• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高原骑行:绝对功率输出较低是总效率降低的主要原因。

Cycling at Altitude: Lower Absolute Power Output as the Main Cause of Lower Gross Efficiency.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Sep 1;14(8):1117-1123. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0221.

DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0221
PMID:30702371
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although cyclists often compete at altitude, the effect of altitude on gross efficiency (GE) remains inconclusive.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of altitude on GE at the same relative exercise intensity and at the same absolute power output (PO) and to determine the effect of altitude on the change in GE during high-intensity exercise.

METHODS

Twenty-one trained men performed 3 maximal incremental tests and 5 GE tests at sea level, 1500 m, and 2500 m of acute simulated altitude. The GE tests at altitude were performed once at the same relative exercise intensity and once at the same absolute PO as at sea level.

RESULTS

Altitude resulted in an unclear effect at 1500 m (-3.8%; ±3.3% [90% confidence limit]) and most likely negative effect at 2500 m (-6.3%; ±1.7%) on pre-GE, when determined at the same relative exercise intensity. When pre-GE was determined at the same absolute PO, unclear differences in GE were found (-1.5%; ±2.6% at 1500 m; -1.7%; ±2.4% at 2500 m). The effect of altitude on the decrease in GE during high-intensity exercise was unclear when determined at the same relative exercise intensity (-0.4%; ±2.8% at 1500 m; -0.7%; ±1.9% at 2500 m). When GE was determined at the same absolute PO, altitude resulted in a substantially smaller decrease in GE (2.8%; ±2.4% at 1500 m; 5.5%; ±2.9% at 2500 m).

CONCLUSION

The lower GE found at altitude when exercise is performed at the same relative exercise intensity is mainly caused by the lower PO at which cyclists exercise.

摘要

背景

尽管自行车运动员经常在高海拔地区比赛,但海拔对总效率(GE)的影响仍不确定。

目的

研究在相同相对运动强度和相同绝对功率输出(PO)下海拔对 GE 的影响,并确定海拔对高强度运动中 GE 变化的影响。

方法

21 名训练有素的男性在海平面、1500 米和 2500 米的急性模拟海拔高度进行了 3 次最大增量测试和 5 次 GE 测试。在海拔高度进行的 GE 测试,一次在与海平面相同的相对运动强度下进行,一次在与海平面相同的绝对 PO 下进行。

结果

当在相同的相对运动强度下确定预 GE 时,海拔在 1500 米处产生了不明确的效果(-3.8%;±3.3%[90%置信区间]),而在 2500 米处可能产生了负面效果(-6.3%;±1.7%)。当在相同的绝对 PO 下确定预 GE 时,GE 出现了不明确的差异(-1.5%;±2.6%在 1500 米;-1.7%;±2.4%在 2500 米)。当在相同的相对运动强度下确定高强度运动中 GE 的下降时,海拔对其的影响并不明确(-0.4%;±2.8%在 1500 米;-0.7%;±1.9%在 2500 米)。当在相同的绝对 PO 下确定 GE 时,海拔导致 GE 的下降幅度明显减小(2.8%;±2.4%在 1500 米;5.5%;±2.9%在 2500 米)。

结论

当以相同的相对运动强度进行运动时,在海拔高度下发现的较低 GE 主要是由于自行车运动员的较低 PO 所致。

相似文献

1
Cycling at Altitude: Lower Absolute Power Output as the Main Cause of Lower Gross Efficiency.高原骑行:绝对功率输出较低是总效率降低的主要原因。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Sep 1;14(8):1117-1123. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0221.
2
Is gross efficiency lower at acute simulated altitude than at sea level?在急性模拟高海拔环境下的总效率是否低于海平面?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 May;8(3):319-22. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.8.3.319. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
3
The effect of acute simulated moderate altitude on power, performance and pacing strategies in well-trained cyclists.急性模拟中度海拔对训练有素的自行车运动员的功率、表现和配速策略的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Dec;102(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0554-0. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
4
Recovery of Cycling Gross Efficiency After Time-Trial Exercise.计时赛运动后自行车循环总效率的恢复。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Sep 1;13(8):1028-1033. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0429. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Factors affecting gross efficiency in cycling.影响骑行总效率的因素。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;33(11):880-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306285. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
Effects of acute simulated altitude on the maximal lactate steady state in humans.急性模拟高原对人体最大乳酸稳态的影响。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2024 Aug 1;327(2):R195-R207. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00065.2024. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Seasonal changes in aerobic fitness indices in elite cyclists.精英自行车运动员有氧适能指标的季节性变化。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Aug;33(4):735-42. doi: 10.1139/H08-046.
8
Measure of efficiency and knee isokinetic strength in bike messengers and non-cyclist athletes.自行车信使和非自行车运动员的效率和膝关节等速力量测量。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Oct;60(10):1322-1328. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10789-8.
9
Ventilatory acclimatisation is beneficial for high-intensity exercise at altitude in elite cyclists.通气适应对精英自行车运动员在高原进行高强度运动有益。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2016 Nov;16(8):895-902. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1139190. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
No differences in cycling efficiency between world-class and recreational cyclists.世界级自行车运动员和业余自行车运动员在骑行效率上没有差异。
Int J Sports Med. 2004 Jul;25(5):374-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815848.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Sodium Phosphate Supplementation on the Cardiorespiratory System and Gross Efficiency during Exercise under Hypoxia in Male Cyclists: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study.补充磷酸盐对男性自行车运动员在低氧下运动时心肺系统和总效率的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 11;13(10):3556. doi: 10.3390/nu13103556.
2
Do Surface Slope and Posture Influence Lower Extremity Joint Kinetics during Cycling?表面斜率和姿势是否会影响骑行时下肢关节动力学?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082846.