疗和较高的基线自我效能感预测两种情况下的赌博天数更少。自我效能感随时间增加,但似乎不会影响赌博行为的变化。在扩展的在线计划中最投入的参与者表现出更好的结果。那些投入度低的参与者变化轨迹较慢,但到 12 个月时,改善情况相当。与简短的“检查您的赌博”干预相比,扩展的在线干预并未带来更好的结果。未来的研究需要探讨有和没有治疗师支持的在线干预措施的吸引力、采用率和有效性,以了解它们在赌博障碍治疗系统中的潜在作用。试验注册 ISRCTN06220098。

相似文献

1
Online Self-Directed Interventions for Gambling Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.在线自我指导干预赌博障碍:随机对照试验。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):635-651. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09830-7.
2
Internet-based interventions for disordered gamblers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of online self-directed cognitive-behavioural motivational therapy.基于互联网的干预措施对病态赌徒的影响:在线自我导向认知行为动机治疗随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 8;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-10.
3
A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.一项针对问题赌徒的个性化反馈干预的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031586. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Augmenting an online self-directed intervention for gambling disorder with a single motivational interview: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.增强在线自我指导干预赌博障碍与单一动机访谈:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Dec 20;22(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05912-3.
5
A Self-Guided Internet-Based Intervention for the Reduction of Gambling Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一种基于互联网的自助式干预措施,用于减少赌博症状:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417282. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17282.
6
A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial.简短自助工具包干预赌博问题:一项随机多地点试验。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Apr;82(2):278-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x.
7
Online interventions for problem gamblers with and without co-occurring mental health symptoms: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对有和没有共病心理健康症状的问题赌徒的在线干预:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:624. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3291-7.
8
A self-guided Internet-based intervention for individuals with gambling problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对有赌博问题者的基于互联网的自助干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 23;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3176-z.
9
A randomized controlled trial of a single session motivational intervention for concerned gamblers.一项单次动机干预对有顾虑的赌徒的随机对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2009 May;47(5):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
10
Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better.病态赌徒简短动机治疗的随机试验:并非越多越好。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):950-960. doi: 10.1037/a0016318.

引用本文的文献

1
Gambling disorder comorbidity a narrative review.赌博障碍共病:一项叙述性综述
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2025 Dec;27(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2025.2484288. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Mandatory verses voluntary self-tests for new online casino customers: effect on engagement, quality, gambling behavior and use of responsible gambling measures.新在线赌场客户的强制测试与自愿自测:对参与度、质量、赌博行为及负责任赌博措施使用情况的影响
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Feb 20;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01173-4.
3
A Self-Applied Psychological Treatment for Gambling-Related Problems via The Internet: A Pilot, Feasibility Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial.简短电话干预对问题赌博的效果:一项随机对照试验
Addiction. 2018 May;113(5):883-895. doi: 10.1111/add.14149. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
2
Internet-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.互联网辅助认知行为疗法
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;40(4):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial.自助认知行为治疗方案对问题赌徒的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
一种通过互联网自我实施的针对赌博相关问题的心理治疗方法:一项初步的、可行性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1623-1651. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10318-2. Epub 2024 May 25.
4
Definitions and assessments of recovery from gambling disorder: A scoping review.赌博障碍康复的定义和评估:范围综述。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Mar 29;13(2):354-412. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00008. Print 2024 Jun 26.
5
Evaluating the impact of motivational interviewing on engagement and outcomes in a web-based self-help intervention for gambling disorder: A randomised controlled trial.评估动机性访谈对基于网络的赌博障碍自助干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2024 Jan 4;35:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100707. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Internet-delivered therapist-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for gambling disorder: a randomized controlled trial.互联网提供的治疗师辅助认知行为疗法治疗赌博障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 11;14:1243826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1243826. eCollection 2023.
7
The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial.在赌博求助热线背景下,对一项有治疗师支持的针对赌博问题个体的简短互联网认知行为疗法项目的评估:一项随机试点试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Feb 17;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7.
8
Internet-based interventions for behavioral addictions: A systematic review.基于互联网的行为成瘾干预措施:系统评价。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Aug 4;11(3):620-642. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00054. Print 2022 Sep 26.
9
User engagement with technology-mediated self-guided interventions for addictions: scoping review protocol.用户对基于技术的自我引导干预成瘾的参与情况:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e064324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064324.
10
A Normative Feedback Intervention on Gambling Behavior-A Longitudinal Study of Post-Intervention Gambling Practices in At-Risk Gamblers.一项关于赌博行为的规范性反馈干预——对高危赌徒干预后赌博行为的纵向研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 31;13:602846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.602846. eCollection 2022.
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):581-595. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1.
4
Efficacy of a Self-Help Treatment for At-Risk and Pathological Gamblers.高危及病态赌博者自助治疗的疗效。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):561-580. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z.
5
Efficacy of face-to-face versus self-guided treatments for disordered gambling: A meta-analysis.面对面治疗与自助治疗对病态赌博的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):142-162. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.034.
6
A systematic review of treatments for problem gambling.问题赌博治疗方法的系统评价。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(8):951-961. doi: 10.1037/adb0000290. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial.基于互联网的认知行为疗法与监测、反馈和支持对赌博问题的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):993-1010. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y.
8
Examining personalized feedback interventions for gambling disorders: A systematic review.审视针对赌博障碍的个性化反馈干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Behav Addict. 2016 Mar;5(1):1-10. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.006.
9
The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non-Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.三种基于互联网的心理治疗方式对未寻求治疗的在线问题赌徒的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 15;18(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4752.
10
The efficacy of motivational interviewing for disordered gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis.动机性访谈对赌博障碍的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Addict Behav. 2015 Apr;43:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 26.