Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Cheng Du Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Trials. 2023 Feb 24;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07175-6.
Haemorrhoids are common and frequently occurring diseases in the clinical setting, and severe haemorrhoids require surgical treatment. There are various surgical methods to treat haemorrhoids, but each has advantages and disadvantages. In recent years, ultrasonic scalpels have been used in haemorrhoid surgery and have achieved good results. Ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy is safer and more effective in the surgical treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids, with less intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative pain, and fewer complications than diathermic therapy, electrosurgical haemorrhoidectomy, PROXIMATE® PPH haemorrhoidal circular stapler haemorrhoidopexy (PPH), and traditional haemorrhoidectomy. In previous reports, the majority of ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomies were performed as open procedures, with only the body of the haemorrhoid removed with the ultrasonic scalpel and the wound left open for drainage and natural healing. However, we performed a preliminary experiment with 12 patients who underwent open ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy in the early stage. The results showed that 8 patients had different degrees of postoperative bleeding, and 4 of them required a second haemostatic surgery under anaesthesia. Therefore, we modified the open ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy procedure by removing the mucosa of the internal haemorrhoid and closing the base of the incision with figure-eight penetrating sutures and designed this study protocol to evaluate its clinical efficacy and safety.
A randomised single-blind parallel-controlled trial is proposed for this project, and patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be divided into a test group and a control group, with 39 patients in each group. The experimental group will be treated with modified ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy, and the control group will be treated with the Milligan-Morgan operation. The effectiveness of modified ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids will be objectively evaluated, including the incision healing time and the time for patients to return to normal activities, postoperative complications, evaluations of anal function 3 months and 6 months after surgery, an evaluation of quality of life 6 months after surgery, and an evaluation of the patient satisfaction rate 6 months after surgery. The safety assessment will consider all adverse and serious adverse events associated with the study treatment.
The study was approved by the ethics committee. The first patient was registered on July 1 2021. The purpose of this trial will be to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the modified ultrasonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy procedure for the treatment of mixed haemorrhoids and to provide an evidence base for the clinical promotion and application of the procedure. A limitation of this study is that only the patients will be single-blinded because the researchers and the patients cannot be blinded at the same time, which may produce certain bias in the results. In addition, the sample size of this study will be small, and the test results will only represent the findings from this clinical trial. In later stages, the sample size needs to be further expanded to improve the level of evidence. Despite its limitations, we hope the present study will help provide a more optimised surgical approach in the selection of haemorrhoid surgery.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration ID: ChiCTR2100047229). Registered on June 11, 2021.
痔疮是临床常见且多发的疾病,严重的痔疮需要手术治疗。治疗痔疮有多种手术方法,但各有优缺点。近年来,超声刀已应用于痔疮手术,并取得了良好的效果。超声刀痔切除术在治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔疮时更安全、更有效,术中出血量少,术后疼痛少,并发症少,与电热疗法、电外科痔切除术、PROXIMATE® PPH 痔环形吻合术(PPH)和传统痔切除术相比。在以往的报告中,大多数超声刀痔切除术都是开放性手术,只有用超声刀切除痔体,伤口敞开引流和自然愈合。然而,我们对 12 例早期接受开放性超声刀痔切除术的患者进行了初步实验,结果显示有 8 例患者术后出现不同程度的出血,其中 4 例需要在麻醉下进行第二次止血手术。因此,我们对开放性超声刀痔切除术进行了改良,切除内痔黏膜,并用 8 字贯穿缝合关闭切口,并设计了本研究方案来评估其临床疗效和安全性。
本研究拟采用随机单盲平行对照试验,纳入符合标准的患者分为试验组和对照组,每组 39 例。试验组采用改良超声刀痔切除术治疗,对照组采用Milligan-Morgan 手术治疗。客观评价改良超声刀痔切除术治疗痔疮的疗效,包括切口愈合时间和患者恢复正常活动的时间、术后并发症、术后 3 个月和 6 个月肛门功能评估、术后 6 个月生活质量评估和术后 6 个月患者满意度评估。安全性评估将考虑与研究治疗相关的所有不良事件和严重不良事件。
本研究已获得伦理委员会批准。首例患者于 2021 年 7 月 1 日注册。本试验的目的是评估改良超声刀痔切除术治疗混合痔的临床疗效和安全性,为该术式的临床推广应用提供循证医学依据。本研究的局限性在于,由于研究者和患者不能同时被蒙蔽,只有患者会被单盲,这可能会给结果带来一定的偏差。此外,本研究的样本量较小,试验结果仅代表本临床试验的结果。在后期阶段,需要进一步扩大样本量,以提高证据水平。尽管存在局限性,但我们希望本研究能够为痔疮手术的选择提供一种更优化的手术方法。
中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2100047229)。注册于 2021 年 6 月 11 日。