文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).

作者信息

Hagelstein V, Ortland I, Wilmer A, Mitchell S A, Jaehde U

机构信息

Institute of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2294-2299. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw422. Epub 2016 Sep 28.


DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdw422
PMID:27681863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6267864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integrating the patient's perspective has become an increasingly important component of adverse event reporting. The National Cancer Institute has developed a Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™). This instrument has been translated into German and linguistically validated; however, its quantitative measurement properties have not been evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A German language survey that included 31 PRO-CTCAE items, as well as the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ), was distributed at 10 cancer treatment settings in Germany and Austria. Item quality was assessed by analysis of acceptability and comprehensibility. Reliability was evaluated by using Cronbach's' alpha and validity by principal components analysis (PCA), multitrait-multimethod matrix (MTMM) and known groups validity techniques. RESULTS: Of 660 surveys distributed to the study centres, 271 were returned (return rate 41%), and data from 262 were available for analysis. Participants' median age was 59.7 years, and 69.5% of the patients were female. Analysis of item quality supported the comprehensibility of the 31 PRO-CTCAE items. Reliability was very good; Cronbach's' alpha correlation coefficients were >0.9 for almost all item clusters. Construct validity of the PRO-CTCAE core item set was shown by identifying 10 conceptually meaningful item clusters via PCA. Moreover, construct validity was confirmed by the MTMM: monotrait-heteromethod comparison showed 100% high correlation, whereas heterotrait-monomethod comparison indicated 0% high correlation. Known groups validity was supported; PRO-CTCAE scores were significantly lower for those with impaired versus preserved health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: A set of 31 items drawn from the German PRO-CTCAE item library demonstrated favourable measurement properties. These findings add to the body of evidence that PRO-CTCAE provides a rigorous method to capture patient self-reports of symptomatic toxicity for use in cancer clinical trials.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).

Ann Oncol. 2016-12

[2]
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020-5

[3]
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

JAMA Oncol. 2015-11

[4]
Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events.

BMC Cancer. 2021-7-27

[5]
Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016-2-19

[6]
Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period.

Qual Life Res. 2023-7

[7]
Comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 and PRO-CTCAE™ Questionnaires on Six Symptom Items.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018-5-25

[8]
Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019-4-1

[9]
Linguistic validation of the simplified Chinese version of the US National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).

BMC Cancer. 2020-11-26

[10]
Danish Translation and Linguistic Validation of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Implementation of an electronic medication management support system in hospitalised polypharmacy patients: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial (TOP study).

BMJ Open. 2025-4-15

[2]
Health information management of older, multimorbid patients in German primary care: feasibility and first results of the outcome measures of a cluster-randomised controlled pilot trial - HYPERION-TransCare.

BMC Prim Care. 2025-4-5

[3]
Impact of immigration background on feasibility of electronic patient-reported outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024-12-18

[4]
Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Multimorbidity: The Agreement Between Patient and General Practitioner-Reported Drugs Observed in a Pilot cRCT.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024-10-21

[5]
[Patient-reported outcomes-the role of the patient's subjective perspective for research and clinical care].

Urologie. 2024-9

[6]
Medication Risks and Their Association with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Inpatients with Cancer.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-5-31

[7]
Implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention to improve information availability at the interface between inpatient and outpatient care in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy (HYPERION-TransCare) - study protocol for a pilot and feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial in general practice in Germany.

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023-8-22

[8]
Developing tumor-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets: analysis of a cross-sectional survey in three German outpatient cancer centers.

BMC Cancer. 2023-7-5

[9]
Systematic symptom screening in patients with advanced cancer treated in certified oncology centers: results of the prospective multicenter German KeSBa project.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-9

[10]
Serious Adverse Events Reporting in Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials of Colorectal Cancer Treatments: A Systematic Analysis.

Front Pharmacol. 2021-11-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

JAMA Oncol. 2015-11

[2]
Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-9-29

[3]
Linguistic and content validation of a German-language PRO-CTCAE-based patient-reported outcomes instrument to evaluate the late effect symptom experience after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015-2

[4]
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-7-8

[5]
Symptom clusters in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of observational studies.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014-9

[6]
Use of patient-reported outcomes to improve the predictive accuracy of clinician-reported adverse events.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011-12-21

[7]
Patient-reported outcomes in drug safety evaluation.

Ann Oncol. 2009-12

[8]
A test for symmetry in contingency tables.

J Am Stat Assoc. 1948-12

[9]
Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology.

J Clin Oncol. 2007-11-10

[10]
Development and validation of patient-reported outcomes measures for overactive bladder: a review of concepts.

Urology. 2006-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索