放射性粒子与不可触及乳腺病变的导丝定位：单中心回顾性研究。
Radioactive seed vs wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: A single institution review.
机构信息
Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
出版信息
Breast J. 2019 Mar;25(2):282-285. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13201. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
The aim of this study was to compare wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) for nonpalpable breast lesions with regard to margin status, re-excision rate, procedure length, and complications related to localization. A retrospective review of the electronic health records at a single institution was performed. There was no difference in re-excision rate, margin positivity, volume of tissue removed, and complication rate for RSL vs WL (P = 0.9934, P = 0.9934, P = 0.6645, and P = 0.4716 respectively). The only difference was a longer OR time, RSL = 104.408 minutes vs WL = 82.386 minutes. (P = 0.0163). RSL and WL are comparable techniques for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
本研究旨在比较不可触及性乳腺病变的导丝定位（WL）和放射性种子定位（RSL）在切缘状态、再次切除率、手术时间和与定位相关的并发症方面的差异。对单机构的电子病历进行了回顾性分析。RSL 与 WL 之间的再次切除率、切缘阳性率、切除组织量和并发症发生率无差异（P=0.9934，P=0.9934，P=0.6645，P=0.4716）。唯一的区别是手术时间较长，RSL=104.408 分钟，WL=82.386 分钟（P=0.0163）。RSL 和 WL 是定位不可触及性乳腺病变的两种可比较的技术。
Zotero 插件