Nowak Jolanta, Hudzik Bartosz, Niedziela Jacek T, Rozentryt Piotr, Ochman Marek, Przybyłowski Piotr, Zembala Marian, Gąsior Mariusz
3rd Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Silesian Centre for Heart Disease, Zabrze, Poland.
Department of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, School of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.
Clin Respir J. 2019 Apr;13(4):212-221. doi: 10.1111/crj.13000. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show poor prognosis. The importance of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular morphology and function in patients with end-stage lung diseases referred for lung transplantation (LT) is not well established.
To assess whether LV and RV echocardiographic parameters influence survival of patients with IPF, COPD and other interstitial lung diseases (ILD) awaiting LT.
In 65 patients (20 patients with COPD, 37 with IPF and 8 with other ILD), we performed transthoracic echocardiography and right heart catheterization. Echocardiographic parameters were assessed with regard to 1-year all-cause mortality.
The mortality rate was higher in patients with smaller dimensions of LV end-systolic (LVESD) and end-diastolic (LVEDD) diameter (HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.16-7.69, P = .023; and HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.16-7.14, P = .022; respectively), higher RV-to-LV (RV/LV-4CH) ratio (HR 7.6, 95% CI 1.6-29.5, P = .009) and RV proximal outflow tract (RVOT-PLAX) dilatation (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.22-5.96, P = .015). These associations were independent of age, gender, body mass index, VC, FEV1% and pulmonary diagnosis. The subanalysis of IPF patients demonstrated that the smaller LVESD and LVEDD increased mortality rate (HR 15.0, 95% CI 2.87-89.72, P = .003; HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.5-15.5, P = .006; respectively). No such associations were found in the COPD patients.
LV echocardiographic parameters (LVESD or LVEDD) are useful in predicting survival in patients with end-stage lung diseases, mainly in IPF patients awaiting LT. Other parameters (RV/LV-4CH and RVOT-PLAX dilatation) may also influence survival.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)预后较差。对于因终末期肺部疾病而接受肺移植(LT)评估的患者,左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)的形态及功能的重要性尚未完全明确。
评估左心室和右心室超声心动图参数是否会影响等待肺移植的IPF、COPD及其他间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者的生存率。
对65例患者(20例COPD患者、37例IPF患者和8例其他ILD患者)进行经胸超声心动图检查和右心导管检查。评估超声心动图参数与1年全因死亡率的关系。
左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)和舒张末期内径(LVEDD)较小的患者死亡率较高(HR分别为3.03,95%CI为1.16 - 7.69,P = 0.023;以及HR为2.9,95%CI为1.16 - 7.14,P = 0.022),右心室与左心室(RV/LV - 4CH)比值较高(HR为7.6,95%CI为1.6 - 29.5,P = 0.(此处原文有误,应为0.009))以及右心室流出道近端(RVOT - PLAX)扩张(HR为2.69,95%CI为1.22 - 5.96,P = 0.015)。这些关联独立于年龄、性别、体重指数、肺活量(VC)、第1秒用力呼气容积百分比(FEV1%)和肺部诊断。IPF患者的亚组分析表明,较小的LVESD和LVEDD会增加死亡率(HR分别为15.0,95%CI为2.87 - 89.72,P = 0.003;HR为4.95,95%CI为1.5 - 15.5,P = 0.006)。在COPD患者中未发现此类关联。
左心室超声心动图参数(LVESD或LVEDD)有助于预测终末期肺部疾病患者的生存率,主要是等待肺移植的IPF患者。其他参数(RV/LV - 4CH和RVOT - PLAX扩张)也可能影响生存率。