a Documentation and Quality , Danish Cancer Society , Copenhagen , Denmark.
b Department of Oncology , The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):596-602. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1560496. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Adequate and timely monitoring of adverse events to cancer treatment is from our view dependent on a suitable Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool developed for the specific patient population based on cytostatic drugs included in the treatment. Therefore, a systematic method for construction of PRO questionnaires including selection of the appropriate questions is needed. The purpose of the present study was to develop and test a method of item selection for a PRO questionnaire to monitor adverse events in oncologic routine treatment of metastatic prostate cancer patients. Documentation on common symptomatic adverse events for the three drugs was collected from five different sources: 1) FDA product summary information; 2) EMA product summary information; 3) phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) leading to drug approval; 4) audit of the electronic patient files focusing on the oncologist's documentation of adverse events and 5) individual patient interview ( = 16) focusing on adverse events. The Patient Reported Outcome of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was used as PRO item library. Selected symptoms were transformed into corresponding PRO-CTCAE questions. The questionnaire was tested by patients in a pilot test ( = 12). Patients for interviews and pilot testing were included by purposive sampling. A method for constructing a PRO questionnaire was developed, and a questionnaire of 25 PRO-CTCAE symptoms with 46 questions including an open write-in space for additional adverse events was constructed and tested. This study demonstrates a systematic method to select questions on adverse events for a PRO questionnaire in a specific cancer population receiving oncologic treatment. The present study reveals that audit of patient files and patient interviews in our setting only add little to the information on adverse events obtained from FDA, EMA and RCT. The obtained questionnaire was found useful and acceptable by patients.
充分且及时地监测癌症治疗的不良反应,我们认为这取决于为接受包含在治疗中的细胞毒性药物中的特定患者人群开发的合适的患者报告结局(PRO)工具。因此,需要一种系统的方法来构建 PRO 问卷,包括选择适当的问题。本研究旨在开发和测试一种用于构建 PRO 问卷以监测转移性前列腺癌患者肿瘤常规治疗中不良反应的项目选择方法。从五个不同来源收集了三种药物常见症状不良反应的文档:1)FDA 产品总结信息;2)EMA 产品总结信息;3)导致药物批准的 3 期随机对照试验(RCT);4)专注于医生记录不良反应的电子患者档案审核;5)16 名患者的个人访谈( = 16),重点关注不良反应。患者报告的常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)用作 PRO 项目库。选择的症状转化为相应的 PRO-CTCAE 问题。该问卷通过试点测试中的患者进行了测试( = 12)。通过目的抽样纳入访谈和试点测试的患者。开发了一种构建 PRO 问卷的方法,并构建和测试了一种包含 25 个 PRO-CTCAE 症状和 46 个问题的问卷,其中包括用于额外不良反应的开放写入空间。本研究展示了一种在接受肿瘤治疗的特定癌症人群中为 PRO 问卷选择不良反应问题的系统方法。本研究表明,在我们的环境中,对患者文件的审核和患者访谈仅增加了从 FDA、EMA 和 RCT 获得的不良反应信息的一点。患者认为获得的问卷既有用又可接受。