Forensic Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Chemistry, Environment and Feed Hygiene, The National Veterinary Institute, SE-751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Jan;135(1):253-267. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02467-x. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
The objective of this study was to determine if a novel scoring-based model for histological quantification of decomposed human livers could improve the precision of post-mortem interval (PMI) estimation for bodies from an indoor setting. The hepatic decomposition score (HDS) system created consists of five liver scores (HDS markers): cell nuclei and cell structure of hepatocytes, bile ducts, portal triad, and architecture. A total of 236 forensic autopsy cases were divided into a training dataset (n = 158) and a validation dataset (n = 78). All cases were also scored using the total body score (TBS) method. We specified a stochastic relationship between the log-transformed accumulated degree-days (logADD) and the taphonomic findings, using a multivariate regression model to compute the likelihood function. Three models were applied, based on (i) five HDS markers, (ii) three partial body scores (head, trunk, limbs), or (iii) a combination of the two. The predicted logADD was compared with the true logADD for each case. The fitted models performed equally well in the training dataset and the validation dataset. The model comprising both scoring methods had somewhat better precision than either method separately. Our results indicated that the HDS system was statistically robust. Combining the HDS markers with the partial body scores resulted in a better representation of the decomposition process and might improve PMI estimation of decomposed human remains.
本研究旨在确定一种基于评分的新型方法是否可以提高室内环境下人体肝脏死后分解程度的推断精度,该方法可以对人体肝脏进行组织学量化。创建的肝脏分解评分(HDS)系统由五个肝脏评分(HDS 标志物)组成:肝细胞的细胞核和细胞结构、胆管、门三联体和结构。共纳入 236 例法医解剖案例,分为训练数据集(n = 158)和验证数据集(n = 78)。所有病例均采用全身评分(TBS)方法进行评分。我们指定了对数累积度日(logADD)和尸骸埋藏学发现之间的随机关系,使用多元回归模型计算似然函数。基于以下三种模型应用:(i)五个 HDS 标志物,(ii)三个局部尸骸评分(头、躯干、四肢),或(iii)两者的组合。将预测的 logADD 与每个病例的真实 logADD 进行比较。拟合模型在训练数据集和验证数据集的表现相当。包含两种评分方法的模型比单独使用任何一种方法的精度都要高一些。我们的研究结果表明 HDS 系统具有统计学稳健性。将 HDS 标志物与局部尸骸评分相结合,可以更好地代表分解过程,从而可能提高对人体分解残骸的 PMI 推断。