Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.
Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
In recent years, psychiatry research has increasingly focused on understanding mental illnesses from a cross-diagnostic, dimensional perspective in order to better align their neurocognitive features with underlying neurobiological mechanisms. In this multi-site study, we examined two measures of cognitive control (d-prime context and lapsing rate) during the Dot Probe Expectancy (DPX) version of the AX-Continuous Performance Task in patients with either schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective disorder (SZ-A), or Type I bipolar disorder (BD) as well as healthy control (HC) subjects. We hypothesized significantly lower d-prime context and higher lapsing rate in SZ and SZ-A patients and intermediate levels in BD patients relative to HC.
72 HC, 84 SZ, 77 SZ-A, and 58 BD patients (ages 18-56) were included in the final study sample.
Significant main effects of diagnosis were observed on d-prime context (F(3,279) = 9.59, p < 0.001) and lapsing (F(3,279) = 8.08, p < 0.001). A priori linear contrasts suggesting intermediate dysfunction in BD patients were significant (p < 0.001), although post-hoc tests showed the BD group was only significantly different from HC on d-prime context. Group results for d-prime context remained significant after covarying for lapsing rate. Primary behavioral measures were associated with mania and disorganization symptoms as well as everyday functioning.
These findings suggest a continuum of dysfunction in cognitive control (particularly d-prime context) across diagnostic categories in psychiatric illness. These results further suggest that lapsing and d-prime context, while related, make unique contributions towards explaining deficits in cognitive control in these disorders.
近年来,精神病学研究越来越关注从跨诊断、维度的角度理解精神疾病,以便更好地将其神经认知特征与潜在的神经生物学机制相匹配。在这项多中心研究中,我们在 AX-连续绩效任务的 DPX 版本中检查了两种认知控制测量指标(d-prime 语境和失误率),这些测量指标在精神分裂症(SZ)、分裂情感障碍(SZ-A)或 I 型双相情感障碍(BD)患者以及健康对照(HC)受试者中进行。我们假设 SZ 和 SZ-A 患者的 d-prime 语境显著降低,失误率显著升高,BD 患者的水平居中。
最终研究样本包括 72 名 HC、84 名 SZ、77 名 SZ-A 和 58 名 BD 患者(年龄 18-56 岁)。
诊断的显著主效应在 d-prime 语境(F(3,279) = 9.59, p < 0.001)和失误率(F(3,279) = 8.08, p < 0.001)上观察到。先验线性对比表明,BD 患者的功能障碍处于中间水平(p < 0.001),尽管事后检验显示 BD 组仅在 d-prime 语境上与 HC 显著不同。在协方差滞后率后,d-prime 语境的组结果仍然显著。主要行为测量与躁狂和混乱症状以及日常功能有关。
这些发现表明,在精神疾病的诊断类别中,认知控制(特别是 d-prime 语境)存在连续功能障碍。这些结果进一步表明,失误率和 d-prime 语境虽然相关,但对解释这些疾病中认知控制缺陷有独特的贡献。