• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌质子放疗与光子放疗所致4级淋巴细胞减少的比较

A Comparison of Grade 4 Lymphopenia With Proton Versus Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Routman David M, Garant Aurelie, Lester Scott C, Day Courtney N, Harmsen William S, Sanheuza Cristobal T, Yoon Harry H, Neben-Wittich Michelle A, Martenson James A, Haddock Michael G, Hallemeier Christopher L, Merrell Kenneth W

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 17;4(1):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.004. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.004
PMID:30706012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6349594/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Grade 4 lymphopenia (G4L) during radiation therapy (RT) is associated with higher rates of distant metastasis and decreased overall survival in a number of malignancies, including esophageal cancer (EC). Through a reduction in integral radiation dose, proton RT (PRT) may reduce G4L relative to photon RT (XRT). The purpose of this study was to compare G4L in patients with EC undergoing PRT versus XRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients receiving curative-intent RT and concurrent chemotherapy for EC were identified. Lymphocyte nadir was defined as the lowest lymphocyte count during RT. G4L was defined as absolute lymphocyte count <200/mm. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) were performed to assess patient and treatment factors associated with lymphopenia. A propensity-matched (PM) cohort was created using logistic regression, including baseline covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 years (range, 32-85 years). Of these patients, 79 received XRT (27% 3-dimensional chemo-RT and 73% intensity modulated RT) and 65 received PRT (100% pencil-beam scanning). Chemotherapy consisted of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (99%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, except for age (median 4 years older in the PRT cohort). G4L was significantly higher in patients who received XRT versus those who received PRT (56% vs 22%; < .01). On MVA, XRT (odds ratio [OR]: 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-11.18; < .001) and stage III/IV (OR: 4.54; 95% CI, 1.87-11.00; < .001) were associated with G4L. PM resulted in 50 PRT and 50 XRT patients. In the PM cohort, G4L occurred in 60% of patients who received XRT versus 24% of patients who received PRT. On MVA, XRT (OR: 5.28; 95% CI, 2.14-12.99; < .001) and stage III/IV (OR: 3.77; 95% CI, 1.26-11.30; = .02) were associated with G4L.

CONCLUSIONS

XRT was associated with a significantly higher risk of G4L in comparison with PRT. Further work is needed to evaluate a potential association between RT modality and antitumor immunity as well as long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

在包括食管癌(EC)在内的多种恶性肿瘤中,放射治疗(RT)期间的4级淋巴细胞减少(G4L)与远处转移率升高及总生存率降低相关。通过降低总辐射剂量,质子放疗(PRT)相对于光子放疗(XRT)可能会减少G4L。本研究的目的是比较接受PRT与XRT的EC患者的G4L情况。

方法和材料

确定接受EC根治性放疗及同步化疗的患者。淋巴细胞最低点定义为放疗期间的最低淋巴细胞计数。G4L定义为绝对淋巴细胞计数<200/mm³。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析(MVA)以评估与淋巴细胞减少相关的患者和治疗因素。使用逻辑回归创建倾向匹配(PM)队列,包括基线协变量。

结果

共有144例患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为66岁(范围32 - 85岁)。这些患者中,79例接受XRT(27%为三维化疗放疗,73%为调强放疗),65例接受PRT(100%为笔形束扫描)。化疗方案为每周使用卡铂和紫杉醇(99%)。除年龄外(PRT队列中位年龄大4岁),两组间基线特征无显著差异。接受XRT患者的G4L显著高于接受PRT的患者(56%对22%;P <.01)。在MVA中,XRT(比值比[OR]:5.13;95%置信区间[CI],2.35 - 11.18;P <.001)和III/IV期(OR:4.54;CI,1.87 - 11.00;P <.001)与G4L相关。PM后有50例PRT患者和50例XRT患者。在PM队列中,接受XRT患者的G4L发生率为60%,而接受PRT患者为24%。在MVA中,XRT(OR:5.28;95%CI,2.14 - 12.99;P <.001)和III/IV期(OR:3.77;95%CI,1.26 - 11.30;P =.02)与G4L相关。

