Suppr超能文献

早期儿童驱虫对读写和计算能力的长期影响:来自乌干达的证据。

The long run impact of early childhood deworming on numeracy and literacy: Evidence from Uganda.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 31;13(1):e0007085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007085. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 1.45 billion people currently suffer from soil transmitted helminth infection, with the largest burden occurring in Africa and Asia. Safe and cost effective deworming treatment exists, but there is a debate about mass distribution of this treatment in high prevalence settings. While the World Health Organization recommends mass administration of anthelmintic drugs for preschool and school-aged children in high (>20%) prevalence settings, and several long run follow up studies of an influential trial have suggested large benefits that persist over time, recent systematic reviews have called this recommendation into question.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This paper analyzes the long-term impact of a cluster-randomized trial in eastern Uganda that provided mass deworming treatment to preschool aged children from 2000 to 2003 on the numeracy and literacy skills of children and young adults living in those villages in 2010-2015. This study uses numeracy and literacy data collected seven to twelve years after the end of the deworming trial in a randomly selected subset of communities from the original trial, by an education-focused survey that had no relationship to the deworming study. Building on an earlier working paper which used data from 2010 and 2011 survey rounds, this paper uses an additional four years of numeracy and literacy data (2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015). Aggregating data from all survey rounds, the difference between numeracy scores in treatment versus control communities is 0.07 standard deviations (SD) (95% CI -0.10, 0.24, p = 0.40), the difference in literacy scores is 0.05 SD (95% CI -0.16, 0.27, p = 0.62), and the difference in total scores is 0.07 SD (95% CI -0.11, 0.25, p = 0.44). There are significant differences in program impact by gender, with numeracy and literacy differentially positively affected for girls, and by age, with treatment effects larger for the primary school aged subsample. There are also significant treatment interactions for those living in households with more treatment-eligible children. There is no evidence of differential treatment effects on age at program eligibility or number of years of program eligibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Mass deworming of preschool aged children in high prevalence communities in Uganda resulted in no statistically significant gains in numeracy or literacy 7-12 years after program completion. Point estimates were positive but imprecise; the study lacked sufficient power to rule out substantial positive effects or more modest negative effects. However, there is suggestive evidence that deworming was relatively more beneficial for girls, primary school aged children, and children living in households with other treated children.

RESEARCH APPROVAL

As this analysis was conducted on secondary data which is publicly available, no research approval was sought or received. All individual records were anonymized by the data provider prior to public release.

摘要

背景

目前有 14.5 亿人患有土壤传播性蠕虫感染,最大的负担发生在非洲和亚洲。安全且具有成本效益的驱虫治疗方法是存在的,但在高流行地区大规模分发这种治疗方法存在争议。虽然世界卫生组织建议在高(> 20%)流行地区为学龄前和学龄儿童大规模服用驱虫药物,但一项有影响力的试验的几项长期随访研究表明,这种治疗方法具有持续的长期益处,但最近的系统评价对这一建议提出了质疑。

方法和发现

本文分析了 2000 年至 2003 年在乌干达东部进行的一项整群随机试验的长期影响,该试验为学龄前儿童提供大规模驱虫治疗,以评估该试验对生活在这些村庄的儿童和年轻人的算术和读写能力的影响。这项研究使用了在驱虫试验结束后 7 到 12 年从原始试验中随机选择的社区收集的算术和读写能力数据,这些数据来自一个与驱虫研究无关的以教育为重点的调查。在一篇较早的工作论文中,该论文使用了 2010 年和 2011 年调查轮次的数据,本论文使用了另外四年的算术和读写能力数据(2012 年、2013 年、2014 年和 2015 年)。汇总所有调查轮次的数据,治疗社区与对照社区之间的算术分数差异为 0.07 个标准差(SD)(95%CI-0.10,0.24,p=0.40),读写分数差异为 0.05 SD(95%CI-0.16,0.27,p=0.62),总分差异为 0.07 SD(95%CI-0.11,0.25,p=0.44)。在性别方面,该计划的影响存在显著差异,女孩的算术和读写能力得到了不同程度的积极影响,而在年龄方面,小学年龄段的样本受到的影响更大。对于居住在有更多符合治疗条件的儿童的家庭中的儿童,也存在显著的治疗相互作用。没有证据表明驱虫治疗对计划资格年龄或计划资格年限有差异。

结论

在乌干达高流行地区对学龄前儿童进行大规模驱虫治疗,在项目完成后 7-12 年内,在计算能力或读写能力方面没有统计学上的显著提高。点估计值为正,但不精确;该研究缺乏足够的能力排除实质性的积极影响或更适度的负面影响。然而,有迹象表明,驱虫治疗对女孩、小学年龄儿童和与其他接受治疗儿童一起生活的儿童相对更有益。

研究批准

由于这是对公开可用的二次数据进行的分析,因此未寻求或获得研究批准。在数据提供者公开发布之前,所有个人记录都被匿名化了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1cc/6377149/5ca4503c1459/pntd.0007085.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验