• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫癌肉瘤的细胞学特征:一项对20例病例的回顾性研究,重点关注子宫内膜细胞学的实用性。

Cytological features of uterine carcinosarcoma: A retrospective study of 20 cases with an emphasis on the usefulness of endometrial cytology.

作者信息

Okano Kimiaki, Ishida Mitsuaki, Sandoh Kaori, Mizokami Tomomi, Kita Masato, Okada Hidetaka, Tsuta Koji

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Jun;47(6):547-552. doi: 10.1002/dc.24152. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1002/dc.24152
PMID:30706679
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carcinosarcoma of the endometrium is a relatively rare but aggressive neoplasm. Endometrial cytological features of this type of tumor have been rarely reported. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of endometrial cytological examination in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinosarcoma.

METHODS

Patients histopathologically diagnosed with endometrial carcinosarcoma who underwent preoperative endometrial or endocervical cytological examination were enrolled. The endometrial and/or endocervical specimens were conventionally stained with Papanicolaou stain, and the cytological characteristics, including arrangement and shape of the neoplastic cells, and the nuclear and cytoplasmic features were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled in the study. In the endometrial specimens, carcinomatous component was detected in almost all cases (94.4%), including those suspicious of carcinoma despite a small volume of carcinomatous cells. Sarcomatous component was observed in 6 of 18 cases (33.3%) and was significantly more frequently detected in the heterologous type (5 of 9 cases) compared to the homologous type (1 of 9 cases) (P = 0.046). In the endocervical specimens, carcinomatous component was present in 76.5% of cases, but sarcomatous component was detected in only 17.6% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Although endocervical cytology can detect the carcinomatous component in more than 50% of endometrial carcinosarcoma cases, it has lesser capability to detect sarcomatous component. In conclusion, endometrial cytological examination is a more useful and accurate method to detect sarcomatous component of endometrial carcinosarcoma, particularly in the heterologous type, compared to endocervical cytological examination.

摘要

背景

子宫内膜癌肉瘤是一种相对罕见但具有侵袭性的肿瘤。关于这类肿瘤的子宫内膜细胞学特征鲜有报道。本研究旨在阐明子宫内膜细胞学检查在子宫内膜癌肉瘤诊断中的作用。

方法

纳入术前接受过子宫内膜或宫颈细胞学检查且经组织病理学诊断为子宫内膜癌肉瘤的患者。子宫内膜和/或宫颈标本采用巴氏染色进行常规染色,并对肿瘤细胞的排列、形态以及细胞核和细胞质特征等细胞学特征进行回顾性分析。

结果

本研究共纳入20例患者。在子宫内膜标本中,几乎所有病例(94.4%)均检测到癌性成分,包括那些虽癌细胞数量少但可疑为癌的病例。18例中有6例(33.3%)观察到肉瘤成分,与同源型(9例中的1例)相比,异源型(9例中的5例)中肉瘤成分的检出频率显著更高(P = 0.046)。在宫颈标本中,76.5%的病例存在癌性成分,但仅17.6%的病例检测到肉瘤成分。

结论

尽管宫颈细胞学检查能在超过50%的子宫内膜癌肉瘤病例中检测到癌性成分,但检测肉瘤成分的能力较弱。总之,与宫颈细胞学检查相比,子宫内膜细胞学检查是检测子宫内膜癌肉瘤肉瘤成分,尤其是异源型肉瘤成分更有用且准确的方法。

相似文献

1
Cytological features of uterine carcinosarcoma: A retrospective study of 20 cases with an emphasis on the usefulness of endometrial cytology.子宫癌肉瘤的细胞学特征:一项对20例病例的回顾性研究,重点关注子宫内膜细胞学的实用性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Jun;47(6):547-552. doi: 10.1002/dc.24152. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Cytology of vaginal and uterine sarcomas.阴道和子宫肉瘤的细胞学
Acta Cytol. 2004 Sep-Oct;48(5):601-7. doi: 10.1159/000326429.
3
CD34 immunohistochemistry in female genital tract carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed müllerian tumors) supports a dominant role of the carcinomatous component.女性生殖道癌肉瘤(恶性混合性苗勒管肿瘤)中的CD34免疫组化显示癌成分起主要作用。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000 Dec;8(4):293-9.
4
Uterine carcinosarcoma and high-risk endometrial carcinomas: a clinicopathological comparison.子宫癌肉瘤与高危子宫内膜癌:临床病理比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):629-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000350.
5
[Carcinosarcoma of the endometrium with melanocytic differentiation, case report].[伴有黑素细胞分化的子宫内膜癌肉瘤,病例报告]
Ceska Gynekol. 2017 Fall;82(5):390-395.
6
Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in directly sampled endometrial cytology: A monocentric retrospective study of six cases.直接采样子宫内膜细胞学中的小细胞神经内分泌癌:一项6例病例的单中心回顾性研究
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Dec;47(12):1297-1301. doi: 10.1002/dc.24298. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
7
Comparison between adenocarcinoma in both endocervical and endometrial specimens from fractional curettage and pathologic findings in subsequent hysterectomy specimens.分段刮宫获取的宫颈管内膜和子宫内膜标本中的腺癌与后续子宫切除标本病理结果的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Sep;91(9):1313-7.
8
CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma.子宫颈管腺性病变、子宫颈管间质及子宫内膜样腺癌的CD10和钙视网膜蛋白染色:CD10阳性是中肾病变的特征,但不具有特异性,且对子宫内膜间质也不具有特异性。
Histopathology. 2003 Aug;43(2):144-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01684.x.
9
Differential expression of matrix metalloprotease-7 in each component of uterine carcinosarcoma.基质金属蛋白酶-7在子宫癌肉瘤各成分中的差异表达。
Oncol Rep. 2000 Nov-Dec;7(6):1209-12. doi: 10.3892/or.7.6.1209.
10
p53 protein detection by the western blotting technique in normal and neoplastic specimens of human endometrium.
Cancer Lett. 2000 Feb 1;148(2):197-205. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(99)00338-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytological features of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.子宫颈小细胞神经内分泌癌的细胞学特征
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jun 18;30(2):401. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15147. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Cytologic features of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinomas of the endometrium.子宫内膜未分化和去分化癌的细胞学特征。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Feb;129(2):121-131. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22351. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Liquid-based Papanicolaou smear: Unusual cytological features of a uterine mass.液基巴氏涂片:子宫肿块的异常细胞学特征。
Cytojournal. 2020 Jan 31;17:2. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_89_2019. eCollection 2020.