Oper Dent. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):476-487. doi: 10.2341/18-049-C. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
This study aimed to evaluate the bonding performance of a universal adhesive used according to self-etching or etch-and-rinse protocols in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and to compare the two protocols with their respective gold standard techniques.
This randomized, double-blind clinical study enrolled 34 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 29 of whom returned after two years. They received 152 restorations bonded with one of the three adhesives (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, Adper Single Bond 2, or Clearfil SE Bond) and one of the two bonding techniques tested. The NCCLs were restored with nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme). Final contours were done with a fine diamond rotary instrument and polished with rubber points. The restorations were evaluated using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria at baseline (seven days after the restoration procedure), 6, 12, and 24 months. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman analysis of variance, and least significant difference tests were performed.
No statistically significant differences were found in esthetics or the functional and biological evaluated criteria among the adhesive systems and techniques.
The Scotchbond Universal system behaved similarly to the conventional etch-and-rinse or self-etching systems in all the adhesion strategies in the evaluated periods.
本研究旨在评估通用型粘结剂在非龋性颈领缺损(NCCLs)中分别采用自酸蚀或酸蚀-冲洗两种预处理方法的粘结性能,并与各自的金标准技术进行比较。
本随机、双盲的临床研究纳入了符合纳入标准的 34 名参与者,其中 29 名在两年后返回。他们接受了三种粘结剂( Scotchbond UniversalAdhesive、AdperSingleBond2 或 ClearfilSEBond )之一和两种测试粘结技术之一的 152 个修复体粘结。采用纳米复合树脂(FiltekSupreme)修复 NCCLs。最终轮廓用精细金刚石旋转器械修整并用橡胶点抛光。修复体在基线(修复后 7 天)、6、12 和 24 个月时使用 FDI 世界牙科联合会标准进行评估。采用描述性统计、Kruskal-Wallis、Friedman 方差分析和最小显著差异检验进行分析。
在粘结剂系统和技术之间,在美学、功能和生物学评估标准方面均未发现统计学差异。
在评估期间, ScotchbondUniversal 系统在所有粘结策略中的表现与传统的酸蚀-冲洗或自酸蚀系统相似。