School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Addiction. 2019 Oct;114 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):24-34. doi: 10.1111/add.14570. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
To determine whether a simple combination of level of smoking and level of vaping results in a useful typology for characterizing smoking and vaping behaviours.
Cross-sectional data from adults (≥ 18 years) in the 2016 wave 1 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey in the United States (n = 2291), England (n = 3591), Australia (n = 1376) and Canada (n = 2784) were used. Participants who either smoked, vaped or concurrently used both at least monthly were included and divided into eight groups based on use frequency of each product (daily, non-daily, no current use). This resulted in four concurrent use groups (predominant smokers, dual daily users, predominant vapers and concurrent non-daily users). These groups were compared with each other and with the four exclusive use groups, on socio-demographics, nicotine dependence, beliefs and attitudes about both products, and quit-related measures using data weighted to reference population surveys in each country.
Of the sample, 10.8% were concurrent users, with daily smokers vaping non-daily (predominant smokers), constituting 51.6% of this group. All eight categories differed from other categories on at least some measures. Concurrent daily nicotine users reported higher levels of indicators of nicotine dependence, and generally more positive attitudes toward both smoking and vaping than concurrent non-daily users. Among daily nicotine users, compared with exclusive daily smokers, reports of interest in quitting were higher in all concurrent use groups. Dual daily users had the most positive attitudes about smoking overall, and saw it as the least denormalized, and at the same time were equally interested in quitting as other concurrent users and were most likely to report intending to continue vaping.
In Australia, Canada, England and the United States in 2016, daily nicotine users differed considerably from non-daily nicotine users. Among daily nicotine users, dual daily users (those who smoke and vape concurrently) should be treated as a distinct grouping when studying relationships between smoking and vaping. The eight-level typology characterizing concurrent and exclusive use of smoking and vaping should be considered when studying both products.
确定吸烟和蒸气吸入的水平组合是否能为描述吸烟和蒸气吸入行为提供有用的分类法。
使用了美国(n=2291)、英国(n=3591)、澳大利亚(n=1376)和加拿大(n=2784)2016 年第 1 波 ITC 四国吸烟和蒸气吸入调查中成年人(≥18 岁)的横断面数据。将至少每月使用过吸烟或蒸气吸入或同时使用这两种产品的参与者纳入研究,并根据每种产品的使用频率(每日、非每日、当前未使用)将他们分为八组。这导致了四个同时使用组(主要吸烟者、双重每日使用者、主要蒸气吸入者和同时非每日使用者)。使用在每个国家参考人群调查中加权的数据,将这些组与其他组以及四个单独使用组在社会人口统计学、尼古丁依赖、对两种产品的信念和态度以及与戒烟相关的措施方面进行了比较。
在样本中,有 10.8%是同时使用者,其中每日吸烟者非每日蒸气吸入(主要吸烟者),占该组的 51.6%。所有八类在至少某些措施上与其他类别不同。同时每日尼古丁使用者报告了更高水平的尼古丁依赖指标,并且对吸烟和蒸气吸入的态度普遍比同时非每日使用者更积极。在每日尼古丁使用者中,与单独每日吸烟者相比,所有同时使用组中对戒烟的兴趣报告都更高。双重每日使用者对吸烟的总体态度最为积极,认为吸烟最不被非规范化,同时与其他同时使用者一样对戒烟感兴趣,并且最有可能报告打算继续蒸气吸入。
在 2016 年的澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国,每日尼古丁使用者与非每日尼古丁使用者有很大的不同。在每日尼古丁使用者中,双重每日使用者(同时吸烟和蒸气吸入者)在研究吸烟和蒸气吸入之间的关系时应被视为一个不同的群体。在研究这两种产品时,应考虑将描述吸烟和蒸气吸入的同时使用和单独使用的八水平分类法。