Liu Qin, Hou Yaping, Yang Liu, Zhao Min, Li Shengxu, Xi Bo
Department of Ultrasound, Children's Hospital of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Apr;40(4):738-743. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02058-7. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
In contrast to the percentile-based definitions of elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension for children and adolescents of all ages in the 2004 fourth report, the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) BP guideline recommends a change to single BP cut-offs for clinical diagnosis (120/< 80-129/< 80 mmHg for elevated BP and ≥ 130/80 mmHg for hypertension) in adolescents aged 13 years and older, and it also recommends researchers using the percentile-based definitions for more precise BP classification. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic effect of the single BP cut-offs for identifying adolescent abnormal BP as compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table by sex, age, and height. Data were from 8287 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES 1999-2016 and 1659 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES III (1988-1994). Compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table, the single BP thresholds performed well for identifying elevated BP in adolescents in NHANES 1999-2016/NHANES III, with high values of area under the curve 0.93/0.95, sensitivity 86.7%/89.9%, specificity 100%/100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%/100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.2%/98.8%, and kappa coefficient 0.92/0.94. The results were similar for identifying hypertension in the two datasets, with especially high PPV 100%/100% and NPV 99.2%/99.2%. However, the sensitivity values of the simple method for identifying hypertension were not satisfactory among girls, younger adolescents, and Hispanic adolescents in both datasets. In conclusion, the single BP cut-offs in general performed similarly well for identifying abnormal BP as compared to 2017 AAP percentile table, but not well in some subgroups.
与2004年第四次报告中针对各年龄段儿童和青少年基于百分位数定义的血压升高(BP)和高血压不同,2017年美国儿科学会(AAP)血压指南建议对13岁及以上青少年的临床诊断采用单一血压临界值(血压升高为120/<80 - 129/<80 mmHg,高血压为≥130/80 mmHg),并且建议研究人员使用基于百分位数的定义进行更精确的血压分类。我们研究的目的是评估与2017年AAP百分位数表相比,单一血压临界值在按性别、年龄和身高识别青少年异常血压方面的诊断效果。数据来自1999 - 2016年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中的8287名13 - 17岁青少年以及第三次NHANES(1988 - 1994年)中的1659名13 - 17岁青少年。与2017年AAP百分位数表相比,单一血压阈值在识别1999 - 2016年NHANES/第三次NHANES青少年血压升高方面表现良好,曲线下面积值较高,分别为0.93/0.95,灵敏度为86.7%/89.9%,特异度为100%/100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%/100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为98.2%/98.8%,kappa系数为0.92/0.94。在两个数据集中识别高血压的结果相似,PPV尤其高,为100%/100%,NPV为99.2%/99.2%。然而,在两个数据集中,该简单方法在识别女孩、较年轻青少年和西班牙裔青少年高血压方面的灵敏度值并不理想。总之,与2017年AAP百分位数表相比,单一血压临界值在识别异常血压方面总体表现相似,但在某些亚组中表现不佳。