Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0631 La Jolla, San Diego, 92093-0631, CA, United States.
Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, D.C., United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
With no established standard for assessing tobacco dependence (TD) across tobacco products in surveys, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study provides a unique platform for examining the psychometric properties and validity of multiple indicators of tobacco dependence across a range of tobacco products.
A U.S. nationally representative sample from the 32,320 adult Wave 1 interviews with analyses focused on 14,287 respondents who were current established users of tobacco products.
This analysis confirms a single primary latent construct underlying responses to TD indicators for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco products. Mutually exclusive past year tobacco-user groups included: cigarette only (n=8689), e-cigarette only (n=437), cigar only (traditional, cigarillo, or filtered) (n=706), hookah only (n=461), smokeless tobacco only (n=971), cigarette plus e-cigarette (n=709), and multiple tobacco product users (n=2314). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses supported use of 16 of the 24 examined TD indicators for comparisons across tobacco users. With cigarette users as a reference (mean=0.0, SD=1.0), we observed a range of TD with hookah (mean=-1.71) and cigar (mean=-1.92) only users being the lowest, and cigarette plus e-cigarette product users being the highest (mean=0.35). Regression models including sociodemographic factors supported concurrent validity with increased product use frequency and TD among cigarette-only (p<0.001), e-cigarette only (p<0.002), cigar (p<0.001), hookah only (p<0.001), and smokeless tobacco users (p<0.001).
The PATH Study Adult Wave 1 Questionnaire provided psychometrically valid measures of TD that enables future regulatory investigations of nicotine dependence across tobacco products.
由于在调查中没有针对各种烟草制品评估烟草依赖(TD)的既定标准,人口烟草与健康评估(PATH)研究为研究一系列烟草制品中 TD 的多种指标的心理测量特性和有效性提供了一个独特的平台。
来自 32320 名成年受访者中第 1 波访谈的美国全国代表性样本,分析重点是 14287 名目前为各种烟草制品的固定使用者的受访者。
该分析证实,在对香烟、电子烟、雪茄、水烟和无烟烟草制品的 TD 指标的反应背后存在一个单一的主要潜在结构。去年相互排斥的烟草使用者群体包括:仅香烟使用者(n=8689)、仅电子烟使用者(n=437)、仅雪茄使用者(传统雪茄、小雪茄或过滤雪茄)(n=706)、仅水烟使用者(n=461)、仅无烟烟草使用者(n=971)、香烟加电子烟使用者(n=709)和多种烟草制品使用者(n=2314)。差异项目功能分析(DIF)支持使用 24 个检查的 TD 指标中的 16 个进行跨烟草使用者的比较。以香烟使用者为参照(均值=0.0,标准差=1.0),我们观察到仅使用水烟(均值=-1.71)和雪茄(均值=-1.92)的 TD 范围最低,而香烟加电子烟产品使用者的 TD 范围最高(均值=0.35)。包括社会人口因素的回归模型支持与香烟唯一使用者(p<0.001)、电子烟唯一使用者(p<0.002)、雪茄唯一使用者(p<0.001)、水烟唯一使用者(p<0.001)和无烟烟草使用者(p<0.001)中产品使用频率和 TD 增加相关的同时效度。
PATH 研究成人第 1 波问卷提供了 TD 的心理测量有效度量,使未来能够对各种烟草制品中的尼古丁依赖进行监管调查。