• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期与晚期行外倒转术的成功率比较。

Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version.

机构信息

Lis Maternity and Women's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):116-121. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12774. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12774
PMID:30706464
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine optimum timing of external cephalic version (ECV).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Israel between February 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017. Healthy primiparous women with breech presentation were offered either early ECV (35-36 weeks; n=54) or late ECV (37-38 weeks; n=106). Group assignment was according to the patient's preference and physician availability. The primary outcome was the rate of cephalic presentation at delivery. Secondary outcomes included rate of cesarean delivery, presentation of fetus after the first and last ECVs, and serious fetal complications.

RESULTS

The incidence of undergoing more than two ECV attempts was 18.5% in the early ECV group and 5.6% in the late ECV group (P=0.039). The incidence of cephalic presentation after the first ECV was 72.2% in the early ECV group versus 66.0% in the late ECV group (P=0.048). By contrast, no statistically significant between-group differences were found for presentation at delivery or rate of cesarean delivery. The other outcomes were also similar.

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of ECV among primiparous women increased the chance of immediate cephalic presentation; however, it had no effect on presentation at delivery or cesarean delivery rate.

摘要

目的

确定外倒转术(ECV)的最佳时机。

方法

本研究为 2016 年 2 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 1 日在以色列一家三级医院进行的回顾性队列研究。对臀位的健康初产妇分别进行早期 ECV(35-36 周;n=54)或晚期 ECV(37-38 周;n=106)。分组依据是患者的意愿和医生的时间安排。主要结局是分娩时头位的比例。次要结局包括剖宫产率、第一次和最后一次 ECV 后胎儿的位置,以及严重的胎儿并发症。

结果

早期 ECV 组中有 18.5%的患者需要进行两次以上的 ECV 尝试,而晚期 ECV 组中这一比例为 5.6%(P=0.039)。早期 ECV 组中第一次 ECV 后头位的发生率为 72.2%,而晚期 ECV 组为 66.0%(P=0.048)。相比之下,两组在分娩时的头位率或剖宫产率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。其他结局也相似。

结论

初产妇早期进行 ECV 可增加即刻头位的机会,但对分娩时的头位率或剖宫产率没有影响。

相似文献

1
Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version.早期与晚期行外倒转术的成功率比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):116-121. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12774. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Clinical outcomes after external cephalic version with spinal anesthesia after failure of a first attempt without anesthesia.第一尝试椎管内麻醉失败后行外转胎位术的临床结局。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):324-328. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12312. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.首次剖宫产臀位分娩后再次妊娠的分娩结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(9):1554-1560. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1523388. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
4
An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.一项观察性研究,调查了 2546 例由经过培训的助产士对低危孕妇实施的外部头位倒转术的成功率和并发症。
BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):415-23. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13234. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
5
[Cord accident after external cephalic version: Reality or mostly myth?].[外倒转术后脐带意外:是事实还是大多为虚构?]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Jan;45(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].[臀位分娩:CNGOF临床实践指南 - 外倒转术及其他将臀位胎儿转为头位分娩的干预措施]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.臀位外倒转术成功后47例分娩与头先露自然分娩7456例的母儿结局比较。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):477-481. doi: 10.1159/000480013. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
[Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].[外倒转术对臀位阴道分娩成功率高的团队中产科预后的影响]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Oct;45(8):859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
9
Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?外倒转术时及之后的胎儿心率异常:哪些胎儿有风险,如何分娩?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1547-6.
10
Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史女性外倒转术的配对队列研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138(1):79-83. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12169. Epub 2017 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the Successful External Cephalic Version Prognostic Parameters Effect on Final Mode of Delivery.评估成功的外倒转术预后参数对最终分娩方式的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):e16637. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16637. eCollection 2021 Jul.