• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三个医学时代的诊断错误:一项尸检研究

Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study.

作者信息

Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F

机构信息

Medical Clinic B, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2027-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02349-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02349-7
PMID:10885353
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in unselected patients who died in hospital in different medical eras have shown no decline of errors in the main diagnosis. We assessed changes in diagnostic accuracy over 20 years.

METHODS

We analysed retrospectively diagnostic errors, with use of necropsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. We randomly selected 300 patients who died at a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Switzerland--100 in each of 1972, 1982, and 1992. We classified discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings as major and minor errors.

FINDINGS

The overall necropsy rate at the hospital stayed at around 90% for the whole period. During the study, the frequency of major discrepancies declined significantly (1972, 30%; 1982, 18%; 1992, 14%; p=0.007). The rate of minor diagnostic errors increased significantly from 23% in 1972 to 46% in 1992 (p<0.001). The increase in overall diagnostic accuracy occurred mainly because of a significant improvement in specificity for cardiovascular diseases (1972, 85%; 1982, 82%; 1992, 97%; p=0.034) and non-significantly improved sensitivity (1972, 69%; 1982, 82%; 1992, 86%; p=0.061). Sensitivity also improved for infectious diseases (1972, 25%; 1982, 67%; 1992, 86%; p=0.036). Sensitivity and specificity for neoplastic diseases were high originally and did not change. The total number of diagnostic procedures per year increased from 191 in 1972 to 259 in 1992, mainly because of non-invasive techniques, such as ultrasonography, and endoscopies.

INTERPRETATION

The frequency of major diagnostic errors in unselected patients who died in hospital was halved over 20 years, probably because of improved clinical skills and new diagnostic procedures.

摘要

背景

对不同医学时代在医院死亡的未经挑选的患者的临床诊断准确性进行比较的研究表明,主要诊断中的错误并未减少。我们评估了20年间诊断准确性的变化。

方法

我们以尸检作为诊断的金标准,对诊断错误进行回顾性分析。我们随机选择了瑞士一家三级护理教学医院的300名死亡患者——1972年、1982年和1992年各100名。我们将临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异分为重大错误和微小错误。

结果

该医院的总体尸检率在整个期间保持在90%左右。在研究期间,重大差异的频率显著下降(1972年为30%;1982年为18%;1992年为14%;p=0.007)。微小诊断错误的发生率从1972年的23%显著增加到1992年的46%(p<0.001)。总体诊断准确性的提高主要是因为心血管疾病的特异性有显著改善(1972年为85%;1982年为82%;1992年为97%;p=0.034),敏感性虽有提高但不显著(1972年为69%;1982年为82%;1992年为86%;p=0.061)。传染病的敏感性也有所提高(1972年为25%;1982年为67%;1992年为86%;p=0.036)。肿瘤疾病的敏感性和特异性最初较高,没有变化。每年诊断程序的总数从1972年的191次增加到1992年的259次,主要是因为超声检查和内镜检查等非侵入性技术。

解读

在医院死亡的未经挑选的患者中,重大诊断错误的频率在20年内减半,可能是因为临床技能的提高和新的诊断程序。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study.三个医学时代的诊断错误:一项尸检研究
Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2027-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02349-7.
2
Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study.新世纪的诊断错误:一项后续尸检研究。
Mod Pathol. 2012 Jun;25(6):777-83. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.199. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
3
Diagnostic performance in a primary referral hospital assessed by autopsy: evolution over a ten-year period.在一家主要转诊医院进行的尸检评估的诊断性能:十年间的演变。
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Dec;20(8):784-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
4
Diagnostic errors in fatal medical malpractice cases in Shanghai, China: 1990-2015.中国上海1990 - 2015年致命医疗事故案例中的诊断错误
Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0785-5.
5
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一所综合大学医院中的临床病理差异。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.
6
Clinical and pathological discrepancies and cardiovascular findings in 409 consecutive autopsies.409 例连续尸检的临床和病理差异及心血管发现。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Dec;97(6):449-55. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000111. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients*.临床诊断和尸检结果:危重症患者中的差异*。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):842-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f64f.
8
[Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].[医院诊断质量的文件记录:尸检报告评估]
Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32 Suppl 2:282-6. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1521-4.
9
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnosis of causes of death in adults in Mozambique: A retrospective observational study.莫桑比克成年人死因诊断的临床病理差异:一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0220657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220657. eCollection 2019.
10
Quality of care and maternal mortality in a tertiary-level hospital in Mozambique: a retrospective study of clinicopathological discrepancies.莫桑比克一家三级医院的护理质量与产妇死亡率:临床病理差异的回顾性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e965-e972. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30236-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Attachment as a Primary Mechanism in Physician Cognition and Bias During Complex Medical Cases: A Narrative Review.复杂医疗案例中医师认知与偏见的主要机制——依恋:一项叙述性综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 May 1;16:713-728. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S496784. eCollection 2025.
2
An audit of autopsy-confirmed diagnostic errors in perinatal deaths: What are the most common major missed diagnoses.围产期死亡经尸检确诊的诊断错误审计:最常见的主要漏诊情况有哪些。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19984. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19984. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Self-learning of cardiac ultrasound by medical students: can augmented online training improve and maintain manual POCUS skills over time?
医学生的心脏超声自学:增强型在线培训能否随着时间的推移提高和保持手动 POUS 技能?
J Ultrasound. 2024 Mar;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00804-5. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Diagnostic error in the pediatric hospital: a narrative review.儿科医院的诊断错误:叙事性综述。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):437-444. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.2004040. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and hospital autopsy: A comparative retrospective analysis of 1,112 cases.临床诊断与医院尸检的差异:1112 例对比回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0255490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255490. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Diagnostic Recommendations from Individual Physicians versus the Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians in Ambulatory Cases Referred for Specialist Consultation.在门诊转介给专家会诊的病例中,比较单个医生的诊断建议与多位医生的集体智慧。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):293-302. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211031209. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Autopsy and pre-mortem diagnostic discrepancy review in an Irish tertiary PICU.爱尔兰三级 PICU 中的尸检和生前诊断差异回顾。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;180(12):3519-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04155-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Frequency and Significance of Pathologic Pulmonary Findings in Postmortem Examinations-A Single Center Experience before COVID-19.尸检中病理性肺部发现的频率及意义——COVID-19 之前的单中心经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 18;11(5):894. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050894.
9
Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者生前临床诊断与死后发现的比较。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Aug;479(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
10
Quality of care and maternal mortality in a tertiary-level hospital in Mozambique: a retrospective study of clinicopathological discrepancies.莫桑比克一家三级医院的护理质量与产妇死亡率:临床病理差异的回顾性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e965-e972. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30236-9.