Suppr超能文献

中国上海1990 - 2015年致命医疗事故案例中的诊断错误

Diagnostic errors in fatal medical malpractice cases in Shanghai, China: 1990-2015.

作者信息

Gao Pan, Li Xiaoqiang, Zhao Ziqin, Zhang Nong, Ma Kaijun, Li Liliang

机构信息

Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0785-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical disputes remain unabated in China. Previous studies have shown the changes of diagnostic discrepancy over time in developed countries, but diagnostic discrepancy remains understudied in China, especially in the setting of medical disputes. We sought to describe the year-based changes of diagnostic discrepancies in medical disputes, and to identify factors associated with classes of diagnostic discrepancy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all medically disputed cases from 1990 through 2015 in Shanghai, China, with use of necropsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. Cases were grouped based on national legislative eras. Diagnostic discrepancy was classified as major errors (class I and II), minor errors (class III and IV), no discrepancy (class V) and undetermined (class VI) based on discrepancy severity.

RESULTS

There were 482 medical disputes. Cases were predominantly males (male: female = 1.6:1) and concentrated in patients less than 10 years old or between 50 and 70 years. Major and minor discrepancy accounted for 51.7 and 34.8%, respectively. Fifty-five cases (11.2%) were non-discrepant (Class V). The dispute rate remained high before the first round of legislation (mean 0.31 per 1 million patients) but declined dramatically afterwards (R = - 0.82, p < 0.001 for time trends). Over the national legislative eras, the annual number of cases with diagnostic errors declined steadily. Incidence rates of discrepancy decreased significantly for class I (R = - 0.73, p = 0.024), II (R = - 0.48, p = 0.013), III (R = - 0.69, p < 0.0001), IV (R = - 0.69, p < 0.0001) and V discrepancy (R = - 0.58, p = 0.0018). Diseases from the respiratory system had significantly lower risks of any diagnostic errors (OR = 0.48, 95% 0.24-0.95, p = 0.036). A neoplasm carrier increased by 92% the risk of any diagnostic error (OR = 1.92; 95%CI 1.18-3.14; p = 0.009) and hypertension reduced by 78% the risk of minor errors (OR = 0.22, 95%CI 0.06-0.91, p = 0.036). Severity of discrepancy relieved over years and associated with ageing in patients with cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of fatal medical disputes and diagnostic discrepancy declined after stepwise legislations in China. Respiratory diseases, neoplasm carrier and hypertension could be independent predictors for assessing diagnostic errors.

摘要

背景

中国的医疗纠纷持续不断。以往研究显示了发达国家诊断差异随时间的变化情况,但在中国,尤其是在医疗纠纷背景下,诊断差异仍未得到充分研究。我们试图描述医疗纠纷中诊断差异随年份的变化情况,并确定与诊断差异类别相关的因素。

方法

我们对1990年至2015年中国上海所有医疗纠纷案例进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以尸检作为诊断的金标准。根据国家立法时期对案例进行分组。根据差异严重程度,诊断差异分为重大错误(I类和II类)、轻微错误(III类和IV类)、无差异(V类)和不确定(VI类)。

结果

共有482起医疗纠纷。案例主要为男性(男:女 = 1.6:1),集中在10岁以下或50至70岁的患者中。重大差异和轻微差异分别占51.7%和34.8%。55例(11.2%)无差异(V类)。在第一轮立法之前,纠纷率一直很高(平均每百万患者0.31例),但之后急剧下降(时间趋势R = -0.82,p < 0.001)。在国家立法时期,诊断错误的年度案例数量稳步下降。I类(R = -0.73,p = 0.024)、II类(R = -0.48,p = 0.013)、III类(R = -0.69,p < 0.0001)、IV类(R = -0.69,p < 0.0001)和V类差异(R = -0.58,p = 0.0018)的差异发生率显著下降。呼吸系统疾病发生任何诊断错误的风险显著较低(OR = 0.48,95% 0.24 - 0.95,p = 0.036)。肿瘤携带者发生任何诊断错误的风险增加了92%(OR = 1.92;95%CI 1.18 - 3.14;p = 0.009),高血压使轻微错误的风险降低了78%(OR = 0.22,95%CI 0.06 - 0.91,p = 0.036)。差异的严重程度多年来有所缓解,并且与心血管疾病患者的年龄增长有关(p = 0.01)。

结论

在中国逐步立法后,致命医疗纠纷和诊断差异的发生率下降。呼吸系统疾病、肿瘤携带者和高血压可能是评估诊断错误的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05e/6357365/cb8c1161c553/13000_2019_785_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验