Department of Nursing, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Feb;16(1):29-35. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12348. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
In previous studies about performance or factors affecting pressure ulcer (PU) care, old tools with nonupdated contents about the prevention and intervention of PU have been mainly used. Thus, there is little known how well evidence-based PU care is performed and what its' influencing factors are recently.
This study aimed to evaluate the PU care performance, based on evidence-based practice guidelines, and identify factors affecting it while considering nurses' individual and institutional characteristics.
We recruited 199 nurses involved in PU care, from August 20 to September 10, 2016, at two PU-related academic conferences in Korea. To examine PU care performance and knowledge as a related factor, we developed tools based on recent guidelines. To identify factors affecting PU care performance, we examined nurses' (individual level) and their institutions' (institutional level) characteristics, and analyzed using a hierarchical multiple regression test.
Mean PU care performance of nurses was rated 3.99 out of 5. Performance level in "wound care: debridement"; "pain control"; "prevention skin care"; "incontinence management"; "supporting surface"; and "nutrition in PU prevention and treatment" was below average. Interest in PU care (β = .28, p = <.001), the main PU manager in a ward being a wound, ostomy, continence nurse (β = .22, p = .013), and an institution with a nursing practice guideline for PU care (β = .16, p = .02) were identified as significant factors affecting a good PU care performance.
To improve nurses' evidence-based PU care performance, nurses must recognize PU care's importance and take responsibility for improving their own performance. At the institutional level, systematic evidence-based guidelines and support systems, such as activating wound specialists, must be implemented. The academic society can support these initiatives by updating continuously the national guideline on PU prevention and management for ease of use by nurses or institutions.
在之前关于压力性溃疡(PU)护理表现或影响因素的研究中,主要使用的是内容没有更新的旧工具,这些工具与 PU 的预防和干预无关。因此,最近压力性溃疡护理的实施情况以及影响其实施的因素知之甚少。
本研究旨在根据循证实践指南评估压力性溃疡护理的表现,并在考虑护士个体和机构特征的情况下,确定影响压力性溃疡护理的因素。
我们于 2016 年 8 月 20 日至 9 月 10 日,在韩国的两次与压力性溃疡相关的学术会议上,招募了 199 名参与压力性溃疡护理的护士。为了检查压力性溃疡护理表现和知识作为相关因素,我们根据最新指南开发了工具。为了确定影响压力性溃疡护理表现的因素,我们检查了护士(个体水平)及其机构(机构水平)的特征,并使用分层多元回归测试进行了分析。
护士压力性溃疡护理表现的平均评分为 5 分制的 3.99 分。在“伤口护理:清创”、“疼痛控制”、“预防皮肤护理”、“失禁管理”、“支持表面”和“营养在压力性溃疡预防和治疗中的作用”等方面的表现水平低于平均水平。对压力性溃疡护理的兴趣(β=0.28,p<0.001)、病房中主要的压力性溃疡、造口术、失禁护士(β=0.22,p=0.013)以及有压力性溃疡护理实践指南的机构(β=0.16,p=0.02)被确定为影响良好压力性溃疡护理表现的显著因素。
为了提高护士基于证据的压力性溃疡护理表现,护士必须认识到压力性溃疡护理的重要性,并为提高自身表现负责。在机构层面,必须实施系统的基于证据的指南和支持系统,例如激活伤口专家。学术协会可以通过不断更新国家压力性溃疡预防和管理指南来支持这些举措,以便护士或机构更方便地使用。