结论

与PRT相比,XRT与G4L的风险显著更高相关。需要进一步研究以评估放疗方式与抗肿瘤免疫以及长期预后之间的潜在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/fc585c9d7bd8/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/038470b5d62d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/67b32fc32187/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/fc585c9d7bd8/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/038470b5d62d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/67b32fc32187/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e056/6349594/fc585c9d7bd8/figs2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Grade 4 Lymphopenia With Proton Versus Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌质子放疗与光子放疗所致4级淋巴细胞减少的比较
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 17;4(1):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.004. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
2
Severe Lymphopenia During Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Comprehensive Analysis of Randomized Phase 2B Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.食管癌放化疗期间严重淋巴细胞减少症:质子束放疗与调强放疗随机 2B 期试验的综合分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Feb 1;118(2):368-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.058. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life During Proton Versus Photon Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.质子与光子放化疗治疗食管癌患者报告的健康相关生活质量比较。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
4
Post-treatment neuroendocrine outcomes among pediatric brain tumor patients: Is there a difference between proton and photon therapy?小儿脑肿瘤患者治疗后的神经内分泌结局:质子治疗和光子治疗之间有差异吗?
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 25;34:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.02.010. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Long-term cognitive and academic outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy.质子放疗与光子放疗治疗儿童脑肿瘤后患者的长期认知和学业结局。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Sep;68(9):e29125. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29125. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Cancers.针对患有脑癌、头颈癌的孕妇的笔形束扫描质子治疗
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Mar 1;118(3):853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.040. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Unique brain injury patterns after proton vs photon radiotherapy for WHO grade 2-3 gliomas.对于世界卫生组织2-3级神经胶质瘤,质子放疗与光子放疗后的独特脑损伤模式。
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 6;29(12):e1748-e1761. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae195.
8
Superior Intellectual Outcomes After Proton Radiotherapy Compared With Photon Radiotherapy for Pediatric Medulloblastoma.质子放疗对比光子放疗在儿童髓母细胞瘤中的优越智力预后。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):454-461. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01706. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
9
Brain volume loss after cranial irradiation: a controlled comparison study between photon vs proton radiotherapy for WHO grade 2-3 gliomas.颅脑照射后的脑容量损失:WHO 2-3级胶质瘤光子放疗与质子放疗的对照比较研究
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jan;171(2):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04850-9. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
10
Hypothyroidism after craniospinal irradiation with proton or photon therapy in patients with medulloblastoma.髓母细胞瘤患者接受质子或光子治疗的颅脊髓照射后发生甲状腺功能减退症。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 May;35(4):257-267. doi: 10.1080/08880018.2018.1471111. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer compared to existing treatments, including X-ray therapy and surgery.与包括X射线疗法和手术在内的现有治疗方法相比,质子束疗法用于治疗食管癌。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106767. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106767.
2
Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Prognosis and Risk Factors in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Patients.乳房切除术后放疗患者放射性淋巴细胞减少症的预后及危险因素
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 May 28;17:1047-1058. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S522807. eCollection 2025.
3
Application of radiomics in lung immuno-oncology.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationships between lymphocyte counts and treatment-related toxicities and clinical responses in patients with solid tumors treated with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors.接受PD-1检查点抑制剂治疗的实体瘤患者中淋巴细胞计数与治疗相关毒性及临床反应之间的关系。
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 14;8(69):114268-114280. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23217. eCollection 2017 Dec 26.
2
Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy.食管癌新辅助放化疗期间严重淋巴细胞减少症:质子与光子放疗相对风险的倾向评分匹配分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jul;128(1):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
放射组学在肺部免疫肿瘤学中的应用。
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023 Apr 4;7(2):128-136. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1191. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial - a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer.PROTECT试验中的放射治疗质量保证——一项欧洲随机III期试验,比较质子治疗和光子治疗在食管癌患者治疗中的效果。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 13;64:406-414. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42774.
5
Normal tissue complication probability model for severe radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.同步放化疗治疗胰腺癌患者严重放射性淋巴细胞减少的正常组织并发症概率模型
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Dec 22;33:100690. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100690. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Treatment-Related Side Effects and Toxicities.质子放射治疗:治疗相关副作用和毒性的系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 11;25(20):10969. doi: 10.3390/ijms252010969.
7
Outcomes of definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性碳离子放疗治疗 cT1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌的结果。
Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):523-529. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01067-7. Epub 2024 May 30.
8
Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: external validation of two prediction models.III期非小细胞肺癌同步放化疗期间严重放射性淋巴细胞减少:两种预测模型的外部验证
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 9;13:1278723. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1278723. eCollection 2023.
9
Cardiac Dose Predicts the Response to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.心脏剂量可预测食管鳞状细胞癌同步放化疗的反应。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;15(18):4580. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184580.
10
A review on lymphocyte radiosensitivity and its impact on radiotherapy.淋巴细胞放射敏感性及其对放射治疗影响的综述。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 3;13:1201500. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1201500. eCollection 2023.
Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma.
纳武利尤单抗辅助治疗与伊匹单抗用于切除的 III 期或 IV 期黑色素瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709030. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
4
Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Durvalumab 用于 III 期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1919-1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome.用于癌症免疫治疗的PD-1和PD-L1检查点信号抑制:机制、联合应用及临床结果
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 23;8:561. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00561. eCollection 2017.
6
Lymphocyte Nadir and Esophageal Cancer Survival Outcomes After Chemoradiation Therapy.放化疗后淋巴细胞最低点与食管癌生存结局
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Vaccination after Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiation and Surgery in a Mesothelioma Mouse Model.加速分割放疗和手术治疗后在间皮瘤小鼠模型中的疫苗接种。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5502-5513. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0438. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
The intersection of radiotherapy and immunotherapy: mechanisms and clinical implications.放射治疗与免疫治疗的交叉:机制与临床意义。
Sci Immunol. 2016 Sep;1(3). doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag1266. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.纳武利尤单抗用于复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1856-1867. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
10
Prolonged Survival in Stage III Melanoma with Ipilimumab Adjuvant Therapy.伊匹单抗辅助治疗Ⅲ期黑色素瘤的长期生存
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1845-1855. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611299. Epub 2016 Oct 7.