Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Unit of Sports Medicine, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Oct;60(10):1322-1328. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10789-8.
Gross efficiency in cycling (GE) seems correlated with lower-body strength. This study investigated GE at four different pedaling rates and its relationship with an isokinetic strength test in bike messengers (BM) and experienced athletes non-bike messengers (NBM).
Eight BM and eight NBM completed a maximal incremental test to determine maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O
A difference in GE (except at 90 rpm), BLC and MAP/kg was found in favor of BM. The most efficient cadence was 60 rpm in both groups. Increased cadence resulted in decreased GE and increased HR and V̇O
This study is the first investigating performance and efficiency among BM. At equivalent power output, BM show a better GE than NBM. Those results are in line with previously described analysis in cyclists and explained by better aerobic capacity and training status. Isokinetic knee maximal strength and fatigability were not linked with GE, and thus does not appear appropriate for evaluating GE in cycling.
自行车运动的总效率(GE)似乎与下肢力量有关。本研究调查了自行车信使(BM)和有经验的非自行车信使(NBM)运动员在四种不同踏频下的 GE 及其与等速力量测试的关系。
8 名 BM 和 8 名 NBM 完成了最大增量测试,以确定最大有氧功率(MAP)和最大摄氧量(V̇O
BM 在 GE(除了在 90 rpm 时)、BLC 和 MAP/kg 方面存在差异。在两组中,最有效的踏频为 60 rpm。在两组中,增加踏频会降低 GE,增加 HR 和 V̇O
本研究是首次对 BM 进行性能和效率研究。在等效功率输出下,BM 的 GE 优于 NBM。这些结果与之前在自行车运动员中描述的分析一致,这可以用更好的有氧能力和训练状态来解释。等速膝关节最大力量和疲劳性与 GE 无关,因此不适合评估自行车运动中的 GE。