• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光痔切除术治疗 II-III 度痔病的近期和远期疗效。

Short- and long-term outcomes of laser haemorrhoidoplasty for grade II-III haemorrhoidal disease.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.

Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jun;21(6):689-696. doi: 10.1111/codi.14572. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14572
PMID:30702197
Abstract

AIM

Laser haemorrhoidoplasty is associated with minimal postoperative pain and good symptom improvement in the short-term. However, less is known about its long-term efficacy. This study aims to determine the short- and long-term outcomes of laser haemorrhoidoplasty.

METHOD

Between October 2010 and May 2012, 50 consecutive patients with grade II-III haemorrhoids were treated with laser haemorrhoidoplasty. Short-term follow-up was assessed on days 1, 30 and 60 and long-term follow-up was at 5 years (haemorrhoidal stage reduction, pain, patient satisfaction, symptom improvement, incapacity for work, continence, complications, recurrence).

RESULTS

Short-term follow-up was achieved for all patients and long-term follow-up for 44/50 patients (88%). At short-term follow-up, haemorrhoidal stage reduction was documented in 49 (98%) patients. Complete or good symptom improvement was reported by 36/50 (72%) and 10/50 patients (20%) at 60 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 9/50 patients (18%) with three Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications (two fistulas, one incontinence), one grade IIIa (perianal thrombosis) and five grade I (one perianal thrombosis, two perianal eczema, one local bleeding, one anal fissure). Postoperative pain was low (visual analogue scale 0-1) at day 1 in 37/50 (74%), at day 30 in 47/50 (94%) and at day 60 in 50/50 patients (100%). After a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (SD 5.4 months) the recurrence rate was 34% (15/44 patients) with a median time to recurrence of 21 months (range 0.2-6 years).

CONCLUSION

Although laser haemorrhoidoplasty achieves a high short-term success rate with respect to stage reduction and symptom improvement, it is associated with a high rate of minor postoperative complications and long-term recurrence. Therefore, laser haemorrhoidoplasty should be used with caution.

摘要

目的

激光痔疮切除术在短期内与术后疼痛最小和良好的症状改善相关。然而,其长期疗效知之甚少。本研究旨在确定激光痔疮切除术的短期和长期疗效。

方法

2010 年 10 月至 2012 年 5 月,50 例 II-III 度痔患者接受了激光痔疮切除术。短期随访评估在第 1、30 和 60 天进行,长期随访在 5 年时进行(痔分期降低、疼痛、患者满意度、症状改善、工作能力丧失、控便能力、并发症、复发)。

结果

所有患者均完成了短期随访,44/50 例(88%)患者完成了长期随访。短期随访时,49 例(98%)患者痔分期降低。36/50 例(72%)和 10/50 例(20%)患者在 60 天时有完全或良好的症状改善。50 例患者中有 9 例(18%)发生术后并发症,其中 3 例为 Clavien-Dindo IIIb 级并发症(2 例瘘管,1 例失禁),1 例为 IIIa 级(肛周血栓形成),5 例为 I 级(1 例肛周血栓形成,2 例肛周湿疹,1 例局部出血,1 例肛裂)。术后第 1 天 37/50 例(74%)、第 30 天 47/50 例(94%)和第 60 天 50/50 例(100%)患者疼痛较轻(视觉模拟评分 0-1)。平均随访 5.4 年后(SD 5.4 个月),复发率为 34%(15/44 例),复发中位时间为 21 个月(范围 0.2-6 年)。

结论

尽管激光痔疮切除术在降低痔分期和改善症状方面具有较高的短期成功率,但与较高的术后并发症和长期复发率相关。因此,激光痔疮切除术应谨慎使用。

相似文献

1
Short- and long-term outcomes of laser haemorrhoidoplasty for grade II-III haemorrhoidal disease.激光痔切除术治疗 II-III 度痔病的近期和远期疗效。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jun;21(6):689-696. doi: 10.1111/codi.14572. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
2
The efficacy of laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease: An observational cohort study.激光痔切除术(LHP)治疗症状性痔病的疗效:一项观察性队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun;25(6):1202-1207. doi: 10.1111/codi.16514. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids.痔病术后不适和疼痛的处理:激光痔切除术,一种治疗有症状痔的微创方法。
Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):851-857. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00694-5. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
4
Comparison of Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty and Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy in Treating Grade III and Grade IV Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Randomised Study.比较激光痔切除术和 Ferguson 痔切除术治疗 III 度和 IV 度痔:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Jan;33(1):41-46. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.01.41.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pain and symptoms control following laser haemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic haemorrhoids: a new standard.系统评价和荟萃分析激光痔切除术与Milligan-Morgan 痔切除术治疗症状性痔的术后疼痛和症状控制:新标准。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Aug;37(8):1759-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04225-4. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids: a 3-year experience.经肛门痔动脉结扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔:3年经验
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;86(1-2):59-62. doi: 10.1111/ans.12816. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Study Protocol for the Use of Conventional Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Symptomatic Haemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规开放式痔切除术与激光痔切除术治疗症状性痔的研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Surg Res. 2020;61(6):201-208. doi: 10.1159/000513844. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up.HAL-RAR(多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术联合直肠肛管修复术)是一种治疗痔疮安全有效的手术方法。一项前瞻性研究两年随访结果。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
9
Transanal open haemorrhoidopexy: a well-tolerated, minimally invasive surgical method for haemorrhoids grade II to IV.经肛门开放式痔固定术:一种耐受性良好、微创的 II 至 IV 度痔的外科治疗方法。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Apr;94(4):714-718. doi: 10.1111/ans.18823. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
10
Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial.多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术治疗痔疮:一项多中心试验的结果
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):O10-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12779.

引用本文的文献

1
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations.激光痔切除术治疗症状性痔的最佳临床实践建议:LHP 建议。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Nov 23;29(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03022-1.
2
Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes.激光痔切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的倾向评分匹配分析:一年随访结果
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71477. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II-IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh.
孟加拉国II-IV度痔病的激光痔切除术治疗效果
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;86(11):6514-6520. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002621. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease.意大利结肠直肠病统一学会(Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia)关于急慢性痔病管理的指南。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):287-320. doi: 10.3393/ac.2023.00871.0124. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty.一种比较 980nm 与 1470nm 波长激光在痔切除术疗效的系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 24;39(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04690-z.
6
Clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessels suture ligation: a retrospective study in a single center.痔激光治疗中带血管结扎缝合术的临床疗效:单中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 2;28(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02940-4.
7
Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management.精准与效能:激光治疗在痔病管理中的作用探索综合综述
Cureus. 2024 May 9;16(5):e60011. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60011. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Ligasure Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Analysis.激光痔成形术与套扎痔切除术:一项对比分析。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 8;15(8):e43119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43119. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?激光技术在肛肠病学中的应用:它真的是未来的潮流吗?
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1759-1772. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01578-5. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
10
Modified ultrasound scalpel haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy for mixed haemorrhoids: a study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial.改良超声刀痔切除术与传统痔切除术治疗混合痔的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Feb 24;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07175-6.